More on Clinton Anderson

https://youtu.be/g1GTXXQq0_w

This is a sale video I came across on one of CA’s Signature Horses.

What I want to draw attention to is the signature focus of all his horses, and that is the constant contorted and extreme flexing of the head and neck.

This is so wrong on so many levels. And what really pisses me off is CA and guys like him hold themselves beyond examination by their peers. There is no review. It’s good because he convinces people it is good. He just made it up, because he thinks its a better thing. Particularly disturbing to me to see a very young person learning this.

This filly is only three, so obviously her training began at two, and has been pretty rigorous to make it though this program. They are asking $30,000. Just because it has his trademark branded on her. They don’t even mention her breeding.
This horse looks like a robot. So submissive it’s sad.

What can anybody say, except that the guy is a moron, and deserves some of his own abuse;
http://www.writingofriding.com/in-the-media/clinton-anderson-really-knows-how-to-abuse-2-year-olds/

He IS a moron and certainly NOT a horse trainer! That horse he is on in the first post looks as though she has given up. It’s really sad these nitwit, wannabe, macho guys think this is “perfection” or “well trained” – He sure as hell would never touch one of mine!
PennyG

Can we get a sticky saying" Bitchy Put Down Thread " so I don’t have to open them any more?

I don’t think he has always been this way. I can’t view the video due to my rural internet, but I can see it in patches. Unfortunately, he isn’t 100% to blame, as long as there are people willing to pay these prices for a horse with a broken spirit, who acts like a robot. There are plenty. Sad.

Can we get a sticky that says “this is abusive training, stop throwing money at his ego?”

shrug all in perspective I guess.

I posted this not to just start a bashing session. I think it is important to continue to point out to people who think he is wonderful, the serious flaws in his methods.
Those contorted flexing of the horses head and neck, which is the hallmark of his training, should not stand or be validated. It is a grotesque distortion of form and function. It is bio mechanically unsound.

I doubt that anybody on this board thinks he is wonderful.

So I guess I am preaching to the choir.

[QUOTE=st_francis;8172368]
Can we get a sticky saying" Bitchy Put Down Thread " so I don’t have to open them any more?[/QUOTE]

You know, it’s one thing to say, “I think he’s a jerk,” or “I don’t like his mustache.” (PP).

It’s quite another to say, “What I want to draw attention to is the signature focus of all his horses, and that is the constant contorted and extreme flexing of the head and neck. This is so wrong on so many levels.”

The general public sees SO much of this overbending that it begins to look normal and OK. I think it is important to say, “No. It is wrong on so many levels.”

IMO, OP made a valid point and a valid post.

Enough with all that standing on back bull***t . Can’t remember the last time I bought a horse because someone could do that.

I too, have wondered about the extreme submissiveness of his horses - the ‘no life’ look in their eyes. I would not know what to do with a horse with no spark.

I’ve been around animals my entire life. I’ve trained cows (yes, really) to ride, pick up their feet, be doctored (because my parents wouldn’t buy me a horse). I started with horses long before any of these NH guys were on anybody’s radar.

I’ve personally used both “traditional” and NH methods to train horses. The last one I started, using pretty strictly CA methodology, was a train wreck. Physically, you cannot do that to a horse and expect them to stay sound. Mentally, they’ll only take so much before they blow up and you better be prepared to ride it through, or else you’ll end up with a mess. I am lucky I guess, to have a reasonable amount of common sense that said to me, ‘ya know this might not be the best thing’.

Anyway, that said, there’s lessons to be learned wherever you look. I don’t think everything he does or stands for is wrong. His horses being robots - think about the crowd he plays to. The average ‘John Q. Public’ wants a horse they can slap a saddle on, go ride, and not worry about the rest of it. How are you going to have that if the horse still has any life left?

If I ever start another youngster (doubtful, at my age) I will use a mixture of methods that best suit my overall goals. ANY horse I handle is handled with a mixture of methods that fit the current situation. I won’t refuse to use a “tool” just because I don’t like the name stamped on the handle. If it works, it works.

If you look far enough back in history, these NH guys are just reinventing the wheel anyway.

Wirt, you seem to have a real issue with CA. Why do you watch him?

You posted April 9th a similar video and comments. At that time, I asked you for help in locating your training DVDs so people like me who live a long way from any trainers can watch them and know the correct Wirt way to train horses. Or maybe you’d just like to post a video of a Wirt trained horse so I can see if that’s the result I want if I follow your method.

Since I spent a lot of time responding to your last CA post, I’m just going to paste what I wrote before. And Eqbrit, I wouldn’t presume to speak for everyone on this board. Having never met CA, I don’t know that I’d call him “wonderful” --but I do find his DVDs and methods useful. So now on to my long post from April 9th when this topic was last discussed (to death, I thought):

Yes, I am for Clinton Anderson. And here is why: (previously posted under the last CA post on the Western forum) --and a bit of new thought added at the bottom . . . and no, I’m not a Troll, or anyone other than me.

Clinton Anderson is a teacher --of horses, of people --but bottom line he has a method or lesson he has faith in, and tries to educate other people in what has worked for him.

Keeping that in mind, remember that all teachers and their methods are not acceptable nor do they work for all students. Further, every teacher has good and bad days, good and bad lessons, and again, what works for one student will not work for another. What is acceptable “discipline” to one parent is “abusive” to another.

I find both CA and John Lyons videos helpful. I’m a teacher (high school Lit and psychology). I like how CA (and JL) “write their lesson plans” in a logical method where each step builds on the other. And me PERSONALLY, I like the kind of horse that is the result of me using their methods. I like that CA’s lesson plans are about 30 min long (my attention span) and suggest working with the horse about an hour at a time (daily) --maybe a couple of times a day, but minimum hour a day with 20 min review, 20 min new stuff, and 20 min doing something the horse does well. He makes it clear that the once a week rider will not find success as quickly as someone who works with a horse daily --just like school, he said. I like that. And I like that the DVDs show common problems one will run into, and mistakes the handler/rider makes, and mistakes the horse will possibly make.

I like that CA never calls a horse bad or says the horse has a bad attitude. He makes sense to me.

I have never seen him in person, and base ALL my knowledge of him on a few DVDs that I followed along with, and then went down and practices on what he calls “a fat lazy gelding.” I don’t know how his methods would work on an OTTB, although I did train two of them ground manners using his methods quite successfully (desensitizing, staying out of my personal space, loading, backing in hand, that sort of thing --and that went well).

As I said, no teacher or trainer is beyond reproach as there are too many people who simply hold different opinions on how a lesson should be taught. I teach high school seniors. I expect hands to be raised before they speak in class. Other teachers use a more “open forum” insisting that raising hands is demeaning and indicates that the teacher is the superior (wisdom) in the classroom where ideas are all equal in value. Do my students learn less? I see it as respect where other teachers see it as forced submission.

Same with horses. I foxhunt --that can be rather violent at times with mad gallops over hills, through woods, jumping things never meant to be jumped (like hounds). Then we stop. And wait. MY HORSE stands absolutely still. He never touches the bit --as a matter of fact, I HUNT on a loose rein in a snaffle bit. My horse moves off leg and seat and pretty much has his head free. To others in the hunt -this is a sign my horse is poorly trained and I am a poor rider. I’ve been told that I should keep my horse on the bit and count my strides between fences and let him know when to jump --can’t do it, I don’t know that stuff myself. He jumps when he thinks it’s the right moment to do so and I stay out of his way. One rider asked if I didn’t mind that I couldn’t feel my horse’s mouth and have a conversation with him through my hands --um, no. She asked how I keep him from running into the horse ahead since I don’t use my reins -well, he slows when I post slower, or drop my weight into my stirrups. All of this is from CA videos. And at most checks or when I feel he’s not focused, we do the bending and releasing. It’s subtle, but we do it. Keeps him limber, light in the bridle, and remembering that I’m riding.

And to those who prefer hot horses yanking at the bits and prancing and dancing during checks --and doing some rearing and bucking now and then --I admire their ability to stay on. He did act like that when I started him, but training cured it–I don’t think my horse fears me --I do think he respects me. And before you decide I don’t ride well --I’m usually asked to ride in the Master’s pocket (right beside him) and when people need a lead over a tricky fence, it’s often my horse and me who are asked to do so -

Different people want differently trained horses. I want a quiet mount who thinks for himself. I trained my horse to do that. People who want a horse on the bit, a handful of energy, should steer clear of CA --that’s not what he’s trying to do.

Oh, and there is a fine line between fear and respect. A horse that is afraid can’t learn (neither can a student who is afraid of a teacher). But without respect, a teacher can’t teach. That CA expects (demands?) his horses respect to me is a basic element of the teaching (training) process.

New thought if you’ve read this far --specifically to OP --it is easy to surf the web and find a picture of about anyone doing something wrong. I wonder how many pictures and videos out there are of CA doing something right that you didn’t post? Frankly, if you followed me around my classroom for the last 30+ years I bet you could take a few pictures (ok, more than a few) of me being a “bad teacher” --ugly, angry face at a poor child who didn’t have his homework in , a hand on a shoulder that looks improper, a hug that might be “inappropriate.” You might even catch me pulling down my slip, or adjusting a bra strap. ALL IN A CLASSROOM!!

If you followed me around my farm you could probably take pictures of me abusing my animals. I’m sure (more than sure) that the hound whip I use in hunting was used to warn my dogs off chasing the sheep (imagine a pix of me using a small bullwhip --that’s what they look like-)- to flog my dogs! I’m sure there could be a horrible picture of me tossing a barn cat out of the barn on a snowy morning into a bank of snow (after he tripped me by wrapping around my legs) --and horse abuse, yep --follow me around with a camera and you will see me abusing my horses with spurs and whips —both of which I wear and use to the best of my ability, but if you took a photo at just the right time, would look like horse abuse to some – wonder what we could photograph you doing?

Now remember OP, CA is photographed a ton more than me in reality --and I have no doubt that those photos you posted show him doing something he shouldn’t have. He’s human –

But here’s the point of this long ramble --if you are going to point and shoot like you did in your post --I challenge you to do it better. Would you let me know where I can buy your training DVDs? Can you post a video of your trained horses in action with you doing the training? If you can’t, then what do you suggest an old lady like me do? Just let my horse sit in the barn until I magically figure out how to address his issues or improve what he does? Maybe you should figure out that even if CA and John Lyons and the other “popular” trainers aren’t what you are looking for, they do work for some people – and we who DO use and follow along with what they teach are SMART enough to know when training becomes abusive --I would never hit my horse in the eyes (although I did accidentally put a polo mallet up his nose by accident when I missed a shot) –

Oh, and another thought (geesh, I do run on) --I was trying to each my horse to back out of my personal space when I walked toward him. I was getting nowhere --doing everything the CA DVD said to do. Finally, I stepped forward, tripped, and fell flat in front of my horse who then when FLYING backwards. What I learned (by scaring the poor horse to death) was I needed to make my BODY LANGUAGE easier to read --remember I’m a little old lady and CA is a big fellow --my horse didn’t realize what I wanted because I didn’t make my cues FORCEFUL enough. If you filmed the flailing arms and huge waving gestures I made with my CA stick after that --you’d have thought I was a nut case --but my horse learned!! And now I just take a tiny step forward and he backs out of my way –

So yes --I am for Clinton Anderson --and anyone else who tries to be a teacher --we’re never going to satisfy everyone --but who can?

Foxglove

Not that anyone cares, but the video the OP linked to is a ‘sale barn’ web site for"horseperfection.com" It is someone who ‘thinks’ they are following his method. It is a woman doing the riding.

www.horseperfection.com/About-Us.html

This is not CA, nor is it his farm.

FWIW… whenever someone with a horse for sale starts extolling the virtues of the beast’s “beautiful long thick mane and tale”, with not a word about conformation or soundness, RUN.

[QUOTE=st_francis;8172368]
Can we get a sticky saying" Bitchy Put Down Thread " so I don’t have to open them any more?[/QUOTE]

Dude! The thread had “Clinton Anderson” in the title. You knew what you were opening.

And the guy deserves it. For all intents and purposes, you could treat “Clinton Anderson” as a synonym for “big ol’ douchebag (who how, for the love of God, did he get so rich and famous)”?

On one point in the OP’s post: You must admit that there’s no “peer review” for any horse trainer. Anderson is not especially bad in this respect, rather his consumers are. And I agree that the stuff he does with a horse’s neck is very, very bad.

Someday, cervical arthritis in horses is going to get the attention it deserves. This is like ulcers. When endoscopy got cheap enough that we started scoping a lot of horses, we found a lot of ulcers. When we start X-raying more horses’ necks, I think we’ll find a lot of arthritis-- particularly near the poll and base. Perhaps then CA will be taken back down a peg or six.

I’ll just have to disagree with the part of Foxgloves post that I read (did not read most of it, too long) but the part where she says she is just a little old lady and does not make her cues forceful enough. You don’t need force or size - as Tom Dorrance showed - A flick of a finger is enough if the horse understands.

Overall, the NH hype has had its day and while I agree and admire the true practitioners, traditional methods by my many mentors works just as well…
and never a hand raised, or a cross word.

[QUOTE=csaper58;8173174]
Not that anyone cares, but the video the OP linked to is a ‘sale barn’ web site for"horseperfection.com" It is someone who ‘thinks’ they are following his method. It is a woman doing the riding.

www.horseperfection.com/About-Us.html

This is not CA, nor is it his farm.[/QUOTE]

To Foxglove post as well.
The horse is the video has his brand on it. This is a CA certified horse.
This is the problem. It’s the same with PP. If you are a teacher, then the best measure of your success will be in your students, and how they behave and train under your brand name. It is without question that Clinton proceeds in extreme bending of the head and neck, to the point where it is just and ugly contortion. All with the idea that this is lightness to the bit. i think he truly believes that this is how a horse should respond to the bit, and carry himself. I have seen him school a reining horse in person. I have seen videos and photographs. I have seen enough. And his students imitate this. He promotes a form that is a distortion of any sort of classical riding, even classical western bridle horse stockmanship type riding. In my opinion, it is an abomination of what a bridle horse should be. I think it ruins a horse. I am not against flexing the neck, but it is important the horses head stays vertical to the ground when you do it, and not pulled sideways to the knee the way CA and his students do, and do constantly. I might teach a young horse how to give his neck, after that, I hardly ever do it.
I also think that at least half of the extreme ground work he does is completely unnecessary, and constant tampering with every form of submission there is.
Before CA, there were plenty of good horsemen making good safe broke horses. .
There is also an element of circus training that comes into what is called natural horsemanship.

I am a bridle horse guy. I like the California style, and I like a horse up in the poll and elevated. It lends itself to many other forms of riding, including even classical dressage, or jumping. I do not want a horse dropping his nose to his knees every time I pick up a rein, and curling behind the verticle, and traveling with his poll first, and his eyes on the ground. I see him teaching this, and I just want to slap him.

caspar58 --you made me laugh out loud! About 30 years ago I was on the hunt for the “perfect” horse for my then 10 year old daughter --figured a 10 year old small quarter horse mare would fill the bill --through a series of misunderstandings, I found myself face to face with a 15 year old Morgan gelding (old style) who KNEW HIS STUFF! With no vet check or hesitation, I wrote a check right there for $800. THEN I went and picked up the kid to see if she “wanted to buy the horse.” (She didn’t know he’d already been bought for her --too good to pass up at that price). She took one look at him and said, “Oh, Mommy, he’s PERFECT!” --I asked her how she could tell without riding him --she said, “He has a long mane and tail.” LOL! We did hunters at that point and all ours wore pulled short manes – for braiding --the sight of that long black mane (it and his tail were gorgeous and the rest of him was pretty good looking too!) --so she “bought” her first horse because he had a long mane and tail! FYI he turned out to be a super horse -did ten years of 4-H with her --taught us all to ride flat saddle-- then died the day of her first horse trial with her new horse --kind of like he’d done his job and now it was time to retire to the pasture in the sky. You might wonder at the $800 price on such a great horse --turned out at that moment in time, a bunch of “old style Morgans” hit the skids because they could no longer place in shows --everyone was moving to a lighter “Saddlebred” type Morgan. This horse had been a national winner and had graced the cover of Morgan Horse magazine (seller gave me a copy of it). He was a great horse.

Foxglove

And one more thing.
I hold Clinton Anderson, as well as Pat Parelli, personally responsible for the mess they have created.

[QUOTE=csaper58;8173174]
Not that anyone cares, but the video the OP linked to is a ‘sale barn’ web site for"horseperfection.com" It is someone who ‘thinks’ they are following his method. It is a woman doing the riding.

www.horseperfection.com/About-Us.html

This is not CA, nor is it his farm.[/QUOTE]

I didn’t bother looking at the video, this thread designed to bash someone the OP evidently has a problem with.

If it is true that this is not about Cinton Anderson riding a horse in questionable, abusive ways, then I think the OP has some answering to do about that kind of badmouthing the wrong person.

There is abuse and there is abuse and this thread seems to be based on someone abusing Clinton Anderson’s name with the wrong video for that?

I have seen him in person twice, when he came thru here and our local 4H groups were given free tickets, as we did when Parelli came thru also.

I have to say, Clinton is a better trainer than many other such clinicians, better than most riders and trainers out there and I expect better than everyone posting here.

Then, he is not anyone I would follow, he is too demanding and more forceful in his demands than is necessary most times.
He is too quick and rushes horses and works them a little too much too long, wearing them down.
He also overflexes them constantly.

That all I don’t like, but would not start threads to run him down for it or call it abuse, much less using someone else’s, not a Clinton video.

Now, may trainers do flex horses, some a lot, it is not abuse to flex horses, to overdo it is questionable, but would have to be extreme to be called abusive, which Clinton is at times getting very close to.

Now, I was in gymnastics as a kid and I expect anyone watching us train may have called all the overflexing we did abusive.
It would have been to do that with a couch potato fat kid, I don’t think it was for us fit kids in training that demanded extreme flexibility.
Not any more than ask kids in track to run faster and faster, or race colts to run sprints and later races.

Clinton Anderson is training for performance athletes and that demands you train hard, of course without being abusive.

Where does that line cross from training and pushing for better to over the top abusive?
That is where each one of us will have different ideas.
I will say, I would not let Clinton work with one of my horses.
I don’t see the need for them to be pushed like that, but respect the right of others to disagree.

My old trainer used to say, “your horses will tell on you”.
I want my horses to tell that they can be 100% comfortable around me.
If I happen to raise my hand to flick a fly they won’t act worried or much less run backwards.
To others, that the horse is that alert and responsive may be how they like it.

Different strokes …
We need to remember that not everyone wants the same in our horses.
That doesn’t mean what others like crosses into abuse because we don’t like it.
I think many against Clinton are trying to go there.