I miss understood - I clearly mis read your comment- my appology.
No problem. Because⊠itâs the internet.
Yup! Easy to mis interpret Thank you.
Just to clarify.
I meant that there probably would be lots of very similar videos of the Davidsons and the Whittakers and the Towells and the Klimkes and a lot of other riding families if everyone had that technology on hand at the time.
I understood you MHM!
Thank you, I miss interpreted your post, my apologies. thank you for clarifying - arenât they delightful!?
Maybe he asked for this info just to be beligerent - like, if you want us to produce audio transcripts, you can produce lexis nexis reports for us. Only its not the same and it doesnâ translate.
This is my question - why would MB/SGF be required to produce data for GAS? I could see if it was personal info not availble anywhere else, but if MG/SGF took the time, hours and hours, maybe, to gather publically available information, should they be obligated to give that info to the other side, who canât be bothered to pay for a paralegal to gather it?
Generally your required to produce what youâre going to rely on as evidence. I agree itâs odd that GAS needs the Lexus report from SGF, as itâs more reliable to get it yourself from public documents.
I donât really understand how the appeal or the info from the criminal trial matters since Lk was a part of that and itâs likely she has the same stuff mb has, and much more than SGF. Certainly the prosecutor have everything to both sides.
It seems like a reach, unless there have been some depositions already, so the requests for production have begun.
But this is no ordinary plaintiff, so i have no idea how it will play out
Ok I thought it was some whacky stuff to be asking, seeing g as how the same information is publicly available to GAS. Unless GAS Didnât write that, or even read it just signed it and JK is the one too dumb to realize he should already have all that info, and he can get his own lexus nexus.
Itâs all just another legal yet sleazy tactic. Expect many more. Expect every allowable underhanded, sneaky, tasteless, rude, annoying ploy out there because this is âwarâ and in war victory often comes to the one most willing to get down and dirty and wrestle in the muck and mud.
The appeal is not from the criminal trial. The appeal is associated with the handling of the Krol hearing.
So GAS has no riight to it, correct?
I am not a lawyer but I can not see what it even slightly has to do with the civil trial.
I would also think that Judge Taylor would probably prefer the written long list of things he messed up at the Krol hearing be spread quite so far and wide amongst his fellow judges.
Well, SGF should respond âTo the extent that they exist, they are all publically available.â
That would be an amazing response.
I can not wait to read whatever it is they respond with. It is going to be amazing, I have no doubt. Mr. Silver and Mr. Deininger both do a terrific job writing responses to these crazy things (GAS) files.
I love that emoji under the circumstances. I wonder if it should be combined with this one for GAS fire.
Or is there an emoji for dumpster?
Great job everyone on keeping this thread pleasant and engaging in productive discussion!
Perfect!!!
Anyone listen to the True Crime Daily podcast? Their episode today was interesting in talking about the Lori Vallow case and discussing defendants and plaintiffs right to information/discovery for trials. Kind of reminded me of this case. The lawyer on there also mentioned how some cases he has filed tonnes of motions back and forth. Also reminded me of this case. Nothing crazy but an interesting listen if youâre into it.