[QUOTE=JER;6757002]
Maybe it’s time to give up on the USEF. The USEF has had numerous opportunities to show its own membership that it is serious about horse welfare and anti-doping, but the facts show otherwise. The USEF will always side with insiders and money.
This year, we had the Humble incident, the Uriaco (?)/Deslauriers/Clark incident, and the rather tawdry spectacle of the eventing chef d’equipe hiring his mistress as an assistant. When that last thing happens in the real world, as with Arkansas football coach Bobby Petrino, the corrupt cad is shown the door pronto. Not so with the USEF. Not a peep from them about it, and also not a peep from the ‘industry news leader’ known as the Chronicle of the Horse.
The vast majority of the USEF membership, just like the vast majority of the equestrian community, which includes all of us gathered here, does not support the USEF in terms of how it handled these incidents.
Perhaps its time to give up on the USEF and equestrian media. Does anyone really believe John Long and his organization wants real change? I’m sure Jane Clark’s decision to send her horses and money overseas was more of a blow than anything any large group of ordinary USEF members could come up with.
Maybe it’s time to get state/local law enforcement, local animal control/welfare and state/local licensing/professional boards involved. You’ve got a traveling carnival of controlled medications and syringes and unlicensed veterinary activity and child endangerment – and they’re coming to your town soon.
Maybe the USEF would start to listen if outside agencies – with legal authority and powers of arrest and enforcement – got involved.
This is essentially what happened with the sport of cycling. The UCI did nothing about doping, so LE stepped in. This happened in Spain with Operation Puerto, and most recently in the US with USADA and the Postal Service case. There are a number of cyclists and hangers-on who avoid certain European countries as a result – if they show up, they risk arrest.
Sometimes change takes a real shake-up. With USEF, we clearly have a group at the top of the food chain that likes things the way they are with a strong interest in protecting their fiefdom.[/QUOTE]
I agree this IS NOT a new problem. USEF and the former AHSA have been well aware of this problem for years and years and yet at the constant urging of members have refused to get serious on the issue. At the least, USEF has been negligent and at the worst, criminal. IMO the attitude and unethical practices of EM and countless others like her are a direct result of the unwillingness of the USEF to abide by it very own mission statement.