NYT article on PETA undercover in Asmussen's barn

http://www.jockeyclub.com/Default.asp?section=Resources&area=0&story=699

Friday, March 28, 2014 Contact: Bob Curran Jr. (212) 521-5326
Statement of Ogden Mills Phipps, Chairman of The Jockey Club and Thoroughbred Owner/Breeder

Following the allegations raised by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and reported on March 20, 2014, by The New York Times, many of us in the Thoroughbred industry are eagerly awaiting the final determination of these issues by the New York State Gaming Commission and the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission.

It is my hope that these state bodies use all the prosecutorial powers available to determine if there is evidence of animal cruelty, medication violations — and cheating.

Like so many others, I was upset by what I read in the Times and disgusted by what I saw and what was alleged in that PETA video. Any person abusing a horse or caught with an electronic stimulation device like the one described in the video should be banned from the sport for life.

And as much as it pains me to see our industry being denigrated in the media, there is another part of me that feels that we, as an industry, deserve every bit of that criticism because the sport’s rules and our penalties have not been effective deterrents.

To be sure, we have seen some encouraging actions from racing commissions.

In 2011 in New York, the regulators handed trainer Richard Dutrow Jr. a 10-year suspension on the basis that Dutrow’s conduct at racetracks in New York State and elsewhere had been “improper, obnoxious, unbecoming, and detrimental to the best interests of racing.”

And last year, authorities from Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico collectively issued fines and suspensions to 14 licensees totaling nearly $253,000 and carrying 213 years of suspensions for those held to have had a role in the administration of illegal drugs, such as Dermorphin, to racehorses.

Those are steps in the right direction.

Owners, trainers, veterinarians — and really anyone who makes a living in the Thoroughbred industry — need to speak up any time they witness improper and dangerous treatment of horses or dishonest activity.

We certainly shouldn’t need an animal rights organization or a major publication to identify bad actors or their bad deeds.

All of us should feel a personal and professional duty to police this sport and immediately report any wrongdoing, either directly to the appropriate authority or through a national hotline, such as the one maintained by the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau (866-TIP-TRPB).

As recommended by the American Association of Equine Practitioners, owners, trainers and veterinarians should share and adopt a policy that any therapeutic treatment or veterinary procedure for a horse involved in racing or race training be based upon a specific diagnosis and communicated among each party.

And, above all, there must be respect for the horse.

The Jockey Club, in addition to our industry service and marketing of the sport, has devoted immense resources over a long period of time to ensure the health of our athletes, resolve medication and safety issues in our sport and bring much needed transparency to the regulation of our horse racing.

We continue to believe that horses should compete only when they are free from the influence of medication, and we have supported the reforms that make up the national uniform medication program that was first proposed in 2011 (horseracingreform.org) and encompasses controlled therapeutic medications, prohibited substances, accredited labs and penalty guidelines for multiple medication violations.

By our count, however, only four of the 38 states with racing have fully implemented the national uniform medication program thus far (namely: Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts and Virginia) — and those states deserve our highest praise and appreciation. A dozen others are in various stages of “adoption” but have yet to commit to a definitive implementation date — often because of the simple fact the bureaucratic process can be painstakingly slow. In other cases special interest groups, intent on maintaining the status quo, have stalled action.

While there is no doubt that some of those shown in the March 20 video deserve condemnation for their actions and their attitudes, representatives of states that have not adopted the national uniform medication program should also shoulder blame for the current state of affairs. Their inaction feeds the negative perceptions of our sport and lends credence to the charge that we are incapable of broad-based reform.

For every small step forward — whether it’s a televised racing series, a marketing tour, or new owner and new fan initiatives — we take two giants steps backward when prospective fans, owners, television networks, sponsors, elected officials or animal rights advocates read and see media reports that convey inhumane treatment of our athletes and a lack of integrity in our sport.

Enough is enough.

The horses deserve better.

Owners and trainers deserve better.

And in a sport based on the integrity of competition, certainly fans who wager their hard earned money deserve better.

At the Round Table Conference last August, I said that The Jockey Club supported these reforms on a state-by-state basis, but the clock was ticking. I emphasized that if the state-by-state approach failed to produce the needed changes, we would look to alternative means to implement these reforms.

One alternative avenue is federal legislation.

The draft legislation proposed by some federal lawmakers involving the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) is a highly attractive model. USADA has the experience, the knowledge and the credibility to bring much-needed integrity to our sport.

The time to draw that proverbial line in the sand is rapidly approaching and The Jockey Club’s Board of Stewards plans to do that no later than the 62nd annual Round Table Conference on August 10, 2014.

Over the coming weeks and months, we will carefully assess the progress and the status of the national medication reform campaign.

If the major racing states have not implemented these reforms, The Jockey Club will reach out to federal lawmakers who have previously proposed federal legislation for our industry and to other supporters of this approach. We will aggressively seek rapid implementation, including steps leading toward the elimination of all race-day medications.

With the safety of our horses, the integrity of competition and the general perception of the sport all at risk, we cannot afford to wait any longer.

Enough is enough.

This is what jumps out at me from the JC statement:

"If the major racing states have not implemented these reforms, The Jockey Club will reach out to federal lawmakers who have previously proposed federal legislation for our industry and to other supporters of this approach. We will aggressively seek rapid implementation, including steps leading toward the elimination of all race-day medications.

[QUOTE=sjdressage;7503405]
Yes, I’ve seen that. She is somewhat aligned with a group of people who are extremist and attempt to publicly shame people on the internet who run older horses or horses who have had time off. They think they can tell what goes on in your barn from the computer by just looking at past performances. I mean sometimes horses have breathing problems that are resolved or something that can explain 20 length losses or time off. Occasionally they put misinformation out and delete it later with no retraction. I think sometimes good is done (horses found starving, etc) but it goes too far.
I think Maggie gives their scary agenda legitimacy which is unfortunate. However, we do need people speaking up who actually participate in the sport and respect their horses. Maybe she can help find some middle ground.[/QUOTE]

Totally agree, but she knows how to fan the fire, and then excuse herself (hit the delete button). I’m not sure how far this will go, law suit? IMO she will drop this like a hot potato. I’ve been close to a young kids suicide (someone that had worked for us). He was in trouble, family didn’t see it coming, but blamed no one but themselves for not being able to see what was going on in his head. The sad part was that he was only a foreman, so the chances of him being in trouble were probably pretty small.

Wow. That is quite a statement from Mr. Phipps. Good for him. If horse sports don’t demonstrate the ability to effectively regulate ourselves, we’ll be regulated by the horse-ignorant general public. Which would suck, because I don’t want to be told to be happy when I find a strong pulse in my horses’ front legs! :rolleyes:

Please, not the pulse in the foot thing again. In a healthy foot there should be a faint pulse, a bounding pulse would tell you that there is a problem. Zero pulse means there is potentially a bigger problem or the inflammation that should cause a bounding pulse is masked by pain meds.

I don’t know if it can be googled at this point but the irony is that Maggi Moss used to be firmly in the gunsights of these same groups but she has disarmed them with her rhetoric. I can remember defending Maggi from vocal people online and elsewhere who thought she was a claiming mill. But if you can’t beat em, join em I guess.

[QUOTE=Acertainsmile;7503348]
And she has jumped on quite a few people and tried to crucify them on FB lately for running horses over the age of 8. She used names and locations and encouraged people to call the Stewards.

However, I do appreciate what she does, and is good for the sport. But god forbid you are running an older horse that she feels should be retired, she has zero qualms about outing you on FB. (I have two very nice sound horses at my farm, one that retired at 11, and another at 12. Between the two they earned 1.2 million).

My point is that these horses were very well looked after during their careers. Just because they are older and were no longer stake horses doesn’t mean they should have been retired. As long as they are happy doing their job social media shouldn’t force a trainer to sell/retire them.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=sjdressage;7503405]
Yes, I’ve seen that. She is somewhat aligned with a group of people who are extremist and attempt to publicly shame people on the internet who run older horses or horses who have had time off. They think they can tell what goes on in your barn from the computer by just looking at past performances. I mean sometimes horses have breathing problems that are resolved or something that can explain 20 length losses or time off. Occasionally they put misinformation out and delete it later with no retraction. I think sometimes good is done (horses found starving, etc) but it goes too far.
I think Maggie gives their scary agenda legitimacy which is unfortunate. However, we do need people speaking up who actually participate in the sport and respect their horses. Maybe she can help find some middle ground.[/QUOTE]

Maggie Moss has aligned herself with a bunch of nutcases who call and threaten tracks, kill buyers, owners, trainers and so on.

They have made such a stink in the past, that locally all TBs are now going directly from the track to the meat man, rather than hitting an auction (and a chance) first.

If she can’t see THAT fact, then no wonder she doesn’t understand the implications of this video and its possible consequences.

She, of all people, should stop defending the morons in the business, regardless of whether that is a small or large percentage.

True Pronzini, she has employed trainers that are known to “make money at all costs”. It just gets old.

This is what I have tried to impress on people when they start up crusades online about horses bred by famous people at killpens. The powerful people in racing do not want to be embarrassed. Now instead of that wobbler half brother to the stakes horse having a chance at life as a teaser, he just gets quietly euthanized and now no one will ever try to make their rescue chops online using him.

Some people think that is an improvement. I’m not one of them.

And since it’s a rainy day (at least in my part of the world), here is a refresher from 2008, and a pretty good read.

http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/showthread.php?154580-It-keeps-getting-better-and-then-there-was-Asmussen

[QUOTE=Acertainsmile;7503532]
Please, not the pulse in the foot thing again. In a healthy foot there should be a faint pulse, a bounding pulse would tell you that there is a problem. Zero pulse means there is potentially a bigger problem or the inflammation that should cause a bounding pulse is masked by pain meds.[/QUOTE]

Yes, I know, I was being sarcastic, hence this guy: :rolleyes:

[QUOTE=Martha Drum;7503678]
Yes, I know, I was being sarcastic, hence this guy: :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

Gotcha!

A pic of Big Brown’s foot taken by a real photographer ie. not me.

1538801_10152288870254798_1793830627_n.jpg

[QUOTE=Laurierace;7503749]

A pic of Big Brown’s foot taken by a real photographer ie. not me.[/QUOTE]
Wow, that’s pretty gross. Hopefully non racing people don’t think this is common, I’ve never seen this kind of anatomy lesson on a horse in training.

I will say that I’ve run horses with quarter cracks. Once they are dried up and sewn up I haven’t had a problem.

Now you know why Kent wet his pants during the Belmont. He was afraid that thing had blown.

I have, and the same blacksmith worked on some horses that I regularly galloped when I worked for Dutrow Sr. Not common, but it does happen. Feet like these don’t necessarily mean the horse is in any discomfort.

[QUOTE=Acertainsmile;7503640]
And since it’s a rainy day (at least in my part of the world), here is a refresher from 2008, and a pretty good read.

http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/showthread.php?154580-It-keeps-getting-better-and-then-there-was-Asmussen[/QUOTE]

I read part of the thread and it’s pretty interesting. One thing that stood out is that back in 2008 there were more horseman speaking out and trying to educate why we do this and that. Now everyone is quiet, guess it gets tiring. I mean someone was trying to defend an electrolyte jug. Managing these horses is something someone can’t understand until they are put in our position. I came to racing after growing up with hunter jumpers. I got schooled pretty quick, ha ha! I remember walking a quiet racehorse around with no chain. One day I guess he got pretty fit, overpowered me and breezed all over the backside! Everyone knew who I was after that and not in a good way. Thank god the horse ran awesome next time out and I was cool again…

I only had a couple quarter cracks over my career but even after spending a fortune on patches or having it stitched up I never got them sound enough to train let alone run so they went to the farm until it grew out.

I think it was me that said I jugged my horses, and I basically have the same background as you sj…in fact my first job on the track was galloping at A.C in the summer of 82. I had great riders to learn from or I would have been toast.

[QUOTE=Laurierace;7503749]

A pic of Big Brown’s foot taken by a real photographer ie. not me.[/QUOTE]

Thanks Laurie.
Yikes. I don’t think it is in the horse’s best interest to race with a hoof in such poor shape. JMHO.