Obedience - for competition and beyond.

I have an Australian Cattle Dog. While these dogs are bright, very bright, they are not known for having a strong retrieve of birds. At one point, I made a decision this dog would do field work. Fetching up bumpers, no problem, fetching up fake ducks, no problem, had to work a little to take/hold/fetch a dove wing, but not much. She also does not like feathers in her mouth, but she did it.

the dead, frozen duck? Not so much. [I][b]I[/I][/b] didn’t like the way that duck smelled, so I can imagine how much worse it smelled to her. I wasn’t going to ear pinch her and I don’t own, and will not spend the serious cash for a good ecollar. So I pulled her arch nemesis up (one of the Corgis) during breakfast. I had my bowl of kibble ready, the duck out, the Corgi on lead to my left and put the ACD between my knees while I sat on the steps of the landing.

offer the duck, she said “no thanks”, Corgi got the kibble
rinse repeat. ACD got no breakfast.

set up again at dinner. Same thing happened and ACD got no dinner but the Corgi was happy.

breakfast the next day, about 1/2 through the ACD gingerly reached for the bird but did not touch it, click! She got the kibble. I did not push her past that point for the rest of breakfast. Dinner, she got the last 1/2 of her kibble. Next day, we had a retrieve with her canines jussstttt hooked enough to hold the bird and her lips wrinkled so they didn’t have to touch it. Tho her retrieve was not fast, furious or enthusiastic, she did learn to pick up that dead, stinky bird without either an ecollar or an ear pinch.

So it can be done without +P, if you use -R. Proofing? Can’t say to that because I quit after we got to the point of picking up the dead, frozen, stinks-like-hell duck. I didn’t want it that badly.

[QUOTE=BEARCAT;7988998]
But then, one could argue that he does not know the command, no?
The aim of clicker training should be to achieve learned behaviors that are reliable without food, but I think that last step is often missed.[/QUOTE]

No, he absolutely knows the command. He’s giving me the middle paw, as my trainer would say. Why should he want to come back to me instead of hunting? That’s a tough one. One good way to get the dog to come back is to train that after the recall they get sent out to hunt again. But obviouslythey are not stupid. When you get closer to the house they pretty much know the fun is over. :slight_smile:

Well, the natural instinct is the drive - because without it you would have nothing. A lot of the rest is trained obedience; in whatever way it’s taught (with reinforcement or with punishment). Otherwise, the dog hunts for itself, not for you.

Again, I’m talking about competition, too. The quality of the retrieve is not as important in real hunting; e.g. if the dog drops it, you can just pick it up. This is the group I belong to - a fun video on the front page of some seriously trained competition dogs pointing, backing, steady to wing and shot and retrieving to hand (and probably every one of them was “force fetched”).

http://www.sacnavhda.com/index.php

[QUOTE=threedogpack;7989144]
I wasn’t going to ear pinch her and I don’t own, and will not spend the serious cash for a good ecollar.

breakfast the next day, about 1/2 through the ACD gingerly reached for the bird but did not touch it, click! She got the kibble. I did not push her past that point for the rest of breakfast. Dinner, she got the last 1/2 of her kibble. Next day, we had a retrieve with her canines jussstttt hooked enough to hold the bird and her lips wrinkled so they didn’t have to touch it. Tho her retrieve was not fast, furious or enthusiastic, she did learn to pick up that dead, stinky bird without either an ecollar or an ear pinch.

So it can be done without +P, if you use -R. Proofing? Can’t say to that because I quit after we got to the point of picking up the dead, frozen, stinks-like-hell duck. I didn’t want it that badly.[/QUOTE]

Well…what I want is a proofed retrieve - in high adrenaline, high value situation. I am sure I could get my dog to retrieve a bumper in my yard for click/treats. (although he’d probably like the stinky duck better). What I’ve been told is that in pressure situations, it’s not reliable enough. But, I also think a lot of the people that say this haven’t actually tried. My field trainer is totally in favor of me trying to train a solid retrieve with only reinforcement. He is just cautioning me that it might not be solid enough in a real bird field, possibly with another dog, gunfire, and a lot of excitement. So, that’s the challenge. :slight_smile:

As I said, I know of someone that did it. But…is it possible to replicate that with the same results?

I am certain that had I chosen to continue, I’d have been able to get that, and without an ear pinch or an e collar. It’s about practicing till it becomes habit in all scenarios.

I am sure I could get my dog to retrieve a bumper in my yard for click/treats. (although he’d probably like the stinky duck better). What I’ve been told is that in pressure situations, it’s not reliable enough. But, I also think a lot of the people that say this haven’t actually tried.

and I think most trainers are lumpers. They request a big piece of behavior in new or demanding places and then when it doesn’t happen, say it can’t be done without +P. Most pros are after the money, and if I’m not mistaken, isn’t that the derbies and such?

My field trainer is totally in favor of me trying to train a solid retrieve with only reinforcement. He is just cautioning me that it might not be solid enough in a real bird field, possibly with another dog, gunfire, and a lot of excitement. So, that’s the challenge. :slight_smile:

as you saw I didn’t do just +R, I also used -R. Just to be clear.

As I said, I know of someone that did it. But…is it possible to replicate that with the same results?

I think so, but you have to be patient and take whatever time it takes to get it and I think many trainers feel the pinch of a timeline

[QUOTE=threedogpack;7989430]
I am certain that had I chosen to continue, I’d have been able to get that, and without an ear pinch or an e collar. It’s about practicing till it becomes habit in all scenarios. [/QUOTE]

To be honest, I’m not convinced based on your description of the reluctance. I’m not talking about a dog that doesn’t understand something - but a dog that doesn’t want to do something, has a much better option to choose, or that has to not do something. E.g. don’t run away with the bird; don’t put the bird down; don’t eat the bird. I could play recall games for hours with my dog if I wanted to reward with steak. Put him in a bird field and it’s a different story.

A lot of the people I know do a lot of their own field training; so I have to wonder why I only know one person that has “successfully” trained a solid competition retrieve without force fetch.

Yes, I did notice. Just out of curiosity, you mention that you didn’t want to spend the $ on an e-collar. But are you opposed to using them, or you just don’t want to buy one? I use one, and have seen them used in many examples to put pressure on a dog to comply with a known command. They are not inherently inhumane; any more than food “deprivation”.

The trainer did talk briefly about force fetch and which trainer’s methodology she uses. Of course I can’t remember but I will put the link here when I find the information. It’s not a hunting trainer but an obedience trainer.

Diane Bauman is the trainer whose “force fetch” (conditioned retrieve) methodology my obedience trainer uses. “Ear pinches” are not introduced until after the dog understands the concept, unlike the retriever trainer in the video.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0764541641/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A1KDAZTFBIFMWK#reader_0764541641

People tend to do what is known to work. There are force free trainers for hunt dogs out there that are very successful but they are few and far between as they have few role models and not many instructors have developed programs.

I haven’t read the whole thread (stopped at FF). I do competitive OB. Are you sure BN qualifies for the Versatility Title? I ask because BN is an optional title.

[QUOTE=S1969;7988369]
There is a reference to it being “force free” so I’m curious how they instill a retrieve in a dog that doesn’t particularly want to retrieve…

Generally, for many willing dogs, the retrieve IS the reward in the field.[/QUOTE]

I instilled a dumbbell retrieve in a dog who isn’t a natural or willing retriever and is missing a lot of teeth! I doubt retrieving is all that comfortable for him. I shaped it using info from Sue Ailsby and Denise Fenzi.

As you know, the field and gun dog world is vastly force fetch. I just read this article this morning and it is quite relevant to the retrieve question.

[QUOTE=Bicoastal;7989719]
I haven’t read the whole thread (stopped at FF). I do competitive OB. Are you sure BN qualifies for the Versatility Title? I ask because BN is an optional title.[/QUOTE]

Wow, you are right - thank you for thinking of that. I was positive I saw BN on the list for 1 point. :frowning: That’s a bummer, because I think some of the other areas are far easier to get 1 point toward this title (e.g. 5 show points = 1 point in the conformation area…not very hard unless your dog is oversized. It only needs to beat 1 other dog in my region to get 1 point; or a JH or NAVHDA NA for field, which doesn’t require much training, just instinct). These titles qualify for 1 point in “performance” area: CD, NA, NAJ, RN, NAP, NJP, TD, NF

Hmm…I know our obedience instructor is not training “for” BN, but always thinks 1-2 levels above where your first goal is so you can keep moving forward. I will definitely have to let her know this, though, so she can help us.

[QUOTE=Bicoastal;7989719]I instilled a dumbbell retrieve in a dog who isn’t a natural or willing retriever and is missing a lot of teeth! I doubt retrieving is all that comfortable for him. I shaped it using info from Sue Ailsby and Denise Fenzi.

As you know, the field and gun dog world is vastly force fetch. I just read this article this morning and it is quite relevant to the retrieve question.[/QUOTE]

Yes, it’s true, even in the “real” world of hunting a perfect, reliable retrieve isn’t necessary. It’s really nice, but it’s not a big deal if your dog puts the bird down on the way back.

Well, it will be interesting to see how this goes; I am not against the idea of reward based training - as I mentioned, the retrieve IS the reward for my dog…at the moment. I haven’t encountered a situation where he didn’t want to GO to the bird yet, but I could see a scenario where he might consider abandoning the 1st bird if he flushed a 2nd. Then what.

[QUOTE=S1969;7989730]
These titles qualify for 1 point in “performance” area: CD, NA, NAJ, RN, NAP, NJP, TD, NF[/QUOTE]

I’d say RN (Rally Novice) is the probably the easiest to attain in that list.

[QUOTE=Bicoastal;7989810]
I’d say RN (Rally Novice) is the probably the easiest to attain in that list.[/QUOTE]

I would have to agree. Though a TD might be one our OP’s dog has a knack for. Only catch being that opportunities to try for that title are limited

What an interesting thread! I was considering getting my Springer involved in field trials, but after learning about the force fetch I don’t think that is something I would be comfortable with. Very good to know.

I don’t know what the proper term is, maybe “back chaining,” but I first teach hold with a wooden dowel. This can take forever, btw. Keep it short. Then hold and sit. then taking a step or two holding into the sit. So teach from the end of the exercise forward. My dog has a natural retrieve, but I keep it very playful and never do outs to the ground (so hard to get them to break that to hang onto it for a formal retrieve).

I taught out as a puppy with a tug toy, btw, so that’s already there.

I use marker training, so “yes” instead of a clicker. Same idea–mark the correct behavior.

Not a hunting video but Ivan Balbanov and Michael Ellis would probably
be closer to what I do. You might find their videos interesting, if nothing else.

Train ahead, but don’t get carried away, imo. You don’t want your dog anticipating and throwing in a finish after the recall or something that costs you unnecessary points. I would also just stick to on-leash heeling through the BN. SO my dog has one more leg for his BN, but really he’s way past that point. Still, I will only do BN exercises a month before a trial. YMMV.

Oh and watch your leash placement on the stay. Stupid. Lost points on that–had no idea it had to be going to the side and behind. This is the first time I’ve done BN–before it was CD first. Just a tip I wish someone had told me (this is why I need to read the rule book!).

[QUOTE=Preposterous Ponies!;7989905]
What an interesting thread! I was considering getting my Springer involved in field trials, but after learning about the force fetch I don’t think that is something I would be comfortable with. Very good to know.[/QUOTE]

But as bicoastal noted, you can train the fetch without force.

I see a ‘variation’ in nosework. Most trainers do the type of training associated with NACSW. That’s what’s out there.

I was lucky to find a trainer who does nosework/barn hunt using the Fenzi method (different Fenzi instructors). She found that she got more reliable consistent alerts on her dog trained Fenzi than she did with her dog trained using the NACSW method.

You can find trainers that are willing to train without force but sounds like you gotta look for them as they are in the minority.

And, as with any trainer, watch some lessons and if you don’t like what you see, don’t go.

[QUOTE=Preposterous Ponies!;7989905]
What an interesting thread! I was considering getting my Springer involved in field trials, but after learning about the force fetch I don’t think that is something I would be comfortable with. Very good to know.[/QUOTE]

Well, also, how someone does “force fetch” depends a lot on the trainer too.

I don’t think it’s fair to use any pressure until the dog fully understands the command, so I don’t really support the idea of the ear pinch while training retrieve (as the video seemed to demonstrate).

I had to go back and regain “happy in the field looking for birds” because my field trainer yelled at my dog when he broke his “whoa.” (Well, he yelled “whoa” at him.) But, I think my dog was confused, and then thought he was in trouble…so he started “blinking” birds (deliberately ignoring them) because he didn’t want to get in trouble. So…even a little bit of pressure can be bad if they aren’t ready.

Some trainers are brutal in their methods - not just force fetch, but other things like teaching a dog to “whoa” by leaving it standing on a wobbly barrel for a long time (any time they move they lose their balance so they learn to be still). Some keep dogs in the kennel and their only reward in life is to hunt. No thanks. You definitely need to ask around.

If your dog likes to hunt, and isn’t averse to feathers, you can do a lot in the field without “force fetch” because most dogs do like to retrieve. Pointing dog Junior Hunt tests don’t even shoot, so no retrieve possible. Not sure about Springers, but I would assume the JH is the same for them. It’s about finding birds, and pointing (or whatever Springers do.) It’s only as they move up that a retrieve is necessary. Pointing dog Field Trials don’t shoot either - just a starters pistol and demonstrating steadiness to the shot. (Well, I’ve been told that sometimes the ones that place have some sort of retrieve test at the end of the Trial but that’s not very common. I’m not sure about Springer Field Trials though.)

I wouldn’t avoid field work if you’re interested. A retrieve isn’t used in competition at the entry levels, and by the time you need it you’ll know if you (and your dog) enjoy the sport and know people involved.

[QUOTE=TrotTrotPumpkn;7989944]
I don’t know what the proper term is, maybe “back chaining,” but I first teach hold with a wooden dowel. This can take forever, btw. Keep it short. Then hold and sit. then taking a step or two holding into the sit. So teach from the end of the exercise forward. [/QUOTE]

This sounds like what my obedience instructor does. We haven’t discussed it at length yet because we’re not ready. She also suggests doing this when they are puppies so that it’s just another game that can be turned into a command. (This, in contrast to a lot of gun dog trainers that don’t teach “fetch” until a dog is older and has already been working in the field.)

Thanks for the tips too – instructor said the same thing – you don’t want to lose points in the ring because of anything but your dog. So we need to learn, read, watch some competition, and enter matches before she thinks we should enter for real- otherwise it’s easy to make handler mistakes. I didn’t know about the leash position. :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=S1969;7989667]

Yes, I did notice. Just out of curiosity, you mention that you didn’t want to spend the $ on an e-collar. But are you opposed to using them, or you just don’t want to buy one? I use one, and have seen them used in many examples to put pressure on a dog to comply with a known command. They are not inherently inhumane; any more than food “deprivation”. [/QUOTE]

I am ambiguous about them. Because I see so much sloppy training, I think they are misused very, very often. I would not have enough use for one to spend the $200/$300 dollars and up, for a good one. I know the Tri Tronics hold their value but the cost/benefit for me isn’t there.

[QUOTE=S1969;7990045]
Well, also, how someone does “force fetch” depends a lot on the trainer too. [/QUOTE]
Absolutely!

I was told forcing the dog’s mouth open, jamming the dowel in there, and holding his muzzle shut over the dowel was not ‘force fetch.’ There was a whole lot of force going on! It wasn’t ear pinch or e-collar, but it was a very literal act of force + fetch.

“Force fetch” seems to have a different meaning for each sport/discipline and trainers within that sport.

PS- Do people call them disciplines like we do with horse sports? We should start that trend!

[QUOTE=S1969;7990045]
Well, also, how someone does “force fetch” depends a lot on the trainer too.

I don’t think it’s fair to use any pressure until the dog fully understands the command, so I don’t really support the idea of the ear pinch while training retrieve (as the video seemed to demonstrate).

I had to go back and regain “happy in the field looking for birds” because my field trainer yelled at my dog when he broke his “whoa.” (Well, he yelled “whoa” at him.) But, I think my dog was confused, and then thought he was in trouble…so he started “blinking” birds (deliberately ignoring them) because he didn’t want to get in trouble. So…even a little bit of pressure can be bad if they aren’t ready.

Some trainers are brutal in their methods - not just force fetch, but other things like teaching a dog to “whoa” by leaving it standing on a wobbly barrel for a long time (any time they move they lose their balance so they learn to be still). Some keep dogs in the kennel and their only reward in life is to hunt. No thanks. You definitely need to ask around.

If your dog likes to hunt, and isn’t averse to feathers, you can do a lot in the field without “force fetch” because most dogs do like to retrieve. Pointing dog Junior Hunt tests don’t even shoot, so no retrieve possible. Not sure about Springers, but I would assume the JH is the same for them. It’s about finding birds, and pointing (or whatever Springers do.) It’s only as they move up that a retrieve is necessary. Pointing dog Field Trials don’t shoot either - just a starters pistol and demonstrating steadiness to the shot. (Well, I’ve been told that sometimes the ones that place have some sort of retrieve test at the end of the Trial but that’s not very common. I’m not sure about Springer Field Trials though.)

I wouldn’t avoid field work if you’re interested. A retrieve isn’t used in competition at the entry levels, and by the time you need it you’ll know if you (and your dog) enjoy the sport and know people involved.[/QUOTE]

S1969, I know nothing about training field dogs, but as I mentioned, I have managed to train my Irish Wolfhound to do the Obedience excercise of retrieving a dumbbell using only positive reinforcement, and she has absolutely no natural retrieve.

She earned her Beginner Novice title, then her Companion Dog title with two High in Trials (full disclosure, these were at IW Specialities, so we were not giving the Border Collies any sort of competition!)

She sounds similar to your dog in that she can get her feelings hurt pretty easily. It sounds as if your dog was OK with the physical correction of the ecollar which is impersonal, but the trainer yelling at him was very “personal” and did bother him, at least it caused him to temporarily inhibit his behavior in a way that was undesirable.

The folks I train with have said not to repeat a command more sternly or louder if it is not obeyed, for those reasons (it is “personal” and can result in a loss of motivation), but also because you always want to give the command the same way, same tone of voice, etc. They may use an aversive, but if it is verbal, they are more likely to say “eh” than repeat the command. I cannot do even that with Tori, it would totally bum her out. The only “aversive” I’ve ever used with her, was when she started walking in on the recall. I used a long line, and gave her the tiniest bit of pressure (she is trained on a flat buckle collar). Now she flies back to me.

With her, I consider retrieving a personal favor to me, so have not done any aversives. Maybe it is different with a sporting dog where it is part of their “job”. So far, she has not ever refused to retrieve, but if she did, I would probably “help make her right” by going out with her.

Diane Baumen is a pretty tough cookie, I have been to her seminar and read her book, and I am pretty much afraid of her! ; )

Someone who does use some compulsion for some dogs in a little less “forceful” way is Terri Arnold, she has written some good books.

Maybe your dog will never fail to retrieve and you won’t have to use a correction. I know Tori would be totally grossed out by a bird with feathers, I would have to work pretty hard to convince her that that was a good idea!

She has dropped the dumbell a time or two, now that I think of it, by running into me so fast she has smashed it into me, but she always snatches it back up immediately with no additional command, and I haven’t corrected her, and it hasn’t become a habit.

Will your dog ever have to do a water retrieve? That would definitely be a deal-breaker for Tori! I mean, it would certainly be a challenge for us!!

I would not think my dog had a “natural retrieve” either - because he (like many Brittanys) think bumpers are stupid (unlike the GSPs we know). He will retrieve a shot bird because he finds birds irresistible…but for obedience/dumbbells, that will have to be trained. I’ve played this game with him so I know I can train him to do that; here’s an example of fetch with a bumper that I did in one night http://youtu.be/PCWF6wCGujk – so…I have some pieces that should go together if I try. I haven’t worked on this very much because I think I probably need to refine exactly what I want (e.g. what do I want “fetch” to mean – and how to break it into steps so I get the whole sequence).

I think the biggest problem I had in the field with my dog wasn’t so much the verbal correction versus e-collar but that I’m not sure he really knew what he was doing wrong (we had not trained “whoa” very much but the trainer corrected him pretty strongly for a beginner dog). I also have a theory that in a high adrenaline situation (bird field, or especially the training field with lots of birds, dogs and gunshots) everything is amplified. I felt his response was out of character for him but I think he was generally overwhelmed with stimuli it was too much for him to process so he shut down.

So now I am being really careful. I am not worried about him being corrected (in fact, I consider him to be really quite hard-headed) but I want to be sure that if I ask him to do something in a high adrenaline situation that he is ready. I want him to really understand “fetch” before ever having to practice with live birds, live gunshot, bracemates, etc. Which is why I want to start with dumbbells in a training classroom, and then try to transfer that to bumpers or birds outside, etc. etc.

As for water retrieves - my dog will happily retrieve a shot bird from the water. But a bumper? Nope. :slight_smile: In NAVHDA there is a lot of water work and I’m not sure he really will ever be good enough for that – the Utility Test has a 10 minute duck search (must swim and actively search for 10 minutes) and a separate blind water retrieve. It’s some serious bird work and a lot of obedience. AKC Hunt Tests are just birds, so we’ll start with those, and if we keep training and the water stuff works, maybe someday we’ll try for the Utility test.