[QUOTE=ynl063w;8791320]
Oh yes this is a great idea. Just like giving trophies and awards to every kid on every team, every kid who “graduates” from 6th grade, etc. Because hey, we’re ALL SPECIAL and we all deserve our 15 minutes of fame at the very least.
This is the Olympics. The emphasis should be on the winners. I’m sure the also-rans have gotten plenty of local coverage leading up to the Olympics, and you can likely find all the information you want on them with a simple Google search.[/QUOTE]
Maybe I misread the intent of the comment you’re responding to, but I also would like to hear more about some of the lesser-known athletes. And by that I do NOT mean about everybody down through 10th place. I’m no fan at all of the trophies for everybody philosophy. I mean people who are themselves winning medals or doing well in the pre-medal rounds in other events besides swimming. It seems like there is so much of him on TV this Olympics, even in non medal rounds.
An aide client of mine was just saying this yesterday. She has lovingly watched every Olympics in forever. One of her favorite things is seeing the variety of sports. She only gets the local broadcast channels, not cable, but she has watched the local broadcast channels, not cable, in past Olympics. She was saying yesterday how limited this Olympics was and that it showed less of a cross-sport selection than she could ever remember. She said, “I am so sick of seeing Michael Phelps. It’s great he’s winning for us, but aren’t other athletes there winning at anything else?”
I myself noted the “60-second Olympic update summarizing the action from today’s events” the other day on the radio. This comes on every hour on the radio station, and I often hear it while driving around to aide shifts. This was after Phillip had won the USA an individual bronze medal on that same day.
The time divided in their “summary of the action of today’s events” ran Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, Phelps, oh and also gymnastics. Tune in next hour for another look at what is happening in Rio." Okay, it’s only 60 seconds, but I could in 60 seconds say, “Michael Phelps won another X gold medals, Phillip Dutton won the individual bronze in equestrian, the gymnastics team won X, and these other USA athletes did X” and make their 60-second “summary of the action” cover more than (barely) 2 events. They were actually talking about Phelps’ future schedule (“he competes in this tomorrow, this day after tomorrow”) before they ever got down to mentioning gymnastics. And again, we had won medals in other events that day, medals they ignored in their “summary of the action of today’s events” in favor of giving us his schedule 2 and 3 days out.