[QUOTE=animaldoc;8712847]
What are the benefits to leaving the ovaries in an older female? She would still be at risk for stump pyometra, ovarian neoplasia and mammary carcinomas (and those risks are greatly reduced by just doing a more traditional OHE).
The only recognized benefit to removing only the uterus in dogs is the prevention of pregnancy, so if that’s your main goal, why not just do a tubal ligation?
Most vets I know are recommending later spay/neuter for the potential health benefits (with responsible owners). The real question gets to be when- males around/after one depending on size, females before/after the first heat. The exact timing to get most of the benefit with less of the risk is still to be determined.
None of the boarded surgeons/theriogenologists I have consulted recently are recommending hysterectomy in dogs.[/QUOTE]
Fair questions, for sure. As described in my first post, an Ovary Sparing Spay removes the uterus, cervix and Fallopian tubes, not “only” the uterus.
If done correctly, removing the entire uterus and cervix, there is no “stump” to develop stump pyo. (I also had a dog develop an open pyometra after her very first season, which required an immediate, traditional OHE. No argument about that being necessary; I informed the breeder, who had placed her with me as a show and potential breeding home, and she agreed.)
Main benefit that is important to me is reaching exceptional longevity, age 13 and over, in Rottweilers. Dr. Waters, supported by the the Gerald P. Murphy Cancer Foundation, developed the “Old Grey Muzzle” study, looking at Rotts (both male and female) that reach such ages. Not just reaching “old age” for the breed, but remaining healthy into old age. There is a strong association, for females, with retaining the ovaries and reaching “old age”. The “why” is not yet determined.
http://www.gpmcf.org/hro2015.html
I had the heartbreak of losing one female before she reached even 8 years. This was the one who was spayed (traditional OHE) at five months, and who also had the orthopedic issues.
I have kept my current female intact, as I was not sure if I might want a litter from her. She is actually in season right now, and I do not plan to breed her. With new (and yes, possibly controversial) information, I am willing to let this one keep her ovaries with the hope that she will reach “old age”. Following conventional wisdom/practices with my previous females did not result in any living longer than 10.5 years.
There are risks, as you point out. But ovaries are endocrine organs, and not just organs of reproduction. Letting them remain with an OSS may offer some benefit to attain old age, while removing the possibility of reproduction. I suppose I could also simply leave her intact, as I don’t really have any issue with her seasons, and she will not be exposed to any intact males during them.
My purpose in posting is to ask if others have considered OSS, have opted for an OSS for their female dog, and what they have experienced. And also, to raise the topic of OSS as an alternative to the traditional OHE spay.