These are my favorite parts…
Plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury if the injunction sought is not granted. Plaintiff has the right to keep unsavory people away from the horse shows that it oversees, even if only to prevent the appearance of impropriety (see, Matter of Tappis v New York State Racing and Wagering Bd., Harness Racing Div., 36 N.Y.2d 862, 864 [1975] ). Defendant pled guilty to most reprehensible actions. Plaintiff is certainly justified in avoiding actual or potential harm to its events, members, and reputation, not to mention the horses, by having Defendant barred from those events.
The equities balance in Plaintiff’s favor. Although Defendant would like to see his son at equestrian competitions, unfortunately for Defendant’s son Defendant is not permitted to do so. Defendant should have considered the consequences of his actions before he put himself in the position in which he is now. The equities balance in favor of Plaintiff who wants to keep Defendant, with his past, away from horse shows and competitions.
The Plaintiff is AHSA (now USEF) and the Defendant is Barney Ward, for those that don’t want to read the link in Acertainsmile’s post…