[QUOTE=lmlacross;8827917]
I agree that this is the prevailing wisdom in the Hunter ring (always better to go in the “softer” snaffle bit), but I’ve honestly always found this reduction a little silly. Why are we kidding ourselves? Just because the horse’s bit has a bit fat Dee cheek doesn’t mean the mouthpiece can’t be a double-twisted, ported, corkscrew lawn sprinkler.
If if it were up to me, I’d make no assumption about the softness of the bit based on its type (snaffle or pelham), I’d only be interested in how soft and happily the horse went in it. Still, I think that assumption (snaffle=mild bit, willing Hunter horsey) persists, and snaffles certainly remain the bit of choice on most American show hunters.
ETA: aaaaaaand I didn’t read orchid’s post right above mine. Basically, “what she said.” :-/[/QUOTE]
I have been riding Hunters for 35 years or so and all the barns I have been at use snaffle type Ds - Never seen the barbaric stuff you guys are talking about…
That’s sad that you have seen that…