PETA panties are wadded *originally re: docked tails on horses, train sidetracked & is now discussing dogs šŸ˜Ž

:rofl: :joy: :rofl: You must have PERFECT animals then who never blow you off once they know a command ā€¦ what a load of horse pucky!

I guarantee you, my belgians, with all their titles front & back, know what ā€œsitā€ means and yet when guests are pulling into the house, I can also guarantee for you that ā€œsitā€ is not in the set of ā€œcommands they will obey right at this instanceā€. So I donā€™t ask it of them - I ask them to do something ā€œactiveā€ with that energy that also allow my guests to get in the house without 150lbs of excited shepherd greeting them.

There are innumerable reasons why an animal wonā€™t obey a command they know (distraction, excitement threshold, pain, what have you) and itā€™s up to you as a trainer to figure out why youā€™re getting ignored and what to do about it. A poke on the shoulder, either with your finger or an e-collar, can totally be enough to break through an attention or excitement threshold.

6 Likes

We will never see eye to eye on this stuff, folks. Continue training your way, and we will continue proving you do NOT need a shock collar to train a hunting dog.

E-collars. Do. Not. Poke.

They SHOCK the dog. That is their explicit purpose. Quit candy coating it to make yourself feel better.

1 Like

I donā€™t think you understand R- or horse training.

A horse falls into the center and you use inside leg to push it out - thatā€™s R-
If they square up and stay straight, you take your leg off.
It has nothing to do with ā€œrepeat until it improves.ā€ How will it know WHAT to do unless youā€™re giving some command? Most commands in horse training are using legs or hands to apply pressure and then releasing when the response is acceptable.

A dog is called to recall and it doesnā€™t respond, you apply pressure (tone, vibrate, stim) until it turns toward you and you take it off. R-

You can use an e-collar for P+ but itā€™s not shocking a dog for biffs a command. You use P+ with a collar for something like fence fighting or barking. A bark collar is P+ Bark = shock.

1 Like

And TENS machines SHOCK horses (and people)! Doesnā€™t mean youā€™re causing your horse pain by using one on them, even though you totally can if you donā€™t know what youā€™re doing (sensing a theme here).

You seem to want people to be appalled by the fact that some folk use electricity to train their animals but levels are totally a thing most normal people understand.

If my dog responds to an e-collar, through their ruff, at a level I canā€™t feel on my bare skin, then yeah, it might be a ā€œshockā€ but Iā€™m betting itā€™s less pain-inducing than my finger poking them in the shoulder.

1 Like

Goodness, thatā€™s some over simplification (or, like S1969 said, you donā€™t understand training).

Horse or dog messes up a command - trainerā€™s first response is to ask why.

Is it a command the animal is expected to know? Is it still learning said command?

Was it set up for success (for the horse, well balanced to make the transition, for the dog, under itā€™s excitement/distraction threshold?)

If youā€™re pushing boundaries (most dogs get a solid down stay at home long before they can pull one off a the dog park), have you pushed too fast?

Is doing the command uncomfortable for the animal?

After you run through the mental checklist (which really, you should know the answers to all of these before you give the command), then you get to decide what the next step is, correction, ā€œeasierā€ command, reduce/retreat from stressful environment, what have you.

Are there bad ā€œtrainersā€ who go ā€œsit, ZAAAAPPP!ā€ Probably. Just like there are ā€œtrainersā€ that beat their horses around a course. Doesnā€™t mean e-collars are inherently evil just like a crop isnā€™t inherently evil.

2 Likes

Man, now I donā€™t know how to train horses.

You train your way. We will train our way. And we will see who is more reliable when itā€™s just the dog and the handler, no remotes and no collars. We have results to back our methods up. Do they take longer? Absolutely. But in the end, it makes for a dog who wants to do the work, and is happy. Our dogs donā€™t know what human inflicted pain is.

They never will. Period.

1 Like

No because you still keep responding in ways that suggest you donā€™t undestand what R- means.

There is nothing wrong with R-

It can be used to teach a dog to heel, a dog to fetch, it can be used to teach a horse to drive, or to ride.

You can use R+ to teach a horse many things, just like dogs.

But anytime you use pressure/release, itā€™s R-

Period.

And just editing to say that there is no need to physically apply pressure for R- to exist either. Clucking at a horse can be R-
You can use your voice to apply R- to a dog and you can also punish a dog with a verbal response.
It has nothing to do with human inflicted pain.

1 Like

The good e-collars have about 100 or so levels and they do not cause pain until you get up into those levels. I have a friend with a deaf dogā€¦ that collar has been a gift for them to communicate. The dog works on a 4-5 levelā€¦ the collar goes up to 127. I canā€™t personally feel anything below a 9 on my bare skin, and then itā€™s just a tingling.

Interestingly enough, my friend felt the same way and bought the specific collar because it has a vibrate function. The dog reacts way more to vibrate than he does to the low level stim. He much prefers the stim. If you touch the vibrate, he yelps and tucks tail. So your thoughts that vibrate is less evasive than stim is not correct, at least not for that dog.

1 Like

Good reading; https://thegundogclub.co.uk/books/

Tax;
HildaPoint

2 Likes

Ehhā€¦ not really surprising given the actual study methods. Not really comparable to owners handling their own dogs in highly stimulating environments.

As always, method should be tailored to the dog and the task. Itā€™s easy to teach a dog to do something with positive reinforcement. Itā€™s harder to teach a dog to not do something with positive reinforcement. The same is true for horses. Easy to teach them to lower their head for bridling with a clicker. Not as easy to teach them to not drift laterally into the center or the wall with positive reinforcement.

Just editing - so this morning I used R- to stall my horses for their breakfast. I have dutch doors and they were all snoozing in the paddock rather than standing in stalls. I applied ā€œpressureā€ to them by walking behind them until they chose to move to a stall and then I locked them in. I could see expressions of ā€œstressā€ by this - one was yawning, for example. I could have used R+ by calling them into each stall and rewarding them. But I didnā€™t.

Was the R- more stressful ā€“ 100% yes ā€“ thatā€™s WHY it works. Is it wrong, inappropriate, or abusive? Absolutely not.

4 Likes

Yepā€¦ study methods are flawed as they are not following up for several years to see the success or failures of the dogs.

Exactly.