<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bensmom:
Hilary – It sounds like you will be really pleased with the pour-in pads. I wonder if you’d need both? I wonder if pouring him at first with the equi-build (the black stuff) would give you the stabilization you need, without needing to do the bondo as well. Ben was the bondo foot king at one point, and we found that once we started pouring him, he grew more sole, and hoof wall, and his whole foot is more stable and we haven’t needed any bondo in ages. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Bensmom…you’re right…generally all that is needed to to stablize the foot and the rest will heal, strengthen, and grow. One thing that needs to be said about putting full support of any sort on the bottom of the foot…when the foot is supported in this method, it should be realized that there is a chance of resulting pressure points. These points can cause abscessing, sole corium damage, or other problems. The best thing to do is use hoof testers to find any sensative spots and relieve those particular places to prevent damage from pressure.
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Ok, Buzz is in wedge bars because he is pretty poorly conformed in front. When I bought him, he stood waaaay behind his feet, so to speak. On his left front, he has a hideous old bowed tendon (the leg turns out about 15-17 degrees in front without a little correction and yes, he is a cousin of Slew!
) and he had lonnnng toes and really low heels.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Are you sure that this is just a “conformational” fault? I agree that a twisted leg is a problem…and can obviously be genetic. However, when a horse stands under himself or behind his feet, then it is generally more likely a foot form problem. I have even seen horses so over at the knee that they could barely walk become sound and straight in leg and alignment in a few months.
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>The farrier trimmed him the first time, put fronts on the second time, and I was really unhappy. So, I met with the vet and we decided to shorten the toes and set the shoes back – farrier claimed I just wanted a second horse with a club foot, but he did it, and then stated that I was right, that was what this horse needed. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, I think that it is becoming apparent from this thread that this is the way to treat most pathologies. It was his long toes that were causing his heels to run forward and thus the whole foot moved forward. Here’s hoping the farrier learned that this is a correct foot form and didn’t go away thinking that it was just something that “this” horse needed.
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
He’s better but not 100%, so I start really thinking about this – i.e. I am dreaming about horse feet (I think there is a pattern here!) I realized that his boney column support is still bad, even with the short toes and farther back breakover. It occurs to me that to rotate through its motion, the fetlock joint is still having to go too far forward over the long toe, and worse yet, dropping way too far to the ground, since there is no support under it at all. Therefore, anything more than w/t work is going to probably aggravate a joint that is low on lubrication at this point anyway.
So, I ask for a shorter toe and we decide to see if the bar shoes help with his support issue.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good thinking!
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> They do, but he is still having an occasional flareup in his ankle…and we looked at his feet/conf really hard. We decided he still had a low/slightly underrun heel, so I asked my farrier if he could build these shoes into wedge shoes (I HATE wedge pads and though that would have helped the ankle, it would have further crushed those heels).<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good thinking again.
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>First, his ankle is finally standing more over his foot. He’s been back in almost daily work (he doesn’t do much, since he doesn’t KNOW anything) but some days he’s worked pretty hard, and the ankle has not flared up yet (I feel as if I am jinxing myself!) As we got started back to work, I did bute him lightly (1 gram at bedtime) if he worked really hard, just to be careful. He hasn’t had any bute in a while, and seems to be doing ok. The second benefit to this shoe is that while his heel isn’t really floated, it has been given room to expand, and darned if it isn’t growing down to meet the bar. We’d like to encourage the heel to do what the bar shoe is doing and that is our goal – to one day not need them. I don’t know if we’ll get there, but we are trying.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, this is exactly the premis behind correctly applying wedges…and it should work. How long has he been in the bar wedges? If the farrier is correctly addressing the heels and not just letting them sit there and do “their” thing, then his trimming should encourage correct downward growth (rather than forward) and it should happen relatively quickly…within a few months…unless the foot is growing slowly (like in the winter).
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>I wanted this type of shoe on Bear, who is the navicular horse, but his farrier doesn’t believe that the wedge on the bottom of the shoe works – like the KB shoe- he thinks that the wedge will just sink into the ground and not do what it is intended to do. I can see that argument, but it is obviously helping my horse and must work for others, or the idea wouldn’t have been developed.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yes, logic would make us believe that this is the case. However, I think that Ovnicek’s studies revealed why this works. He discovered that feral horses on soft ground develop something like a “hook” on their heels. It’s hard to explain, but the heel isn’t really high, but has more height to it in the rear in the form of what appear to be “hooks” (because of the scooped quarters that lead into them). These “hooks” break the ground surface and do sink…a system that is very similar to the exterior shoe wedges (my hubby useds bolts on each heel sometimes…even more chance of sinking). The facinating thing was that the heels were “highest” on the soft terrain horses and non-existant on the hard terrain horses…their heels never break the surface and land on top of it instead. The medium terrain horses had a heel somewhere in between the two extremes. The results were that regardless of the terrain, the working angle of the foot (from the dorsal hoof wall to the ground) evidenced no significant difference between the different terrain/hoof types.
Is this begining to make more sense all the time? 
Proud member of the * Hoof Fetish Clique *