I may have an obligation to report to SafeSport/USEF. I have no obligation to report what steps I have taken to people who are full of vitriole and have no interest in constructive conversation. How I have handled this is not up for your debate and use as a weapon against civil discourse.
4 Likes
It may be helpful for you to indicate what information is incomplete…
3 Likes
This, along with the comment, was what I meant to quote above.
Yes!!!
8 Likes
I can’t say anything more without giving my actual identity.
7 Likes
My post was a statement of opinion that, if there are pros falsely accusing other pros of misconduct covered under Safe Sport in order to advance themselves at the expense of the falsely accused, then the sport/industry/hunter world whatever you want to call it is pretty far under water ethically speaking.
I never said you had an obligation to report anyone.
Though if people know about such actions and do nothing, things will not get better…/Lorax mode off
16 Likes
Wellllllllllllllllllllll… We already know not to report a shamateur unless you want to be blacklisted. When there’s this much prestige/reputation/ money involved, it wouldn’t surprise me if someone decided to use Safesport as a means to temporarily get rid of the competition. That’s why I’m against anonymous reporting.
In the end? These issues are largely criminal issues and should be handled that way.
6 Likes
I’m right there with you. This is a law enforcement issue, and some people can and will try to take down the competition any chance they get. Not that this is false allegations or anything of the sort, but SafeSport should be secondary to a law enforcement investigation and not function independently for these very reasons.
4 Likes
I’m beginning to think that most people here have not bothered to actually read the SafeSport policies. If they have read them, then they must not have understood what they read, or there would not be so many uninformed posters here.
23 Likes
I did around the time of the training. Doesn’t mean I trust their process or investigative abilities. I can see turning it over to law enforcement and acting on those outcomes. I don’t think they should be investigating.
8 Likes
I find it really beyond comprehension when riders and trainers are finally held up to the same standards we are in other industries where minors are involved. Suddenly their rights are being trampled and “innocent” people are being persecuted.
Hypocrisy, thy name is “you.”
53 Likes
That’s an interesting point. Why not just have the rule be, “If a person has been found guilty in a court of law, Safesport will take action to ban them from competition” or something like that. Then the person has the due process guaranteed in our constitution, and we can have confidence in the outcome.
This reminds me of what was going on at college campuses, where a female student would make an allegation against a male student, there would be some non-transparent procedure that emphasized “believing the accuser,” and the male student would get expelled without having any real rights. There has been a lot of pushback and I believe legal action stemming from those tribunals, and it sounds like Safesport is ripe for the same.
12 Likes
IIRC, part of the Safe Sport process is to not only inform SS of a violation, but also inform the police if the complaint is of the nature of sexual assault.
5 Likes
Here’s an apropros article from Atlantic magazine about how these rape tribunals went so wrong on college campuses:
3 Likes
Maybe I have more faith in USEF and SafeSport than average.
Honest question, because I do not follow suspensions and penalties closely. How many cases have there been with 100% innocent people being incorrectly and inappropriately sanctioned by USEF?
I can name you plenty of cases where the guilty were unfairly punished, with either the “guilt” being distributed disproportionately (aka someone taking the fall), or the guilty receiving a more harsh/more lenient punishment than anticipated.
But it I have faith that if someone is innocent and falsely accused, it will come to light.
I also have faith that situations that lie in the gray area with non-predatory intentions, like the 18 year old and 20 year old relationship example, will not be punished.
Is there a justifiable reason other than general skepticism to believe otherwise?
As mentioned up thread, USEF membership is voluntary. We are not talking about constitutional rights here.
12 Likes
Do you realize who “they” are?
5 Likes
Based on reading the thread I’m guessing that there could be more than two people who have filed complaints.
9 Likes
But also think about this… the penalty is not a criminal penalty that is being handed down. SafeSport is not sending anyone to prison. They are merely recommending a sanction to the respective NGB, which the NGB then is the party to implement the sanction.
Think about it in the context of various professional licensing. I am an attorney and will use my profession as an example. There are a LOT of things that can get my license suspended or revoked that wouldn’t necessarily be something I could be criminally charged for. One example might be commingling client funds with my own. Mere commingling, meaning, the money lives in the same account, does not mean I have necessarily done any embezzling or taken money for fees not earned or thus committed any crime. But because it could easily allow for that, the rules generally prohibit that practice. Violating the rules is taken seriously. There are various other examples of dishonesty and the like which are not necessarily criminal but which calls into question an attorney’s fitness to practice law. Thus, if there’s a complaint, the disciplinary committee may make a recommendation to the state bar for sanctions against the attorney, which could include permanently revoking the license to practice, as an entirely separate action from any criminal case. I don’t hear many people complaining about wrongfully sanctioned attorneys. And yes, that kind of discipline surely impacts one’s livelihood and reputation.
Like a professional licensing body, SafeSport only has jurisdiction over certain individuals who are under the governance and disciplinary jurisdiction of USOC or a NGB. It’s not a replacement for the courts. It’s not really any different than USEF implementing a ban for someone who kills horses for insurance money. That also doesn’t mean that there couldn’t be a court action for insurance fraud. It just means the NGB doesn’t really want that person around any horse sports over which it has authority.
31 Likes
Where is SafeSport (putting aside the issue of it not being a governmental actor) depriving anyone of “life, liberty, or property” without due process of law?
20 Likes
Lots of people on fb shouting about how people’s livelihoods & jobs are at stake if they get safe sport suspension. You can still train at your own farms. Go to local shows.
As others have stated… most other sports have not had any issues with having to comply to SS rules. Most companies & business have policies against sexual harassment. The horse industry needs to get out of their bubble.
29 Likes
