Sad situations that are going to be happening too much...

[QUOTE=vineyridge;5162881]

Now I’m interested in something. Is it common in Europe for people to have dogproof livestock fences when they use herding or guard dogs for their livestock?[/QUOTE]

Oh, please. :rolleyes: I am not Thomas, but I’ve worked dogs on stock.

In the US (don’t know about the UK, but I bet it’s the same) working dogs are not left to roam when they’re not working. When they are working, they are doing a job, not running the roads. When they’re not working, they are confined. Traditionally they were either tied or caged in a barn. Nowadays they more usually live in the house and sleep in the bed. :lol:

Babe notwithstanding, stock dogs are not allowed access to stock except when they are working. Doing so will ruin the dog, if it’s not shot first for harassing the neighbor’s stock.

LGDs stay with their flocks. If they don’t, they’re not much use.

[QUOTE=Rivermeer;5162858]
CLEARLY, the horses were not PP’s priority. I just do not know how this is debatable.

Heather[/QUOTE]

If you can put “clearly” in caps, then you know more than the rest of us. Just what anyone actually knows about this situation is one of the reason this thread has continued for so long.

I’m neutral with respect to pintopiaffe’s animal husbandry. The only thing that caught my eye when I first read this thread was the OK shape the horses pictured seemed to be in. I compare that the to pics of animals AC do (finally) confiscate. From what I have seen, they always look much worse.

I assume that horses who look pretty good essentially tell the truth about the long term, day-to-day care they have received.

Realizing you are totally neglecting your own animals and either changing yourself or finding them a better place…THAT is love.

Thank you Okggo!

[QUOTE=vineyridge;5162881]
Thomas, the dogs that I hit that you keep bringing up were on my own property in my own driveway when I was going less than 5 mph. One dog chased the other in front of me. Neither was killed.

I’m definitely a heartless, cruel, and negligent person for not fencing my driveway off from the rest of my yard.

Dottie, I am responsible for. She got out of my truck while I was unloading garbage and ran off into our row crop fields. I didn’t take the time to get her back before I went down the road to my barn. I still grieve for her and feel guilt.

Now I’m interested in something. Is it common in Europe for people to have dogproof livestock fences when they use herding or guard dogs for their livestock? Because lovely board or stone fences certainly wouldn’t qualify.[/QUOTE] I don’t keep bringing your dogs up. YOU do! Your accounts of your opinions about fencing not being necessary are very well recorded and very well remembered by me. I just post when I see you trying to defend the indefensible. YOU spent long enough going on about how you had no fencing and giving reasons why it wasn’t necessary to contain your pack of mutts and I well remember you saying that after you’d run your dogs over that they ran off and you couldn’t find them - because you had no fencing!

So you’ve had how many run over or run away/gone missing/voluntarily moved to the neighbours?

Oh and yes it is normal and most common for farmers to keep their working dogs under control and safe and secure.

If you believe, for the most part, what the news reports way, what the neighbors have said, what some of PP’s friends have alluded to, then the scenario played out something like this:

The horses got loose from their electric tape pasture. The neighbors (or someone) tried to put them back in. Someone called AC because they were out. Out of concern that the tape fence was unable to properly contain them it was suggested by someone to put them in the round pen. But there was no water trough in the round pen and no hay.

If the water for the ones that got out was the bathtub, it is easy to understand the difficulty of getting that tub to the round pen. Same with a half eaten round bale of hay. That would be why there was no hay or water, or shelter either for that matter. (look at the pictures & video with the news stories)

So, since the AC is not in the business of reconfiguring someone’s private property and their was no sign of the owner (who did not respond to the notice) anywhere to fix this problem, they decided to seize all the animals and ensure their care and ensure they would not get out again causing hazard to themselves and others.

If it seemed as if they were abandoned, why on earth would they leave any animals there? And with a history of the cruelty charge less than a year old, isn’t this a reasonable course of action?

Of course all of this could be wrong. But it is a scenario that makes the most sense given the pieces we have. It is also possible that there is a conspiracy against PP. But if there is, I can’t imagine why she would leave her animals unprotected from the conspirators for a couple of weeks. But that’s just my opinion.

I am surprised that you are so willing to through the ACO under the bus on this. You know what a thankless, difficult job they have.

I also don’t understand why so many people think that horses must have body scores of 1 or 1.5 in order to be seized. How many people have been so frustrated with AC for waiting until they are, when the trend is clearly straight downhill?

In this case the big issue seems to be the lack of access to water. If the choice was between letting them run virtually free, but have access to water, or lock them in a round pen with no access to any water, what do you suggest they should have done differently?

Horses can certainly die of dehydration long before their body conditions are 1 or two. And frankly, at least some of those horses were underweight.

SCFarm

That was me (no need for you to be coy), and I only brought up the Pony Club manual because someone else had misrepresented what it said. As you are now - and misrepresenting what I said as well. You seem to do that a lot. Might want to look to that.

I wrote that the manual said pasture care was the best for ponies (as it does) and that it doesn’t say that ponies needed a waterproof roof (which it doesn’t). It does give a drawing for an appropriate shelter but also says that trees or a hedge are appropriate shelters as well. So as I originally stated, it does not say waterproof roofs or any sort of buildings are needed, and it does say that pasture care is the best way to keep your pony. I get that you may not like that it says this, but I suggest you take this up with Pony Club and not with me. :lol:

Liz

what some of PP’s friends have alluded to,

“friends” have not alluded to anything. Real friends are not in the business of throwing friends under the bus.

[QUOTE=prairiewind2;5162949]
That was me (no need for you to be coy), and I only brought up the Pony Club manual because someone else had misrepresented what it said. As you are now - and misrepresenting what I said as well. You seem to do that a lot. Might want to look to that.

I wrote that the manual said pasture care was the best for ponies (as it does) and that it doesn’t say that ponies needed a waterproof roof (which it doesn’t). It does give a drawing for an appropriate shelter but also says that trees or a hedge are appropriate shelters as well. So as I originally stated, it does not say waterproof roofs or any sort of buildings are needed, and it does say that pasture care is the best way to keep your pony. I get that you may not like that it says this, but I suggest you take this up with Pony Club and not with me. :lol:

Liz[/QUOTE]
How is this relevant? I’ve been reading this thread for days and I appreciate the many different sides of this discussion and the restraint of many if not most posters in passing judgment. But quoting the PC manual that grass pasture is best and debating proper shelter - run-in vs. natural trees, ditch, hedge seems ridiculous in light of the reality at PP’s farm. Where is the accessible lush grass? Where is the accessible shelter - natural or man-made?

I never read PP’s posts until the countdown before WEG. I really “virtually” like her, but had no idea that she was planning this once in a lifetime WEG experience while leaving her horses in fencing like that. The fencing is the issue here. Regardless if the horse sitter didn’t show up, or a horse overturned a water trough, or horses were penned after PP left, so were not able to reach hay and/or water. All this can’t be determined via this thread or news reports. But the fencing situation is obvious and that is the negligence that is worthy of at least impounding the horses for the safety of the horses and public.

As others have said, I wish the best for PP and her animals.

[QUOTE=snkstacres;5162878]
I said I would not post again but feel a need to explain a few things.[/QUOTE] Got to say that I am personally saddened that you find the need to seek to excuse PP and to challenge the actions of the authorities who took the decision that it was in the animals’ best interests to have them removed.

There is a huge difference between impounding loose animals and seizure of ones entire farm including cats and dogs.
I would sincerely hope that if there was suspected abandonment that all animals on the premises would be taken into possession.

Its my opinion that these animals were taken illegally, not that they should not have been taken.
Why? What information do you have over and above what has been published as public information.

If they were loose as suggested, then putting up a notice should not have been done at all. What, they couldnt have been hit in the 12 or 24 hour time period? They should have been impounded immediately for the safety of human and animal. Whether PP was home or at WEG. Impounding would mean she would face a fine for livestock at large, her fencing situation would have had to be rectified before return of said animals. The shelter law doesnt even come into effect here yet. Irreguardless of our opinions on shelter and what is and isnt necessary.
My understanding from the news reports is that they were loose and they were herded up and put in the pen to keep them safe from immediate danger and then the notice was posted to check if there was someone attending and to ask them to immediately phone AC when they saw the notice. The notice I saw looked like it had a 24 hour initial period and then amended to 12 hours. Nothing wrong with that!

Clearly AC didn’t get a call within the time period and so were entitled to believe there was no one in attendance. I believe that someone who has been in contact with PP said she didn’t even know the animals had been taken until considerably later. So clearly there was no one there to either ring AC or to tell her her horses had gone

But, these animals were siezed. Huge difference. Siezure means that all the animals from her property must be removed, she may not own any more again.
No it doesn’t! It only means that IF and WHEN it goes to trial and there’s a conviction and the sentence determines she’s not a suitable owner for the future.

So, the old dog who was boarded will be taken from her. The kitties of which there was no issue shall be removed forever, her horses sold at public auction.
clearly if the legal system determines that she’s had her chance and despite that she’s not a suitable owner now or any time in the future then it would be absurd and illogical to put the animals back there.

There is no happy medium here. She is either charged with cruelty or not. That being very very broad. There is a pending case already, its public information. Its pending because it remains an open file. AC is not visiting PP on a regular basis. If you are reported, there is a file, simple.
How do you know they’re not working with her ? Are you speaking to her? To them?

There were and are many things that could be improved upon here for sure but…charges of cruelty??? The reason so many cases dont end up in a court of law, and they should is because one has to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that, cruelty, neglect, starvation etc. etc. is done intentionally. With the intent to cause harm or suffering to said animal. You wonder why horses with body scores of 3 or less result only in us finding a new home for the horse, well, cruelty is hard hard hard to prove and it doesnt exist here either. Impound the animals, the horses, yes. Make sure the necessary work is done, yes, have PP pay the costs involved in keeping her horses, yes, that is responsibility. Remove every animal she owns, charge her with cruelty, NO.
I don’t know IF charges are to be brought. I don’t know WHAT charges are to be brought.

Do you? Or is this conjecture and hypothesis?

What I do know is that prior to charges being brought the case will be reviewed by prosecutors and they will determine what is appropriate in terms of securing a successful prosecution. If the evidence is there then the case will move forward and it will be what it will be.

Logically, AC could not find water to water the animals. Should I assume that these horses have not had water since she went off the grid a year ago. There is a certain amount here, that we dont even need our eyes to see to figure out. The animals clearly have had food and water, there were none there thin or dehydrated.
Look again. There were 2 thin horses in the video. Not starved to death. But thin. But dying of starvation isn’t the issue is it?

That’s just the tip of the iceberg! The issue here is that she’s left her horses without adequate fencing and without adequate supervision. They’re loose and at risk and seemingly abandoned when she’s having fun at the World Equestrian Games.

There wasnt a thing in the world wrong with a cat walking around the farm, why take that?
Because there’s no one there to look after the animals! No owner. No pet sitter. No one surfaced despite the posting of formal AC notice.

AC overstepped its boundaries but I know from experience, once the ball is rolling, it cant be stopped. Now to justify what they have done, the only things posted are going to be negative. They cant afford this either.
How do you know any of that? Are you saying there’s no democratic fair legal system and no due process in the USA?

If there is one of us here who can say, our horses never got loose, even more than once or twice (escape artists expose yourself), one person who can honestly say, every single time they went to there horses trough or bucket, they always had water, nothing ever happened to change that. Never had a leak in your barn roof, darn my new one does.
What the heck have you said that for. It’s not relevant. It’s not the same. PP doesn’t have fencing. She’s got a saggy single line of white tape with no electricity in.

I’m not assuming this, I saw it on the video and I’ve read for years about her fencing and escaping dilemmas!

She doesn’t have a leaky roof. She doesn’t even have a roof. Or a shelter!

And, how many people here posted there horses got a lot less than adequate care while they were gone inspite of there best efforts. I can honestly tell you guys, there would have been reason to sieze everything I own then. Well, if AC got called in at the right time that is.
And you’re proud of that? Or you seek to justify that two wrongs DO make a right!

I’m sincerely regretting sending you money now! I never had myself down as a sucker!

She’s hoisted by her own petard.

She’s had fence issues a long time and the following are her own words:

[I]April 2 2008:

I stress my 8.5 acres with 5-6 horses, which includes usually 4 adults, the rest are babies-3yo.

I would stress it LESS if I didn't do 24/7 turnout. If I were turning out even just for 1/2 the day I'd be ok. But 24/7 means the sacrifice areas are just horrible at certain times of the year (like coming right up. ) I would eventually love to really do the sacrifice areas right with gravel, but for now they are just dirt paddocks and dirt becomes mud when 4+ feet of snowpack melts.

IMO, the 2 acre per horse rule of thumb seems to be the most accurate.

I use my property to advantage, mare & young foal have the 'nursery' pasture whihc is a lovely slope yet with enough flat spots to rest and/or tear out full speed... I have three grass pastures to rotate, could make them a bit smaller and rotate better, but would loose running room, which I feel is important. Very little wasted space, the back lawn is pretty small, and I can fence off the driveway and they EAT the back lawn. I've never owned a lawnmower.[/I] 

[I]

November 21, 2008:

Argh. Winter fencing?

So it's not like I didn't have oh... 6 months to get to this point...

But, one of the horses managed to wreck THREE fence panels the other night. She wasn't hurt, miraculously. I might be able to salvage one of them.

She's very respectful of electric. I could do the area I need in polytape.

Only the ground is frozen now. VERY frozen. Like, I-won't-have-mud-until-April frozen. We've had about a week of temps below 20. Single digits at night.

I have metal t-posts or plastic step ins as options.

Tell me how on earth I can put them in?

Any other ideas? I am thinking of trying to grab some cattle panels and putting them every-other-panel with the pipe panels (they're only 5', so need to be raised--can't raise them without FENCE POSTS to put them on...

Grrrr... it's not like I didn't know winter was coming... I just thought that I'd have 'one more day off' to get things done. 


It was a pipe paddock. Completely pipe panels. I lovingly refer to it as my playpen. It WAS the 'safe' place. Stallion proof... foal proof... But not Watchipi proof. She's killed three panels altogether now since she's been here. It doesn't occur to her that she can't clear them, then she sort of just goes THROUGH and crushes them.

So the pipe panels/round pens are where she keeps her mares to keep the stallions from breeding them. And one keeps jumping into the panels…yikes.
[/I]

[I]

November 21 2008:

They nudged it out of place from time to time, but really DIDN'T ever move it. When they went through it, it was for things that they would've gone through ANY fence... and then it was easily repaired.

[/I]

[I]

January 9 2009:

The blue eyed blonde rising 2yo is happily munching hay, in the BACKYARD. I've put her in three times already in four hours. I cannot figure out where she is getting out. No one else is getting out.

She *did* get out once last week at the uncharged fenceline. I restrung, tightly, and no new hoofprints, and fence is untouched. No hoofprints from further down that fenceline (I didn't think to check the whole line in daylight--but in the full moon it's obvious she's not coming from that direction.

[/I]

[I]

July 11, 2009:

I am looking for something non-AC for rotational grazing.

Choices are solar, which I've not had much luck with--though I do HAVE one, and could try a new battery... but I think it's because I have such crappy ground. (23.5" no matter where you go, I'm on top of a granite mountain...)

So these others are either Gallagher or Zareba and can be AC or two different types of batteries.

Horses respect the fence if it's charged--but are evil incarnate if it's not. Once they 'get it' that it's not hot, they just lean/walk/push/barge through it. Two in particular. The rest follow. Peer pressure and all.

I can put in more ground rods--for my "good" stallion paddock I have 5 copper rods... but for a portable/rotational that's really kind of overkill work-wise, ya know?

[/I]

[I]July 22, 2009:

Warning: Do NOT drop a fresh bale OUTSIDE Of said fence and plan to feed it out.

You will NOT have fence left, will not have fresh bale left, and WILL have a muddy, mucky mess where you used to have driveway.[/I]

[I]

August 14 2009:

Last time I came home to horses on the back lawn, the gatepost and gate, which have survived hurricanes, blizzards, Ice Storms and flooding, was snapped off at the base, the gate somewhat crumpled, and the No Climb I had JUST PUT UP after his last foolish attempt at a cross species tryst is ruined. The HORSES were not in either pasture adjoining the gate or the no-climb.

[/I]

There are at least 7 more mentions of horses getting loose (new instances and not repeat ones) and a bunch more posts about her fences being destroyed, broken, ruined, not working, old, frayed, not enough ground rods in, cheap solar charger not working, extension cords to plug in charger not working, etc etc etc.

So she’s had serious fencing issues, broken fencing, non working fencing and admitted escapees on numerous occasions for substantial time. But plenty of shopping in all that time! And not for cheap stuff either. And unpaid time off and a flight to WEG and immediately after 2 new saddles purchased.

I’m not particularly concerned if things weren’t precisely by the book or if AC acted a little quickly. They evidently were there for a reason and even according to PP’s own account she was struggling to keep her horses properly contained and properly fed and properly sheltered from inclement weather.

Yet she’s shopping for saddles, giving it the big talk and getting in loaned mares and breeding more of the blighters! She’s already got a conviction for cruelty and each and everyone of us knows darned well that just doesn’t happen the first and only time that “stuff happens”.

So they might have acted a day too soon this time. I’d personally rather that though than a day too late. They might have taken them before they were freezing cold and had no hay and frozen water and were skating about on ice but again that doesn’t concern me. They might have taken them from behind some shabby bent gate tied to a cable drum and some saggy fence tape rather than scraped them off the front of a truck but again doesn’t worry me. They may even have already gelded the stallion but I’m not thinking that’s a huge detriment to either the horse itself or the world of horsedom! They might even be trying to rehome the whole lot to somewhere that prefers horse care and management over shopping.

I have confidence though that America is not some backwater without fair judicial system and no right to be heard. I’m darned if I can believe in a civilised democracy that this is all just a huge conspiracy to get PP!

[QUOTE=pAin’t_Misbehavin’;5162889]
Oh, please. :rolleyes: I am not Thomas, but I’ve worked dogs on stock.

In the US (don’t know about the UK, but I bet it’s the same) working dogs are not left to roam when they’re not working. When they are working, they are doing a job, not running the roads. When they’re not working, they are confined. Traditionally they were either tied or caged in a barn. Nowadays they more usually live in the house and sleep in the bed. :lol:

Babe notwithstanding, stock dogs are not allowed access to stock except when they are working. Doing so will ruin the dog, if it’s not shot first for harassing the neighbor’s stock.

LGDs stay with their flocks. If they don’t, they’re not much use.[/QUOTE]

Yep. I’ve been to several ranches with my BC that breed/train herding dogs. The dogs are in their kennels when not working. If they have “family” dogs, they are loose when the facilities are closed to the public, but the properites are entirely fenced. Two in my area (3 - 10 acres) are entirely done in chain link.

My propery is fenced and crossed fenced with several gates that horses would have to get thru to get to the street. Having seen horses escape from places (including public boarding facility) and hit/be hit by cars, I’m always mindful to close all the gates as anyone enters or leaves the property.

[QUOTE=Muggle Mom;5162976]
How is this relevant? I’ve been reading this thread for days and I appreciate the many different sides of this discussion and the restraint of many if not most posters in passing judgment. But quoting the PC manual that grass pasture is best and debating proper shelter - run-in vs. natural trees, ditch, hedge seems ridiculous in light of the reality at PP’s farm. Where is the accessible lush grass? Where is the accessible shelter - natural or man-made?

I never read PP’s posts until the countdown before WEG. I really “virtually” like her, but had no idea that she was planning this once in a lifetime WEG experience while leaving her horses in fencing like that. The fencing is the issue here. Regardless if the horse sitter didn’t show up, or a horse overturned a water trough, or horses were penned after PP left, so were not able to reach hay and/or water. All this can’t be determined via this thread or news reports. But the fencing situation is obvious and that is the negligence that is worthy of at least impounding the horses for the safety of the horses and public.

As others have said, I wish the best for PP and her animals.[/QUOTE]

I’ve said repeatedly (though there is no reason you should know this!) that I have no opinion on pp or her problems. I don’t trust what the government and the media report, for reasons I’ve stated elsewhere and need not be repeated. There are few known facts as far as I can see, and her horses didn’t look in bad shape. So without real facts, I have no opinion. (And if I did, I wouldn’t write about it here.)

The above post was as a result of a side thread. I am willing to talk about what seems to be the law in Maine - that horses need waterproof roofs. IMO, very little on this thread has been relevant or helpful, and so a different discussion was fine with me. The PC Manual wasn’t my idea! Someone else brought it up, and I replied. I thought the PC Manual had died down, but with Thomas misrepresenting both me and the manual, I had to write a correction.

I do understand that some people don’t like diversionary threads, but I don’t mind them. :slight_smile:

Liz

Wow, Thomas. Those posts are interesting, to say the least.

I understand that the subject of this thread has her ardent supporters and that’s great - loyalty is a good thing. However, if they would just say that gee, perhaps there are some issues that PP needs to address to ensure the safety and health of her horses, then I would guess this thread would die away. But to argue against what PP has posted herself (see above quotes in Thomas’ post), well it just goes against logic.

I am truly sorry if that came across poorly. Of course PP’s friends have not thrown her under the bus, nor spoken out against her in any way.

All I meant by that was this was the most likely scenario that could account for the fact that the horses both had water and did not, had hay and did not and were out loose, but were also in.

Her friends have alluded to the fact that PP did not leave her horses without hay, water or care. I believe them. I also believe that things went very wrong and AC was obligated to step in in the way that they did.

I don’t see villains here. I see a bunch people who were all trying to make things work and running into problems. My position is based on the fact that I believe that the owner is always ultimately responsible, no matter what.

I also believe that a conspiracy is rather unlikely. Not impossible, but unlikely. I also understand that laws must be in place and that people must work within those laws - even if those laws are sometimes imperfect. If some people think laws suck, try living in a society that doesn’t have any, or that gets to make them up as they go along.

Frankly, I think PP is very lucky to have people who are standing by her pretty much unconditionally. It is unusual in cases like these.

SCFarm

Frankly, I think PP is very lucky to have people who are standing by her pretty much unconditionally. It is unusual in cases like these

it’s doing the friend thing and helping her rather than piling on like a lot of people here who are just too happy to show their superiority.:wink:

crosscreeksp, I’m disappointed to see you villifying pintopiaffe when you of all people know that statements can be made that turn out not to be true in the long term, and that freak things can happen that could make people think a farm is not safe. Would you want people coming on here explaining why they are happy they didn’t send YOU a mare?

:lol::lol::lol:

gawd, you are something. Maybe you need to tell your drunk house guest to vacate the computer.

A sarcastic remark. And it cracked me up. Guilty as charged.

Considering you don’t live where I live, passing by run over cats, dogs, possums, armadillos…bloated from the summer heat…or a chance of getting nailed by a white tail deer jumping out of the woods at dawn or dusk…

Well, the idea of being guilty of cruelty for hitting - especially wild life - is so absurd even you should have gotten it.
In no way was there a reference to horses or lose life stock. Though I have to admit, the ‘fence’m out’ states amaze me…

And please don’t jump down Lori’s throat because she stated what so many of us tripped over: The fishy stench of the seizure. And unlike me, a gawker from 10 states over, Lori has been involved in AC work for a very long time, legal red tape and all.

Whatever–Have you ever heard of hyperbole??

MY point is that what some people could CHOOSE to see as neglect–often isn’t.

And as more and more people move into formerly rural areas-- many horse owners find themselves increasingly at odds with the newcomers who moved here to get away from the city-- but then try to “citify” the country.

Just from reading some of the things said about PP by her neighbors as well as their own apparent ignorance concerning horse care-- I believe that some of her predicament may be due to such neighbors-- something that is happening more and more in my own rural town.

Also, as others have noted, local authorities often seem to have “no problem” coming down on those without “connections” or those without sufficient resources to mount a sustained legal battle. I’m not the only person who has mentioned this as the norm in our legal system.

And then there is the gender bias that could be coming into play as well-- the “good ole boys” don’t like to see a woman alone succeed in general-- but especially when it comes to such traditionally “masculine” pursuits as farming and livestock breeding.

But if you want to talk about “logic” I don’t think that it was very “logical” for ACO to seize horses that were apparently in good flesh-- and that were apparently without food and water because neighbors had locked them in a round pen after claiming they were out. Did anyone actually see these horses “out” this time?

ACO in the same state allowed several horses to starve or nearly starve in a different case before taking action. Is that “logical”?

Oh- LLDM – SORRY for, um, YOUR issues.

I’d say, in the case of domestic stock, that it is the “caretakers” who are guilty. They placed the animal in harm’s way.

I admit I haven’t read all 70+ pages.
But I have a neighbour, who as we speak, is putting up a fenceline.
And the lumber for a shelter is being delivered tomorrow.

He’s a new neighbour- moved in last month. He’s got plenty else to do-with two tiny children, a wife and they both work. He’s got a half acre pasture that is kitty corner to my place.

I’ve returned his sheep to him 3 times in the last week. He got the sheep 2 weeks ago to help keep the grass in the pasture down. Last week the sheep discovered the pasture is only fenced on one side. He knows nothing of sheep. There is no barn, no shelter and they came fully fleeced at the start of the rainy season. He thought they would stay in the yard. Believe me I am tired of wrangling wet woolmops out of my flower beds.

But he’s a good neighbour. Hence, he’s out in the rain putting in fencing and building a shed. And he got them sheared a couple of days ago. He had to put them in the dog kennel to let them dry off for a day first. They were not happy. Sheep who want to be outside are NOISY!

And they’re only SHEEP! He knows nothing but he’s doing his best to take care of them.

A good neighbour.

Off topic but

If he truely knows NOTHING about sheep please tell him that sheep are very sensitive to copper. Also, at least here in VA, worms can kill sheep in a big hurry when it is hot.

Storey’s Guide to Raising Sheep
http://www.amazon.com/Storeys-Guide-Raising-Sheep-4th/dp/1603424598/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1287331746&sr=1-1
is a good resource