Any updates?
Nothing on the Facebook pages. Life goes on at Branscombāout at the shows with jumpers and a couple hunters. Jill riding a couple. Ivy riding most.
This article was just shared by Branscomb Farm Facebook page. Provides some clarity on exactly what was given to Chromatic immediately prior to his collapse, and some updates on USEFās stance on the death.
Good for her for not letting this go and fade away
Very glad she is continuing to press for answers
^^^^ This.
This whole thing is BS. Horses should not be on āroutineā injections, especially during competition.
It doesnāt take a medical degree or a veterinary degree to understand that the injection killed that horse. Anyone claiming otherwise is simply trying to cover their a**.
If I was the horseās owner, I would be looking to sue the bejesus out of the team vet and whoever gave him the directive to administer that injection, as well as USEF in general. Someone needs to suffer real consequences for a bone-headed policy that permits the off-label use of a drug known to cause anaphylaxis - and ESPECIALLY without notifying the horseās primary decision maker. It is absolutely despicable that they leaned on the horseās groom and coerced him into acquiescence. What a bunch of scumbags.
And to do that injection without having treatment for that potential anaphylaxis right there⦠š¤¦
Thatās the definition of negligence, isnāt it?
.
And then that dumbass explanation that the horse died from pulmonary hemorrhage which was a ridiculous CYA attempt that surely no competent vet would issue. What a cluster##ck. Heads should roll with this episode. I hope she does sue them.
The kitchen sink pharmacology being practiced at that level truly horrifies me.
Little or no rational basis for most of it.
Any medicine you give a horse or a human can have side effects folks. Iām not saying that the vet was right or wrong to give the injection, but one missing piece is how many times in the past that horse had had the injection WITHOUT adverse side effects. Knowing that piece of information would be helpful.
This was already been answered in previous posts and on the ownerās FB page. The answer is never.
So you are saying that even though the horse had been at the event for several days, the vet had not administered anything? That seems very odd.
I believe she was responding to your comment:
To which @enjoytheride responded:
Meaning AFAICR that the horse had never received that special blend.
Thanks for sharing.
It does provide some more clarity. It looks like he was given all these meds right before his death.
But⦠I didnāt see specifics as to HOW they were administered. Were they given via multiple injections⦠some IM and some IV? Or were multiple meds mixed together and given via one IV injection? That just seems strange to me.
What does seem very clear is that anaphylaxis was VERY likely the cause of death. Iām curious about the Traumeel and Arnica, and whether or not they were given via IV injections as well, and what the anaphylactic risks are.
I think the unspoken question at this point still has to do with team management, and what role they played in decision making on this particular medication plan for ārecoveryā.
You asked how many times the horse had the injection that killed it without a reaction. I answered that question. The horse has never had that injection.
"He mentioned the horse was not brought to the veterinarian who injected him because of a problem, but rather received āthese compounds that were supposed to help him recover or whatever the notion is there for the use of those.
āTwo of them had label warnings that it could produce anaphylaxis."
Just because an administration of a drug has never caused anaphylaxis does not mean it will not. The fact that the drugs to deal with anaphylaxis were not with the horse after the administration of drugs with warnings about anaphylaxis is just beyond the pale.
Thereās no way around that, āfolksā.
I am disgusted by the fact that USEF tried to obfuscate the horseās cause of death. That was an incredibly stupid and irresponsible thing to do (as was the injection given by the vet.) Was no one making decisions at USEF taught by their parents to face up to their mistakes and not try to lie their way out of it?
Theyāre supposed to be responsible adults managing an entity that is responsible for Equestrian sport in the U.S. our National Federation.
That they would shuffle and lie like a kid caught taking a cookie from a cookie jar just boggles the mind. Itās an absolute embarrassment for equestrian sport in the U.S.
Excellent article. Dr. Madigan (UCDavis) really straightens it out.
" 'Madigan observed, āif youāre using drugs that have on the label that it can produce anaphylaxis, you better be prepared with epinephrine and corticosteroids, IV fluids etc. or donāt do it. Then youād have to say, `is it worth the risk to help enhance the recovery?ā ā
As he sees it, āSports medicine went from treating sports-related injuries and things like that to trying to optimize performance of the equine athlete. But that shouldnāt really include the use of medications that produce at-risk.ā