I’m sorry, in what universe was the cocker spaniel craze short lived? It was at the top of the list for decades!
My primary complaint with doodles, after the problem with owners*, is that after the very uncommon, carefully bred F3 or F4 labradoodles that started the craze, the vast majority are F1 crosses generally produced from breeding stock that in no way represents the best/ideal standard of the breed (generational management of form as it relates to function as well as hereditary conditions) because you damn sure know they didn’t put the work into it and any breeder who does damn sure isn’t selling their stock to a doodle breeder. So your chance of getting a litter that is all over the place, temperament wise is pretty much the definition of an F1 cross. It gets even more interesting when they cross phenotypes like the Bernie doodle. I’m sure someone must have the low energy high obedience version, but of the 6 or so I have to deal with regularly, every one is high drive/high energy with all the indifference of a Bernie when it comes to responding to owner commands (mostly on their own schedule, which works out well with Bernie personality, poodle? Notsomuch).
And to the point about creating a new breed, that’s fine, but let’s be real here. A new breed isn’t a bunch of repeated F1 crosses, which is the doodle business. A new breed is somewhere down around F7 and becomes repeatable entirely within those subsequent generations. But the unfortunate reality is there are a lot, I mean A LOT of culls on the way whenever someone starts a new breed. How you ethically handle the culls is pretty much the exact opposite of how the current doodle business is playing out these days.
- The other complaint is they do seem to disproportionately attract the worst owners for their brand of high energy, probably because the vast majority of well adjusted owners are sticking with a breed that meets their needs or getting an F1 cross that doesn’t cost an arm and a leg, you know, one from your local shelter.