I read this article and really enjoyed it! I also sent it to a few friends w/ OTTBs. It’s part of what prompted me to ask the question.
I also saw Denny Emerson’s recent FB post, though (emphasis added): [INDENT]I am not so naive as to expect to gather up lots of high level dressage wins on a thoroughbred.
I would not expect to win most modern, short format 3-day events at intermediate or advanced on a full thoroughbred, with so much emphasis these days on dressage and show jumping…
I would not beat many Arabians in distance rides or races on a thoroughbred.
I would be a tiny minority at hunter-jumper shows in 2019 on a full thoroughbred.
But if I was a kid, and wanted to learn how to ride, to sit the trot, to see a distance, to ride in a trail ride, endurance or competitive trail, wanted to train a horse up to, say 3rd, 4th level in dressage, or jump up to, say, a meter 30 in jumper classes.or take a horse to Rolex, and I had, say, $5,000 or less to spend on a horse, and I wanted a horse who might well do any or all of those jobs that I just listed, there is only one choice—
The good old, reliable, time tested, royally bred American thoroughbred.
They have been stepping up and delivering for decades, there are plenty of them available, and anyone who can afford a horse can afford one of them.
This guy, Tense, raced 34 times and won about $50,000.
Let’s look at prices—Go to Europe, buy a lovely green prospect for, say, $25,000. Add $10,000 for your air fare and the cost of shipping, so you are at $35,000.
I could have gotten seven like Tense for that----
Sure, it is not for everyone, I do know that----But for those who can, what a fabulous chance for American riders—[/INDENT]
His comments that TBs may not be as successful at the upper levels in modern eventing (or in the Dressage or H/J worlds) made me think. This brings @EventerAJ’s comment to mind, too.
I absolutely take the point that you could buy 7 OTTBs off the track for the cost of one purpose-bred import of the same age, and that both could be equally likely to colic or break a leg in turnout, etc. If you have your own setup and have experience selecting and retraining horses off the track, that seems like a fairly easy call. But for someone without that capability, experience, and/or time for letdown/retraining, it occurs to me it may be more efficient to buy that more expensive purpose-bred horse from the start (or alternatively, to wait until an OTTB has “proven” itself at the lower levels to purchase it).
I suppose another question is: out of 7 purpose-bred UL prospects, how many tend to go on to compete at the upper levels? Out of 7 OTTB UL prospects of the same age, how many tend to go on to compete at the upper levels? If the numbers are fairly consistent across both categories (2 out of 7, for example) then it seems like OTTB wins hands down, even if it takes a bit longer to get them retrained for their new job. If the numbers are really skewed (1/7 OTTBs vs. 5/7 purpose-bred horses), it changes the equation a bit. I know it’s impossible to actually crunch these numbers, but it’s interesting to think about!
Thoughts?