[QUOTE=hurleycane;6865107]
It was a disappointment to me that Hannah was in the video to support the stacked horse venue and Inman’s comments. I had her in the same ball park as Nate -which is in the same show ring but none the less non-supportive of the stacked horse.
It is a valid place to be IMO.[/QUOTE]
I’m just wondering, and I’m not trying to bash you on this, sunridge, I’m serious. I’m curious to know why you think this.
To explain where I come from, I see it is they go to these shows and they give money to be in the classes, and many times because of who they are they aren’t even awarded a ribbon (I’m sure this is probably the case with the Jacksons). So they’ve just given away their time and money to show with people who are just going to go home and sore more horses. I don’t really see that as a good place to be. I’d rather see people like them support sound horse shows rather than fraternize with the enemy. We all know that money is what keeps them going–why continue to give it to them? When the money dries up, the soring will stop. (Hence Mike Inman’s whining on the video.)
The enemy doesn’t like a sound, natural horse–they WANT the artificial gait and enjoy watching it. A horse that isn’t sored usually isn’t “doing enough” to them. So it’s nothing but a losing situation for sound horse people.
So, I just wanted to know the logic behind why you think this is an okay place to be. That’s all–just want to learn others’ opinions!
Oh, and I agree that Hannah is not a “natural” trainer. Otherwise she wouldn’t use so many gadgets. She also needs to SIT UP for crying out loud–drives me nuts that she can’t sit a horse properly.