Tennessee Walking Horse Soring Issue *Update post 1*

No one will really admit to when soring first started, but the first horse to lift and extend and travel very fast around the show ring was Talk of the Town–the only horse to ever have won the Celebration WGC stake three times and he did it three years in a row–1951,52 &53. It is interesting to note that his abilities has been thought so little of earlier in his career that he had been gelded so the THREE-TIME World Grand Champion TWH left no offspring.

I am not old enough to have seen this horse perform, but I have spoken to several people and had family members who were old enough to have seen him and DID actually see him perform in the show ring.All of them say his speed was amazing as was his lift and reach in front. And all agreed that every exhibitor and trainer wanted a horse that moved like Talk of the Town.

And that is when trainers started wanting to ad pads and more weight-- and that is probably when some of them discovered, either by accident or through purposful experimentation, that adding some “hot stuff” to a horse’s pasterns would produce a “lik” similar to ToT’s.

For those who haven’t been involved with walkers as long as I and my family as well as my late husband and his family, I can assure you that there once wasn’t a strict “division” between “show” walkers and the rest of the TWHs. It was very common, and my family often talked about this as did ny husband’s family, for horses that were used regularly during the week for regular riding or driving, or to work cattle or even plow to be cleaned up on Saturday and taken to the shows, especially the little one-night shows.

Only very few horses, mainly those with the trainers in TN or the few with training barns were kept “exclusively” to be used as show horses. This started a litlte back when walking horses showed without pads or bell boots, or later chains, rollers and etc. But once all of that stuff got started, then almost any horse used as “show” horses were not ridden or used for any other thing than “showing” because really they could not be used for any other thing.

Can you imagine using a built-up padded horse to go for an afternoon trail ride, or to herd cattle or draw a cart on the road?

I believe, from talking with “old timers” that “something started” as far as the soring as early as the mid-1950s, but it wasn’t that noticable until the 1960s when you had some horses on the line up at the end of some classes with noticable trickles of blood on their hooves.

Along with that came loss of hair on the pasterns, which the trainers attributed to workig the horses with weighted bell boots. The boots wee supposed to be there to protect the horse from “calking” or cutting the rear of its fron’t hooves with its hind hooves – but many people suspected that these boots also had something to do with the horses “reaching out” further in front as well.

You could recognize a former show walker by their caloused and, in some cases almost naked, front pasterns. These abuses which left such visible proof f what was happening to those horses are what prompted the passaaage of the HPA-- especially the part of the HPA that is called the “scar rule”

And yes, through the years there have been several “expose’s” about what was going on behind the scenes-- first in magazines like Sports Illustrated and others. But what many of us thought would be the “big breakthrough” story was the CNN special report that aired in 1986.

Well there was some uproar and the denials, etc. started as Guilherme has mentioned. But NOTHING has ever come of this as far as real reform because each time the entrenched BL part of the show world, which obviously has a stranglehold on the largest and oldest breed registry the TWHBEA as well as most of the oldest and largest shows was able to outlast the critics until the furor dies down.

I am hoping this time things will FINALLY be different. Time will tell. But already the good ole boys are doing their dog and pony and smoke and mirror show that they are so good at doing. I am glad that Roy Exum is continuing to keep the issue of soring before the public with his column and articles.

But really for any REAL and lasting change to happen, the stacks of pads, heavy shoes, hoofbands and actions HAVE to be prohibited in the show ring and on the show grounds.It isn’t just the soring that is bad for the TWH. All that junk on their feet is bad for them, too and bad for the breed’s image.

This video shows how the gait changed over the years. Also shows Talk Of The Town in there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbZH3IbosI8

Changes in the riders too…seems they were able to NOT look like a monkey humping a coconut back then.

[QUOTE=MistyBlue;6351595]
This video shows how the gait changed over the years. Also shows Talk Of The Town in there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbZH3IbosI8

Changes in the riders too…seems they were able to NOT look like a monkey humping a coconut back then.[/QUOTE]

The first three horses in that video were lovely movers who look like they were fun to ride. After Talk of the Town, it looks like it all went downhill:no:

I agree :no:

Thanks for clearing that up bayou-bengal - about Monty quoting Johnson about this pledge to take his breeding stallions off stacks. It made no sense.I can in no way see a stacked stallion breeding live. Maybe they collect show-ready stallions and inseminate mares, if they dont end their show careers when a WGC is earned. I beleive Waterfall Farm is all set to collect, ship or do AI.

RE: the video - look where Strolling Jim’s rider was sitting. The video also shows the progression of sitting farther back to the crazy place on the horse’s back.

[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6349933]
Roy Exum trying to figure out all the double talk. Does make your head spin.

http://www.chattanoogan.com/2012/5/31/227298/Roy-Exum-It-Gets-Curiouser-and-Curiouser.aspx[/QUOTE]

I’m not a fan of his writing style, but I appreciate that he keeps at it and is beginning to highlight some of the contradictions.

The timing of the law, and the exclusion (huh?), is inexplicable. If I had the time, I’d review the tapes of the session to see if there’s any more insight into how it all occurred.

I really hope someone at TWHBEA and the other organizations read a copy of “Who Moved My Cheese” and realize, in time, the breed, the exhibitors, and the owners will be better off without the Big Lick.

It will be interesting to see how the trials go, and then I’m hoping enough interest will prompt Nightline to do another update. They could put together something pretty powerful.

[QUOTE=MistyBlue;6351595]
This video shows how the gait changed over the years. Also shows Talk Of The Town in there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbZH3IbosI8

Changes in the riders too…seems they were able to NOT look like a monkey humping a coconut back then.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for posting that video- I coud not find it to post it when I was talking about Talk of the Town, but it is one that clearly shows the decline of the natural running walk in favor of the Big Lick. Note that none of the horses in these videos were weraring the clains that are so pupular and have been for the last 30 years or so.

The earlier padded horses wore bell boots-- some of these were weighted. They were made of leather. The chains were used for workouts and in training, but the boots were worn in the ring at least through the 1973 WGC. It looks like the 1974 WGC Another Masterpice may have been wearing either chains or leather collars, but not the bell boots-- it you look carefully.

The leather collars were just that- rolled leather like the rolled leather dog collars that wes stuffed with lead weights inside the rolled part. That was stitched to form a tube where the lead could be put.

Those videos on youtube are very useful, and were made with the help of the TWHBEA and the TWHC becasue obviously both of these organizations can see “nothing wrong” with what has been don to the TWH through the years to acheive the Big Lick.

I had a quite the dialog going with the “What a Horse” guy from the video posted earlier. My posts showed right up and he answered right back. I had to explain tail nicking and rollkur to him or her (boy those guys really do live in their own little world) and I guess he ran out of stock answers after “the horses are not in pain”, because my last post hasn’t shown up and I got no answer.

My question was simple "why do the horses have to be shown Big Lick at all except for the whim of fashion? The best horses show brillance without it. I waiting for an answer. Guess they don’t have one.

[QUOTE=Rbow;6351871]
I’m not a fan of his writing style, but I appreciate that he keeps at it and is beginning to highlight some of the contradictions.

The timing of the law, and the exclusion (huh?), is inexplicable. If I had the time, I’d review the tapes of the session to see if there’s any more insight into how it all occurred.

I really hope someone at TWHBEA and the other organizations read a copy of “Who Moved My Cheese” and realize, in time, the breed, the exhibitors, and the owners will be better off without the Big Lick.

It will be interesting to see how the trials go, and then I’m hoping enough interest will prompt Nightline to do another update. They could put together something pretty powerful.[/QUOTE]

Could it be argued that soring or hitting the horse in the head were not training methods and therefor not allowed? What would it take to introduce an amendment to the law?

[QUOTE=carolprudm;6352774]
Could it be argued that soring or hitting the horse in the head were not training methods and therefor not allowed? [/QUOTE]

I hope so. I’m hoping maybe one of our legally-trained members would comment.

It just didn’t strike me as a “loophole”. More like permission.

I’m sure there’s more to the story and it’s probably the result of years of arbitration and is viewed as a “victory” for animal welfare. But again, the timing and the verbage is so poor in the context of the issue.

Rbow said “It just didn’t strike me as a “loophole”. More like permission.”
Well said ! It does not seem to mesh with the HPA at all. It could have been a great tool to prosecute sorers on a state and federal level. Wonder how long it will take for a test case. And speaking of cases, has anyone heard when McConnell goes to court in Fayette County ?

Drinkin coffee, readin Roy

http://www.chattanoogan.com/2012/6/2/227472/Roy-Exum-Im-No-Courageous-Hero.aspx

I just read 39-14-216. Here is a link to it.

http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/107/Bill/SB2759.pdf

The Statute does not, in any way, conflict with or hamper HPA enforcement. The HPA is narrow in its scope, applying only to things that affect interstate commerce (a Constitutional limit). This law is a general act and applies to any and all acts involving livestock within the State of TN.

There seems to be a lot of heartburn about Subsection (e)(7) which says:

I The following shall not be construed as aggravated cruelty to a livestock animal as defined in this section:

(7) Applying methods and equipment used to train livestock
animals.
[/I]

Many have interpreted this as some sort of permission for “business as usual.” IMO this is an incorrect interpretation.

Consider that under the listing of prohibited acts is “Administering electric shock to an animal.” Does this mean you can no longer use a small, electrified paddock to train a horse to electric fence? Does this mean that use of an electric fence is now a felony? Absent (7), above, the answer might well be “yes.” Would that be a Good Thing?

There are not too many things in the “laundry list” of prohibited acts that subsection (7) will bring into play. Further, if the provisions of (7) come in at all they will be in the form of an “affirmative defence” that will have to be pleaded and proved by the accused. It would interesting to hear how something like “Setting an animal on fire” could be construed as a legitimate training technique.

Before ANY conduct can be felonious it must be "
depraved and sadistic." This puts a resonable burden on the State to present evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that an accused has violated one or more sections of the Statute.

This Statute will not satisfy those who want to ban action devices, the BL process, etc. It seems to me to be a fair application of the power of the state to regulate livestock husbandry.

As with all things, YMMV.

G.

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20120603/NEWS01/306030043/Walking-horse-inspectors-find-more-violations-when-USDA-officials-scene?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE

Nothing we don’t already know, but at least still recieving coverage.

http://www.chattanoogan.com/2012/5/28/227094/Roy-Exum-Danes-Walking-Horse-Hearing.aspx

Reading Roy.

and we think lounging is bad, I’ve never seen anything like this before, poor horses.:no:

[QUOTE=Summit Springs Farm;6355280]
and we think lounging is bad, I’ve never seen anything like this before, poor horses.:no:[/QUOTE]

Please e-mail Judge Mattice asking him to impose the maximum sentence on McConnell. His e-mail is in first post in this thread. Thanks!!!

[QUOTE=walknsound;6355308]
Please e-mail Judge Mattice asking him to impose the maximum sentence on McConnell. His e-mail is in first post in this thread. Thanks!!![/QUOTE]

Done!

Thanks!

[QUOTE=Summit Springs Farm;6355664]
Done![/QUOTE]

Thanks soooo much!!!

An editorial from Janis Sontany, D-Nashville, represents District 53 in the Tennessee House of Representatives

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20120603/OPINION03/306030030/Rampant-soring-secret-no-longer

Rampant soring is a secret no longer
Tennesseans should demand more funding for inspections

Thanks, first, to the Humane Society of the United States for the undercover video showing the horrible beating being administered by horse maimer Jackie McConnell, who got off with probation because of his “health issues” — what absolute horse hockey.

His health issues apparently are not bad enough to keep him from whipping horses that are in too much pain to stand or beating them in the face with a wooden bat. If he is strong enough to act like that, he should be able to handle a prison sentence.

Secondly, thanks to The Tennessean for showcasing the corruptness of the Tennessee Walking Horse industry. While the public remains outraged over this abuse, many industry officials continue to claim that McConnell is an exception, not the rule. How can this be when several show judges, board members of TWH organizations, and an astounding number of trainers, have histories of violating the Horse Protection Act? Soring has been a well-kept dirty secret in this industry and it’s time for this nonsense to end.

I am also deeply troubled by claims of Rep. Pat Marsh of Shelbyville that The National Celebration has “gotten very, very serious” about ending soring. Revoking McConnell’s Hall of Fame title and his credentials somehow equates to “serious action?” McConnell, as well as 100 percent of the 2011 Riders Cup top 20 trainers, have histories of being cited for HPA violations. They can’t be that serious about ending soring if they continue to allow these people to compete.

Celebration officials are also claiming an almost perfect compliance rate at the 2011 event. However, the U.S. Department of Agriculture randomly inspected horses at the 2011 Celebration, and 100 percent of those horses tested positive for illegal foreign substances.

A bill filed this year by Rep. Andy Holt of Dresden would have banned sharing an undercover video, like the one by HSUS, with the media. How is that for trampling the First Amendment? Fortunately, this bill never got out of committee, but he promised to bring it back next year. It would prevent any fraudulent or illegal activity, including abuse of children, elderly, the disabled or animals from being released to the media.

Pettus Read, director of communications for Tennessee Farm Bureau, touched upon this issue in a recent article where he tried to shift the focus off McConnell and the abhorrent animal abuse by questioning the HSUS’ motives for releasing the footage to the public! It seems Mr. Read, or Farm Bureau, would have preferred that McConnell be prosecuted in the shadows so that the public would remain unaware of the horrendous cruelty that is commonplace in the TWH industry.

It is more than obvious that self-regulation doesn’t work. Inspections should be done by USDA-certified inspectors ONLY — not by people hired through the Walking Horse industry. Since when do we allow the fox to guard the henhouse? Please refer to Gail Kerr’s Tennessean column last Sunday for information to contact the Tennessee congressional delegation to demand more funding for certified inspectors at all horse shows and see where your elected officials stand.

My hope is that no one forgets this horrible animal abuse before the Tennessee Walking Horse Celebration in Shelbyville and that the stands are empty of spectators! I am urging all members of Congress to co-sponsor the federal bill to strengthen the law, toughen the penalties and provide adequate funding to give USDA the tools it needs to end this cruel practice once and for all.

This is the only message the Tennessee Walking Horse industry will understand. That we demand a thorough clean-up and NO MORE SORING!

Janis Sontany, D-Nashville, represents District 53 in the Tennessee House of Representatives

The writer of the editorial above, and many other people have missed the fact that the sentencing hearing is not until September 10, and that we all have time to write, or email the judge to ask that a stronger sentence be given.

See post #1 for judge contact info.