Tennessee Walking Horse Soring Issue *Update post 1*

aarpaso-- Well that’s easy to say-- but when you have thousands of dollars invested and years of breeding program behind you-- and the BL boys control all the shows, it is pretty darned hard to just load up your trailer EVERY time a trainer who sores shows up.

Plus there is always the implied threat that something “could” happen to you or your horses. No, many of us hoped that by refusing to show in those classes and by choosing to hire trainers who were “clean” as far as our flatshod horse classes went, we could change things from within.

When we realized it wasn’t going to happen, we DID ultimately pack up and leave not only the show rihg, but te breed association as well.

Letters and calls to local newspaper editors fell on deaf ears-- they had to make a living too-- and in Middle ennessee the BL tenticles streach far, wide and deep. The local Middle TN media picked their fights carefully. The BL just was something they didn’t want to go up against.

While I appreciate the accused is being tried for SORING, it is apparent it is apparent from video and other testimony that ciminal animal ABUSE, also actionable, is going on.

I am all for stopping SORING, but taking stacks and chains away from a ‘trainer’ who uses cattle prods, beats with sticks and brooms, has no empathy for a horse that is groaning and refuses to rise… will not stop the basic and inevitable sliding of the ‘trainer’ into ABUSE as it is normal to that individual.

As he is not being also prosecuted for ABUSE as a separate suit by the State of Tennessee, when apparently there is much evidence, what will change locally if there is a SORING conviction?

Will a federal judge impose the sentence or is that a local judge, too?
We’ll see how the suit shakes out.

It is long past time for the TWH to clean house regarding the shows their breed is displayed in. I don’t believe for a moment that ending the big lick display will devastate the breeding of TWH and ‘kill them off’.

Smart breed associations would be looking for the best alternative presentation their grand horses can give and promoting that, while simply not offering or supporting classes that the horses that are sored are able to show in.

On the other hand, telling anyone that ‘you can’t do X’ usually elicits the response ‘you can’t make me!’ and the discussion degenerates into ‘there ought to be a law to stop you…’
And here we are.

Any good ideas for bringing about the change you would like to see in the organizations that control the current shows and breeder organization?

-I don’t have a TWH; I’m not a member or past member of the TWBEA. There are many TWH in my area and they are wonderful horses working in many venues for their owners.

[QUOTE=D_BaldStockings;6433916]
Any good ideas for bringing about the change you would like to see in the organizations that control the current shows and breeder organization?[/QUOTE]

Good question. I’m thinking. (in this heat, a slow process)

as far as SHOWS go or the organizations,

your voting rights within that organization be revoked if you have HPA violations within the past 5 yrs.

if you have violations within the past 10 yrs you can NOT hold office in the ORGANIZATION ie TWHBEA SSH ect.

i think if this was in place NOW all but 2 board member of TWHBEA would/could be gone

SHOW (the HIO) would have NON a maybe one.PRIDE would be out too.

this in its self would put a real big DENT in the BIG YUCK

and to add just one more thing a Board member can not replace himself /herself with a family member if they have violations.

cause in the south its all in the FAMILY

[QUOTE=aarpaso;6436058]
as far as SHOWS go or the organizations,

your voting rights within that organization be revoked if you have HPA violations within the past 5 yrs.

if you have violations within the past 10 yrs you can NOT hold office in the ORGANIZATION ie TWHBEA SSH ect.

i think if this was in place NOW all but 2 board member of TWHBEA would/could be gone

SHOW (the HIO) would have NON a maybe one.PRIDE would be out too.

this in its self would put a real big DENT in the BIG YUCK

and to add just one more thing a Board member can not replace himself /herself with a family member if they have violations.

cause in the south its all in the FAMILY[/QUOTE]
So true about all in the family down here. Look how many trainers with violations go under their wive’s names and behind her skirts. Excellent ideas you mentioned.

[QUOTE=aarpaso;6436058]
as far as SHOWS go or the organizations,

your voting rights within that organization be revoked if you have HPA violations within the past 5 yrs.

if you have violations within the past 10 yrs you can NOT hold office in the ORGANIZATION ie TWHBEA SSH ect.

i think if this was in place NOW all but 2 board member of TWHBEA would/could be gone

SHOW (the HIO) would have NON a maybe one.PRIDE would be out too.

this in its self would put a real big DENT in the BIG YUCK

and to add just one more thing a Board member can not replace himself /herself with a family member if they have violations.

cause in the south its all in the FAMILY[/QUOTE]

Oh please. Tommy Manion jumped from QH to cutters when he cut his own throat in AQHA. Countless QH trainers ‘went yellow’ or ‘went spotted’ when they ran themselves out of luck in the QH world. If you’re a damned walking horse trainer, you gotta hide behind skirts b/c God knows there’s nowhere to go. it’s not like the Kentucky Mountain Rocky Gaited Spotted Horse Association shows will pay the mortgage.

It’s not a ‘southern thing’. It’s a pay the bills thing. it’s a horse-trainer-thing, and you know that.

PLEASE WHAT

I don’t give a flip to what or who they jump as long as its away from TWH,the question was what could be changed

stated: violation holders could not hold office in any of the organizations period, if this happened most if not all BOARD MEMBERS would be OUT of the TWHBEA

and yes most trainers will hid behind someone when having done wrong ,its a little boy thing do ya KNOW

[QUOTE=aarpaso;6436410]
PLEASE WHAT

I don’t give a flip to what or who they jump as long as its away from TWH,the question was what could be changed

stated: violation holders could not hold office in any of the organizations period, if this happened most if not all BOARD MEMBERS would be OUT of the TWHBEA

and yes most trainers will hid behind someone when having done wrong ,its a little boy thing do ya KNOW[/QUOTE]

In 1997-98 I was personally involved, with several others, in a proposal to do just this (i.e., disqualify HPA violators as TWHBEA leaders). We submitted a change to the Bylaws of the TWHBEA that would disqualify members for service as an Officer, Executive Committee Member*, or Director if they had received any HPA violations within five years.

You can guess just how far it got: nowhere.

In those days Bob Cherry, Executive Director of the TWHBEA, used to liken an HPA violation to a speeding ticket for a truck driver. They were “inevitable” in his view. I responded in several places with the answer that the HPA violation was not a “speeding ticket” but more in the nature of a DUI. That produced a full editorial in the VOICE with Cherry saying that some “nut” (moi :wink: ) was using the DUI analogy and how wrong it was. Note that he didn’t really address the issue, just vented about “nuts that don’t know the industry.” At least I was noticed. :cool:

BUT what also happened was deafening silence from some people that should have spoken up. That convinced me that the rank and file of the TWHBEA didn’t care about soring at all and didn’t want to “get involved.” That was a big part of my decision to leave the breed.

So here we are, decades later, having the same discussions. Sure you you’ve got the McConnell video to generate some heat but you see what the “industry” has done: they’ve closed ranks, hunkered down, changed the window dressing, and are just waiting for the storm to pass. And, again, the rank and file of the TWHBEA (and Walker world in general) stand silent.

G.

*The Executive Committee in those days consisted of the the Officers and a few Directors. They were the real power within the TWHBEA. I don’t know if that structure still exists.

That is the problem ! When people ask why there isnt change from within, its partly because many of the decent folks no longer pay TWHBEA dues and therefore cannot vote. And many TWH owners joined just for one year so they could transfer papers and no longer belong. In order to vote out the bad apples, decent people would have to rejoin, convince good people to run for board positions, etc. Who would organize this ? If it fell short, TWHBEA would just have more $ in its coffers and monkey business as usual.

I remember when that was going on Guilherme and had great hopes for change. Good on you for trying.

Are you saying we should join TWHBEA and work for change within the organization?

I know the proposed changes to the by-laws (like you personally worked on) were back on the ballot in the 2006-2007 timeframe. That is what prompted me to stop renewing membership. I could not believe an organization that claimed to be against soring would even entertain entrusting their leadership to known violators.

Things are a bit different this time. Social media creates a larger audience and more organization. Most significantly, in the past, nothing could be used to discredit the TWHBEA/“industry” claim that padded performance was not any more harmful to the animals than any other intense equine sport. The recent stand by the AVMA/AAEP gives us that.

The undercover video is damning in showing the abuse but most significantly in revealing the history of McConnell with the many “industry” awards in the mix with the many HPA violations he and his associates hold. They can change the window dressing but no one is buying that the “industry” has seriously been trying to eradicate soring.

Increased funding to the USDA to control this insignificant, perverse “sport” in light of the aggregate total spent to date to ineffectively control the problem, and the legitimate government programs currently being underfunded…well, that’s how we as horse people begin to lose our rights to use our horses any way we want. This is a prime example of where we as horse owners should police our own and work hard to eliminate the Big Lick.

[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6436879]
That is the problem ! When people ask why there isnt change from within, its partly because many of the decent folks no longer pay TWHBEA dues and therefore cannot vote. And many TWH owners joined just for one year so they could transfer papers and no longer belong. In order to vote out the bad apples, decent people would have to rejoin, convince good people to run for board positions, etc. Who would organize this ? If it fell short, TWHBEA would just have more $ in its coffers and monkey business as usual.

I remember when that was going on Guilherme and had great hopes for change. Good on you for trying.[/QUOTE]
I also remember that, and thanks Guilherme for trying. There would have to be good people counting votes, otherwise the results would be manipulated. Change from within is probably not going to happen.

Not to interrupt this chain of thought but here is the latest. The hearing for next Monday has been cancelled. It appears it will be settled out of court.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHOW, INC.; CONTENDER FARMS, L.L.P.; AND MIKE McGARTLAND,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
Defendant.

Civil Action No. 4:12-cv-429-Y
The Honorable Terry R. Means
JOINT STIPULATION TO CANCEL HEARING AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs SHOW, Inc., Contender Farms, and Mike McGartland and Defendant United States Department of Agriculture, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to a cancellation of the consolidated hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for preliminary injunction and trial on the merits, currently set for July 16, 2012 at 10 a.m.

The parties agree that the combined hearing and trial is unnecessary in this case and that final resolution should be reached based on cross-motions for judgment on the evidentiary record as determined by to the Court. However, the parties disagree about what evidence the Court can consider when reviewing an agency’s decision. Accordingly, the parties submit the following schedule for briefing what should
constitute the evidentiary record before the Court and the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims:

Plaintiffs will file their evidence with the court on July 16, 2012, per the court's prior order, Case 4:12-cv-00429-Y Document 22 Filed 07/12/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID 641
Defendant shall have until Tuesday, July 17, 2012 to submit all documents and things that they believe should be considered by the Court in this case.
A party may file a motion seeking to exclude all or part of another party's submission no later than August 7, 2012. The submitting party shall have twenty one days to respond to the motion.
Once the Court has ruled on all outstanding motions concerning the scope of the record in this case, the parties shall submit a proposed briefing schedule for resolving the merits of Plaintiffs' claims.

Dated: July 12, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
STUART F. DELERY
Acting Assistant Attorney General
SARAH R. SALDAÑA
United States Attorney
JOHN R. GRIFFITHS
Assistant Branch Director
/s/ Nathan M. Swinton
NATHAN M. SWINTON (NY Bar)
JOSEPH W. MEAD (MI Bar)
Trial Attorneys
Federal Programs Branch
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Telephone: (202) 305-7667
Fax: (202) 616-8470
Email: Nathan.M.Swinton@usdoj.gov
Counsel for Defendant
s/Karin Cagle_____________
KARIN CAGLE
Texas State Bar No. 24043588
Kirkley & Berryman, L.L.P
Case 4:12-cv-00429-Y Document 22 Filed 07/12/12 Page 2 of 3 PageID 642
3
100 N. Forest Park Blvd., Suite 220
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
E-mail:kcagle@kbblawyers.com
Tel. 817.335.3311
Fax: 817.335.3373
DAVID BROILES
Texas State Bar No. 03054500
2400 Indian Cove
Fort Worth, Texas 76108
Email:davidbroiles@gmail.com
Tel. 817-246-7801
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Case 4:12-cv-00429-Y Document 22 Filed 07/12/12 Page 3 of 3 PageID 643

[QUOTE=Rbow;6436902]
Are you saying we should join TWHBEA and work for change within the organization?

I know the proposed changes to the by-laws (like you personally worked on) were back on the ballot in the 2006-2007 timeframe. That is what prompted me to stop renewing membership. I could not believe an organization that claimed to be against soring would even entertain entrusting their leadership to known violators.

Things are a bit different this time. Social media creates a larger audience and more organization. Most significantly, in the past, nothing could be used to discredit the TWHBEA/“industry” claim that padded performance was not any more harmful to the animals than any other intense equine sport. The recent stand by the AVMA/AAEP gives us that.

The undercover video is damning in showing the abuse but most significantly in revealing the history of McConnell with the many “industry” awards in the mix with the many HPA violations he and his associates hold. They can change the window dressing but no one is buying that the “industry” has seriously been trying to eradicate soring.

Increased funding to the USDA to control this insignificant, perverse “sport” in light of the aggregate total spent to date to ineffectively control the problem, and the legitimate government programs currently being underfunded…well, that’s how we as horse people begin to lose our rights to use our horses any way we want. This is a prime example of where we as horse owners should police our own and work hard to eliminate the Big Lick.[/QUOTE]

Pushing for increased TWHBEA membership in the peripheral areas (where soring and the BL are fairly rare) was part of the plan. The TWHBEA then altered the bylaws to dilute the voting power of the non-core states on the BofD.

The TWHBEA is a private entity. “One man, one vote” does not necessarily apply. If a membership push that looked effective did emerge you’d see another change in the bylaws that would frustrate it. There are many legal ways to do that the the TWHBEA hires smart lawyers.

So such a program might work over time, but you’re looking at several years.

The power to change the Association rests in the hands of its members. They didn’t want to do it in 1998; or in your effort in 2007; nor do I see much interest today.

G.

than WHAT

is the only way to stop this is by the courtroom.would it be wise to e-mail Nathan M.Swinton,let him know how some of us feel.give him the stats on these people.

let him know that alot of TWH owners want HPA to have more teeth.
What if He went to that hearing with a long list of e-mails or in hand e-mails.

we have to keep donig things to set the SHELBYVILLE SLIME on its BUTT.

stopping them would really speak LOUD to all TWH owners and to TWHBEA.

[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6436919]
… [/QUOTE]

Just for reference, here are the rules the USDA is being sued over in the case referenced (see post link above)

[INDENT]USDA rules

Dr. Rachel Cezar, the National Horse Proctection Coordinator for the USDA, outlined the protocol of the mandatory penalties for horse industry stakeholders last month: They are:

  • Bilateral sore: The horse would be dismissed from the remainder of the show. First offense, one year; Second offense, two years; Third offense, three years.

  • Unilateral sore: Dismissed from the remainder of the show. First offense, 60 days; Second offense, 120 days; Third offense, one year.

  • Scar rule: Dismissed from the remainder of the show. First offense, two weeks; Second offense, 60 days; Third offense, one year.

  • Foreign substance or equipment violation: Dismissed from the remainder of the show with two weeks suspension.

  • Suspension violation: six months

All HIOs must have an appeal process with the appeal taking place within 60 days. The results of the hearing must be reported to USDA within 30 days of the ruling.

Cezar explained that the penalty follows the manager, trainer, owner, rider, custodian or transporter whichever is applicable, but does not follow the horse or the show management.

A clarification issued by the USDA in late June stated that those found in violation by an HIO are only suspended from participating in the events the HIO is affiliated with, and are not precluded from participating in shows affiliated with other HIO’s.

But HIOs and show managers can still choose to honor suspensions issued by other HIOs, and all HIOs and show managers are required under the Horse Protection Act to recognize USDA federal disqualification periods[/INDENT]

[QUOTE=hurleycane;6438292]
Just for reference, here are the rules the USDA is being sued over in the case referenced (see post link above)

[INDENT]USDA rules

Dr. Rachel Cezar, the National Horse Proctection Coordinator for the USDA, outlined the protocol of the mandatory penalties for horse industry stakeholders last month: They are:

  • Bilateral sore: The horse would be dismissed from the remainder of the show. First offense, one year; Second offense, two years; Third offense, three years.

  • Unilateral sore: Dismissed from the remainder of the show. First offense, 60 days; Second offense, 120 days; Third offense, one year.

  • Scar rule: Dismissed from the remainder of the show. First offense, two weeks; Second offense, 60 days; Third offense, one year.

  • Foreign substance or equipment violation: Dismissed from the remainder of the show with two weeks suspension.

  • Suspension violation: six months

All HIOs must have an appeal process with the appeal taking place within 60 days. The results of the hearing must be reported to USDA within 30 days of the ruling.

Cezar explained that the penalty follows the manager, trainer, owner, rider, custodian or transporter whichever is applicable, but does not follow the horse or the show management.

A clarification issued by the USDA in late June stated that those found in violation by an HIO are only suspended from participating in the events the HIO is affiliated with, and are not precluded from participating in shows affiliated with other HIO’s.

But HIOs and show managers can still choose to honor suspensions issued by other HIOs, and all HIOs and show managers are required under the Horse Protection Act to recognize USDA federal disqualification periods[/INDENT][/QUOTE]

Thanks for posting for clarification Hurley.

so what i’m getting here is the folks in SHOW Inc. don’t want to play by the same rules as other HIO.

or Mike McGartland has a violation that could/would keep him from showing at the celebration. his horse will not pass inspection.

there is more to this,its not just MONEY.

http://chattanoogan.com/2012/7/16/230329/Roy-Exum-The-Rage-Over-Horses-Mounts.aspx

Roy Exum: The Rage Over Horses Mounts
Monday, July 16, 2012 - by Roy Exum

An eagerly-awaited showdown between the “dark side” of the Tennessee Walking Horse industry and the U.S. Department of Agriculture was scheduled to begin in far-away Texas today but the hearing has been cancelled, instead allowing both sides to file legal briefs in a process that will delay any gun slingin’ or – worse – not bring further reform to a shattered horse industry until September at the earliest.

If you’ll check your calendar, the 74th Annual Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration will be held Aug. 22 through Sept. 1 in Shelbyville and will slip nicely under the wire. And many hope it will be the last stand for the “Big Lick” people, as the criminals and cheaters have now been loosely labeled, because the once-noble Shelbyville show is being increasing scrutinized as what may be the most deplorable sporting event in America.

For well over half a century a despicable few among the many thousands of owners, trainers and riders have bought their blue ribbons rather than earn them with their abused horses. They cheat by using caustic chemicals, nails, imbedded objects and other sadistic means to force the horses to pick up their agonized front feet higher in what is called the “Big Lick.”

Shelbyville organizers swear there are only isolated cases but in a letter that appeared in the Nashville Tennessean last Thursday, Keith Dane, the director of equine protection for the Humane Society of the United States, wrote that is certainly not true. “There is ample evidence that soring is pervasive and not limited to ‘a few bad actors.’ “

In 2011, the U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted random testing for the use of prohibited foreign substances on horses at various walking horse competitions, and a shocking 97.6 percent of horses tested positive,” Dane wrote.

He also revealed, “Between 2010 and 2011, 100 percent of the top 20 trainers in the industry’s Riders Cup program were cited for (161) violations of the Horse Protection Act. What the horses, and the sport, need are strong regulations and unwavering enforcement, not a group of conflicted players claiming to be the right gang to clean up the industry.”

There are encouraging signs that badly-needed reform is coming. Horse abuse is now punishable as a felony in Tennessee and five men have already pleaded guilty this year to violating the Horse Protection Act in Federal Court in what is believed to be the first time the 40-year-old law has successfully been prosecuted. The guilty pleas show federal investigators and prosecutors are actively searching for other shady trainers and their employees.

A nauseating video appeared in May on ABC News Nightline and its star, a notorious trainer named Jackie McConnell, will be sentenced on federal charges Sept. 10 before 14 counts of unrelated state charges of cruelty will be heard in Fayette, Tn., later in September. One trainer has already done a stint in jail but federal laws are still lax.

The video, where McConnell is shown beating one horse with an electric cattle prod, has been seen by millions of viewers and opened a floodgate of rage and protest towards the Walking Horse industry and, more particularly, its leadership based in Shelbyville. Pepsi immediately dropped its sponsorship and a quick study showed the various boards are riddled with past violators of the federal act. One even tried to have the Humane Society’s Dane barred from the board. Two of the leading veterinarian groups in the country have issued a public demand that chains and padding, or stacks, be totally eliminated from the Walking Horse industry and several states have pending litigation to ban “performance horses” because the cheating and cruelty is so widespread. Some charity shows say they’ll ban any padded horses with the cry, “No more crippled horses for crippled children.”

But, worst of all, is the uprising from 95 percent of the Tennessee Walking Horse owners and riders. The outcry is reaching a nationwide crescendo after years of abuse that has been hidden, ignored, shunned and mocked. It is obvious, with the pending lawsuit against the USDA, the Shelbyville contingent is content to leave its empire status quo.

An avid horsewoman from Michigan sent an email this week that said, in part, “What these creeps our don’t think of is that as the pressure is on, we no longer purchase horses from Tenn., no longer patronize those TWH related businesses, no longer breed or buy semen down there, no longer travel there for TWH related business and many are moving to other breeds to have a healthy atmosphere for the children to show.”

The USDA’s stronger inspection regulations went into effect last Monday and some sense there could be a greater presence of inspectors, investigators and even state and federal prosecutors at the Celebration in August. There will also be a noticeable number of empty seats. Many owners and riders are avoiding the Shelbyville show and are in search of fast-growing groups like FOSH – Friends of Sound Horses.

Others are writing to Congress and other political leaders, begging them to stop the criminals, including the owners who pay trainers to cheat. They demand to know who owned the horses shown being abused in the McConnell video, for example, and want them held accountable. But, more than anything, they want to drive out the “underbelly” of the Tennessee Walking Horse industry and to be assured that the animals will not suffer at the hands of sadistic thugs ever again.

[QUOTE=WalkInTheWoods;6439666]
http://chattanoogan.com/2012/7/16/230329/Roy-Exum-The-Rage-Over-Horses-Mounts.aspx

Roy Exum: The Rage Over Horses Mounts
Monday, July 16, 2012 - by Roy Exum

An eagerly-awaited showdown between the “dark side” of the Tennessee Walking Horse industry and the U.S. Department of Agriculture was scheduled to begin in far-away Texas today but the hearing has been cancelled, instead allowing both sides to file legal briefs in a process that will delay any gun slingin’ or – worse – not bring further reform to a shattered horse industry until September at the earliest.

If you’ll check your calendar, the 74th Annual Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration will be held Aug. 22 through Sept. 1 in Shelbyville and will slip nicely under the wire. And many hope it will be the last stand for the “Big Lick” people, as the criminals and cheaters have now been loosely labeled, because the once-noble Shelbyville show is being increasing scrutinized as what may be the most deplorable sporting event in America.

For well over half a century a despicable few among the many thousands of owners, trainers and riders have bought their blue ribbons rather than earn them with their abused horses. They cheat by using caustic chemicals, nails, imbedded objects and other sadistic means to force the horses to pick up their agonized front feet higher in what is called the “Big Lick.”

Shelbyville organizers swear there are only isolated cases but in a letter that appeared in the Nashville Tennessean last Thursday, Keith Dane, the director of equine protection for the Humane Society of the United States, wrote that is certainly not true. "There is ample evidence that soring is pervasive and not limited to ‘a few bad actors.’ "

In 2011, the U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted random testing for the use of prohibited foreign substances on horses at various walking horse competitions, and a shocking 97.6 percent of horses tested positive," Dane wrote.

He also revealed, “Between 2010 and 2011, 100 percent of the top 20 trainers in the industry’s Riders Cup program were cited for (161) violations of the Horse Protection Act. What the horses, and the sport, need are strong regulations and unwavering enforcement, not a group of conflicted players claiming to be the right gang to clean up the industry.”

There are encouraging signs that badly-needed reform is coming. Horse abuse is now punishable as a felony in Tennessee and five men have already pleaded guilty this year to violating the Horse Protection Act in Federal Court in what is believed to be the first time the 40-year-old law has successfully been prosecuted. The guilty pleas show federal investigators and prosecutors are actively searching for other shady trainers and their employees.

A nauseating video appeared in May on ABC News Nightline and its star, a notorious trainer named Jackie McConnell, will be sentenced on federal charges Sept. 10 before 14 counts of unrelated state charges of cruelty will be heard in Fayette, Tn., later in September. One trainer has already done a stint in jail but federal laws are still lax.

The video, where McConnell is shown beating one horse with an electric cattle prod, has been seen by millions of viewers and opened a floodgate of rage and protest towards the Walking Horse industry and, more particularly, its leadership based in Shelbyville. Pepsi immediately dropped its sponsorship and a quick study showed the various boards are riddled with past violators of the federal act. One even tried to have the Humane Society’s Dane barred from the board. Two of the leading veterinarian groups in the country have issued a public demand that chains and padding, or stacks, be totally eliminated from the Walking Horse industry and several states have pending litigation to ban “performance horses” because the cheating and cruelty is so widespread. Some charity shows say they’ll ban any padded horses with the cry, “No more crippled horses for crippled children.”

But, worst of all, is the uprising from 95 percent of the Tennessee Walking Horse owners and riders. The outcry is reaching a nationwide crescendo after years of abuse that has been hidden, ignored, shunned and mocked. It is obvious, with the pending lawsuit against the USDA, the Shelbyville contingent is content to leave its empire status quo.

An avid horsewoman from Michigan sent an email this week that said, in part, “What these creeps our don’t think of is that as the pressure is on, we no longer purchase horses from Tenn., no longer patronize those TWH related businesses, no longer breed or buy semen down there, no longer travel there for TWH related business and many are moving to other breeds to have a healthy atmosphere for the children to show.”

The USDA’s stronger inspection regulations went into effect last Monday and some sense there could be a greater presence of inspectors, investigators and even state and federal prosecutors at the Celebration in August. There will also be a noticeable number of empty seats. Many owners and riders are avoiding the Shelbyville show and are in search of fast-growing groups like FOSH – Friends of Sound Horses.

Others are writing to Congress and other political leaders, begging them to stop the criminals, including the owners who pay trainers to cheat. They demand to know who owned the horses shown being abused in the McConnell video, for example, and want them held accountable. But, more than anything, they want to drive out the “underbelly” of the Tennessee Walking Horse industry and to be assured that the animals will not suffer at the hands of sadistic thugs ever again.[/QUOTE]

Nice to wake up to, thanks for posting.

sure like it staying out front,so folks can read it for themselves