Originally posted by JuniorJumper01:
I said those who haven’t met Paul shouldn’t be pointing fingers at him.
I’m not sure meeting Paul would change the facts of his case. In fact most people who sit on a parole board or are involved with mediation etc are not personally aquainted with the people that come before them. They deal only with the evidence presented, not personal issues. They do take personal references as to charachter, but their goal is to remain objective not emotional.
I have never met Kenneth Lay either, but from the facts presented about him and his dealings I have formed an opinion, so I am not sure why you feel it is necessary to meet PV before forming and voicing an opinion on what he did and if he should be reinstated. Even if he is a very nice man, gifted with a horse and rider etc, it will not change my opinion of his actions, it will not undue what has been done. Although I think that is what has happened with some of his supporters, they have met him and are very charmed by him, so they have to defend him to justify their own association with him.
I don’t think that should be the case either, every one has their own personal boundary and should be respectfully entitled to it.