[QUOTE=Tiffani B;7748167]
I wasn’t “wondering” about their competence in the least. I was simply making a comment that the shanks are not pulled nearly as far back as what is commonly seen in Dressage, and I said that because people usually think that Saddle Seat bits are harsh due to the longer shank. Of course if a rider pulled with the same amount of pressure as a dressage rider, the bit could be extremely harsh (depending on the mouthpiece and purchase). But since we barely touch the bit, and the shanks cannot even BE pulled back that far due to the shorter curb chain, it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison.
Dressage riders view Saddle Seat through a Dressage lens… it’s only natural to do so, but unfortunately it provides a very distorted view of how we ride and use the bridle. I was really just trying to head off an argument at the pass, since I’ve seen so many Saddle Seat threads devolve.[/QUOTE]
Your comment irked me the first time around, the clarification does not make it better.
The angle on the dressage bit is the way it is because it’s made that way, not because it’s being yanked on. That is the zero setting when you hold the rains.
A SS bit is made different, so it also sits in the mouth different.
I do give you the last couple of decades though, doubles ought not be used in conjunction with leveraged cranked nosebands.
But I see that the SS world has it’s own decrease of horsemanship to deal with.
cheers.