[QUOTE=beeblebrox;3565231]
"pattnic
Or they should wait until they are jumping five-foot to start doing rollbacks at a show? I dunno, I see some value to doing rollbacks, etc at a show before moving up, in order to gain more experience.
You know, some horses just don’t have the ability to do higher than 3’… but their riders/owners love their horses so much that they stick at 3’, even when they could advance."
I am fine with roll backs and I think you know that I am not talking about controlled roll backs. I am talking about the rooting parents and trainers on the rail at the speed bump jumpers (.70 thought .90) going for broke and out of control. WHY because many of those horses have come down the ranks and are still willing does not mean they should be run off their legs. AT the season closer the champion of one such division was SCARY and did not have the skills to be doing what she was doing and be encouraged by her coach, the horse used to do the high AO’s and is now being run like a dog and looks like bambi on ice being dragged around turns by a uneducated rider who was rewarded. IT’S SICK but wahoooo I am circuit champion of the .85’s The cherry on the cake all was several trainers and parents where opened mouthed at that dangerous riding and as the championship was announced the parents and trainers were telling the kid it was sour grapes from people… My point is and also was for the original poster it is easy to put on your rose colored glasses and “ASSUME” that people are in envy of your ride when quite possibly we are thinking WTH, OMG etc!
The original poster talked of a roll back and one stride to a fence, VERY VERY few speed bump jumper riders have that skill to ride what she described.
QUITE a leap you make from 3 foot to 5 foot by the way, I said nothing about waiting until you jumped 5 feet but want to learn how to ride a roll back, do it like many of us did and spend some time in the medals where you need control and guts. I understand the economics of having them and appreciate the speed bump jumper classes as they are a great learning venue for green horses and green riders on made horses but miss the days when jumpers started at 3’3-3’6. Lastly I do not BUY for one second the whole " well the horse can not jump bigger than 3 foot so well" what you let some kid or adult careen around on some poor horse pretending to be Richard Spooner? NOT OK! I did a happy dance when A FEW speed bump jumpers CLASSES went to clear round ribbons and no championship as it reduced the zeal from parents, riders and trainers! SO because trainer and riders could not calm down management had to to, that should tell you something!!! Safety people, it’s not just for breakfast ;-)[/QUOTE]
My POINT is that there is a time and a place for everything, including a tight rollback in a “speed bump” jumper class. YOU are the one who in their first post on this thread, implies that there is no reason for such a thing. I was simply giving examples of the where and why it might be appropriate.
Not all horses have the capacity to be competitive at 3’6"… so their owners compete them at 3’. I’m not saying they are not able to jump higher; rather, they compete at where they are physically comfortable. No one here will disagree with me.
I “made the jump” from 3’ to 5’ because a) someone else had mentioned those heights, and b) I was exaggerating to help make a point.
I’m not saying there are not unsafe riders. I am also not saying that safety should not be a concern. I am simply saying that just because someone is competing at a lower level, that does not necessarily mean that they are an unsafe rider.
Perhaps try to not paint with such a broad brush.
PS - Your first post also said nothing positive about the skill of the rider. You essentially said that they were likely being used as an example of “what not to do”. It was not until this last post that you indicate that the other poster might actually have some skill.