Malarkey.
So, bottom line is it’s all Mary Haskins Gray’s fault. Sort of like the old saying, “the devil made me do it”.
13 Likes
We would ignore you if you weren’t so easy to expose.
5 Likes
So much bitterness and need to destroy other people. Truly shocking.
16 Likes
Ah, there they are, those sour grapes…
24 Likes
We?
21 Likes
So then the same chance as LK and about a zillion other riders including me.
Also have you considered how the inhabitants of Wellington, etc feel about having someone in their midst who illegally installs video on people? It is my understanding that it’s not favorable at all.
But no, MHG has not been charged nor will she be. BECAUSE ILLEGALLY OBTAINED SURVEILLANCE ISN’T ADMISSIBLE.
IMHO installing such equipment is creepy and screams I wouldn’t want any such person near me.
No one deserves to be shot. No one deserves to be stalked or threatened or any of those things. But consider that had LK not come around here stomping on others that maybe she would be viewed more favorably?
16 Likes
Threat?
6 Likes
No…that’s not the bottom line. MB did what he did. MHG did what she did. MB should have put on his big boy pants and not let her ruin his formerly well run business. MB had a girlfriend 20 years younger than he…not that there’s anything wrong with that. But, if that’s what you want you’d better be able to handle it.
2 Likes
“SHE WILL BE EXPOSED…”
Powerful words. Perhaps that is what so many others have been doing in these threads - exposing the nastiness.
7 Likes
I’m not dictating anything. I’m just telling you that I believe most people are here, reading this thread because we’re interested in the context for what lead to the shooting. If someone is here providing that, they don’t have to weigh in on your CotH drama from 6 months ago. You are not entitled to that. Enough already. This is exactly the type of thing that always de-rails these threads into a dumpster fire.
I appreciate you sharing this context @Inigo-montoya. Carry on.
12 Likes
This is very interesting. I wonder why it would even be an open question? After such a grave incident, I genuinely don’t understand why the scene would not have been locked down and properly secured immediately after the actors were taken away to hospital. Do you know why that might be?
As far as clothes, while I sympathise, I don’t think that would be a compelling reason to enter a crime scene unaccompanied. I was once prohibited by law enforcement from entering my dwelling for police matter and clothes were procured from a local big box store. I am lucky to be able to merrily pop off to the shops and get replacement togs as, I believe, RG would also have been. However, even poverty and other compelling reasons like needing medication, did not allow anyone to cross the tape without an LE escort. So, I’m afraid the location of his clothing is completely irrelevant here.
25 Likes
FYI THREE different people asked the same question. Just so you know.
16 Likes
Un-frigging-believable comment. Really. You are a real piece of work, aren’t you?
13 Likes
I for one, think threats made to members is very relevant. I’m surprised another COTH member would dismiss it so offhandedly.
22 Likes
Ma’am this is a Wendy’s.
2 Likes
Yeah I remember when I had MY first beer.
5 Likes
You’re adding nothing useful
27 Likes
You telling me I’m adding nothing useful, for telling @Knights_Mom that’s she’s adding nothing useful, is again adding nothing useful.
5 Likes
Well, I gotta say, this has actually become too much drama for even me to take.
It’s always someone else’s fault for these folks.
17 Likes
Now FOUR people wanted the answer to that question.
Agenda much?
8 Likes
