Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance

I did recieve an email back from Derek Shively from USSA and he confirmed what I said. They have no lobbyist in the Virginia State General Assemby.

-----Original Message-----
From: Derrek Shively [mailto:dshively@ussportsmen.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 12:00 PM
To: xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance

Not at this time, we are monitoring the situation at this point. If you have any information you can forward us that would be great.

You can also contact Evan Heuskinkveld; eheuskinkveld@ussportsmen.org he is our State Services person.

Derrek Shively I Education Director
The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance I Our Sport. Our Heritage. Our Fight.
Ph: (614) 888-4868 ext. 207 I Fax: (614) 888-0326
dshively@ussportsmen.org I www.ussportsmen.org
Join the Fight to Protect Hunting Today!

I enjoyed this, Hope you do as well.

http://www.roanoke.com/photography/coondog/coonhunt.html

Oh - thank you for sharing that!! What lovely hounds!

You know - I was struck by the fact that kids were out. That’s great. It’s so important to get kids involved, and teach them to hunt safely and ethically; don’t you think?

Yes ![]( do. I try and let as many go with me as possible. This is my crew, they look like a ruff bunch but they aren’t.

[IMG]http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a127/Hokieman/hold.jpg)

Boomber acting like a coondog
[IMG]http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a127/Hokieman/hereboy.jpg)

Spotsy weighs in on hunting dogs
January 9, 2008 12:35 am

Back in the trailer after a hunt, Hugo, Gallup, and Tarnish watch the fox hunters standing around. The hounds are rigorously trained for fox hunting.

Some groups in the state have questioned whether the use of hunting dogs is a form of animal cruelty.

BY DAN TELVOCK

Hunters who use dogs have launched a statewide effort to defend this longtime tradition that they believe is under attack.

The Department of Game and Inland Fisheries has partnered with Virginia Tech to study the use of hunting dogs. The state agency created a working group to make recommendations by November that will “provide diverse opportunities for hunting with hounds in Virginia in a manner that is fair, sportsmanlike and consistent with the rights of private property owners and other citizens.”

Modern challenges of rapid growth, smaller parcels for hunting, more frequent turnover of rural land and concerns about animal rights all have created the need to review the standards and laws, according to minutes of July 17 Board of Game and Inland Fisheries meeting in Richmond. The meeting attracted about 350 people, mostly hunters.

Spotsylvania County supervisors Emmitt Marshall and T.C. Waddy won unanimous support of a resolution last night that states current laws are sufficient to regulate hunters and the use of hunting dogs.

A shortage of wardens makes it difficult for the agency to enforce the laws, the resolution states. Five other Virginia counties, including Caroline, have already passed or are considering passing a similar resolution.

“We want to stop this thing before it goes too far,” Marshall said during an interview before the county board meeting.

Marshall is a member of the Berkeley Hunt Club.

“We treat dogs better today than we ever have before,” he said.

The game department commissioned the study and working group to address rising complaints about hunting dogs. Virginia Tech Assistant Professor of Fisheries and Wildlife Steve McMullin leads the study.

He could not be reached for comment, but his Web page states that the use of hunting dogs has generated “substantial opposition” from animal rights advocates and private landowners who are concerned with trespassing problems.

State law states hunters whose dogs stray on private property cannot carry their guns to retrieve the dog, and they must identify themselves when asked. McMullin says on his Web page that the 900 comments received in two months on the VDGIF Web site relating to a resident’s recommendation to make the law more restrictive shows the degree of controversy that surrounds this law and the use of hunting dogs. Two recent meetings in Bowling Green and Charlottesville attracted more than 200 people, mostly hunters.

Since the announcement of the study, the Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance, with support from the Commonwealth Sportsmen’s Alliance political action committee, has been established. The group urges hunters to unite against further restrictions on hunting dogs.

It is distributing fliers that state the VDGIF is trying to outlaw hunting with dogs, which the agency has strongly denied. More than 200 hunting clubs across the state, including at least five in this region, are shown as “alliances” with the group.

Waddy, 72, said after last night’s county board meeting, that hunters have used dogs for years and he supports preserving the right.

“That’s hunting,” he said. “I’ve been hunting since I was 8 years old, and I’ve always used a dog.”

Dan Telvock: 540/374-5438
Email: dtelvock@freelancestar.com

Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance
News Briefs
Powhatan, Virginia
Thursday, January 10, 2008

Caroline and Spotsylvania Counties Pass Pro Hunting Dog Resolutions
These two counties are the fifth and six counties to pass our resolutions in support of your Heritage of Hunting with Dogs! Charlotte, Brunswick, Mecklenburg, and Lunenburg Counties have also passed the “Brunswick Resolution” written and promoted by your Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance, http://www.vahda.org/PDFs/Resolution%20by%20Counties.pdf. If your county hasn’t passed our resolution, call your member of the county Board of Supervisors and ask them to pass our resolution of support. Take them a copy of the “Brunswick Resolution” so that they know others have gone before!

General Assembly begins its 2008 session

Now the fight to protect our heritage and traditions begins in earnest. Most of you have asked to be kept informed and said you want to help, we here we go! We will do our best to keep you up to date, but the days are long and tiring so news will be brief. Delegate R. Lee Ware, Jr., (R-Powhatan) has filed the Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance bill to restructure the DGIF Board of Directors. House Bill 1352, http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?ses=081&typ=bil&val=hb1352 Reconstitutes the membership of the Board of Game and Inland Fisheries. The bill changes the criteria for appointment from the current requirement that there be a member chosen from each congressional district to at least one member, but no more than three, from each Department of Game and Inland Fisheries District. As a qualification for appointment, each Board member must have held a resident hunting or fishing (should have been trapping also but was deleted by Legislative Services at drafting) license for three consecutive years. The most important feature is that members will no longer serve “at the pleasure of the Governor” or appointing authority, but will serve a full four year term as long as they faithfully fulfill their duties. This will minimize but not eliminate political influence!

ACTION:

  1. Call Delegate Ware’s Office (804) 698-1065 and thank him for being the patron of the House Bill 1352! Even if Delegate Ware is not available tell Barbara, his Secretary or David Bouvenizer, his right hand, that you appreciate the support of Del. Ware!
  2. Call your Delegate and State Senator and ask them to sign on the Bill as co-patrons! http://leg1.state.va.us/081/mbr/MBR.HTM will give you their session phone numbers. If you don’t know who your legislators are, just click here http://leg1.state.va.us/081/mbr/MBR.HTM .
  3. Write letters to the editor of your local paper and the Richmond Times Dispatch in support of your Heritage!

Newly Elected Congressman Rob Wittman holds his first event – a Goose Hunt and wants to invite you! First Congressional District Representative Rob Wittman is holding a duck and goose hunt on a series of farms in northern Westmoreland County on January 21st. The cost of the hunt is $500.00 per hunter. The number is very limited as you can imagine. If you are interested, contact Kirby Burch by return email or at (804) 794-8612. It’s great to have a real hunter in Washington! I hope some of you or your friends will be interested in joining Rob!

Watch for legislative Updates!
We will be reviewing legislation as it appears. News brief and the VHDA website will be used to keep you informed, but we need your help! If you live in Central Virginia and can help enter members’ information into the computer, let us know. If you can hold a fund raiser or rally Contact Matt Bolton Phone: (434) 454-6903 Email: amb3@meckcom.net Or email info@vahda.org.

Remember this is your organization! If you don’t want it to be like those “other” hunting organizations that let you down, you must get involved! GET IN THE FIGHT OR LOSE YOUR RIGHTS!

Newly Elected Congressman Rob Wittman holds his first event – a Goose Hunt and wants to invite you!
First Congressional District Representative Rob Wittman is holding a duck and goose hunt on a series of farms in northern Westmoreland County on January 21st. The cost of the hunt is $500.00 per hunter. The number is very limited as you can imagine. If you are interested, contact Kirby Burch by return email or at (804) 794-8612. It’s great to have a real hunter in Washington! I hope some of you or your friends will be interested in joining Rob!

Now the fight to protect our heritage and traditions begins in earnest. Most of you have asked to be kept informed and said you want to help, weLL here we go! We will do our best to keep you up to date. we need every virginia hunter to call their legislator and ask them to oppose bill sb263 !@!! you can find your legislature at http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform DON’T PUT THIS OFF, DO IT TODAY!!!

history | hilite | pdf
083911220

SENATE BILL NO. 263
Offered January 9, 2008
Prefiled January 8, 2008
A BILL to amend and reenact § 18.2-136 of the Code of Virginia, relating to retrieving dogs from the property of others; penalty.

Patron-- Deeds

Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

  1. That § 18.2-136 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:

§ 18.2-136. Right of certain hunters to go on lands of another; carrying firearms or bows and arrows prohibited.

A. Fox hunters and coon hunters, when the chase begins on other lands, may follow their dogs on prohibited lands, and hunters of all other game, when the chase begins on other lands, may go upon prohibited lands to retrieve their dogs, but may shall not carry firearms or bows and arrows on their persons or hunt any game while thereon. The use of vehicles to retrieve dogs on prohibited lands shall be allowed only with the permission of the landowner or his agent. Any person who goes on prohibited lands to retrieve his dogs pursuant to this section and who (i) carries his firearm or bow and arrow on his person or hunts while on the property or (ii) willfully refuses to identify himself when requested by the landowner or his agent to do so, is guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor.

B. Any firearm or bow and arrow carried by the person in a manner that violates clause (i) of subsection A shall, upon conviction of such person violating clause (i), be forfeited to the Commonwealth by order of the court trying the case. The forfeiture shall be enforced as provided in Chapter 22 (§ 19.2-369 et seq.) of Title 19.2. The officer or other person seizing the property shall immediately give notice to the attorney for the Commonwealth.

C. In addition to the penalty prescribed in subsection A, the court shall revoke the current hunting license, if any, of a person convicted of violating clause (i) of subsection A and prohibit the issuance of any hunting license to that person for the next license year. If the person hunts during this prohibited period, he is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor. Notification of such revocation or prohibition shall be forwarded to the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries pursuant to subsections C and D of § 18.2-56.1.

Careless Sportsmen Advocates

[QUOTE=Hokieman;2928623]
Newly Elected Congressman Rob Wittman holds his first event – a Goose Hunt and wants to invite you!
First Congressional District Representative Rob Wittman is holding a duck and goose hunt on a series of farms in northern Westmoreland County on January 21st. The cost of the hunt is $500.00 per hunter. The number is very limited as you can imagine. If you are interested, contact Kirby Burch by return email or at (804) 794-8612. It’s great to have a real hunter in Washington! I hope some of you or your friends will be interested in joining Rob![/QUOTE]

I confess to endorsing Rob Wittman’s 2005 candidacy for the Virginia delegate seat vacated by Albert Pollard, but Wittman totally misled the Virginia Hunting Dog Owners’ Association (VHDOA) by dissembling on his new candidate hunting and animal rights issues questionnaire. But what the devil is Kirby Burch’s excuse? Does he completely ignore what’s happening in the General Assembly, or not understand legislation? Wittman was one of only four GOP Richmond members endorsed for reelection in 2007 by the animal rightist Humane Society of the U.S., the group desperately trying to stop all hunting, breeding and animal use. Tally NO anyone?

Wittman earned that animal rightist endorsement by introducing two terrible bills in 2007. The first required virtually every dog in Virginia be neutered. The second made it easier for someone to kill another’s dog without penalty. Wittman refused to discuss his bills. VHDOA testified against both of them. They were defeated. Most dog owners living in VA’s 99th district know or suspect that Wittman’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer. What’s VHDA’s problem?

[QUOTE=Bob Kane;2931066]
I confess to endorsing Rob Wittman’s 2005 candidacy for the Virginia delegate seat vacated by Albert Pollard, but Wittman totally misled the Virginia Hunting Dog Owners’ Association (VHDOA) by dissembling on his new candidate hunting and animal rights issues questionnaire. But what the devil is Kirby Burch’s excuse? Does he completely ignore what’s happening in the General Assembly, or not understand legislation? Wittman was one of only four GOP Richmond members endorsed for reelection in 2007 by the animal rightist Humane Society of the U.S., the group desperately trying to stop all hunting, breeding and animal use. Tally NO anyone?

Wittman earned that animal rightist endorsement by introducing two terrible bills in 2007. The first required virtually every dog in Virginia be neutered. The second made it easier for someone to kill another’s dog without penalty. Wittman refused to discuss his bills. VHDOA testified against both of them. They were defeated. Most dog owners living in VA’s 99th district know or suspect that Wittman’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer. What’s VHDA’s problem?[/QUOTE]

Thanks for your opinions BOB. Have a good day

JSwan, do you actually live somewhere that you can call the game warden and get a response in a reasonable amount of time?

I have read this thread with great interest, because we have a terrible problem here with hunting dogs running through our and our neighbors properties. Let’s face it - the people turning them loose KNOW DAMN WELL that they are going to, at some point, most likely end up where they don’t belong. The total area I am discussing here, including my land, is less than 100 acres. The bottom line is, they use the law to cover their illegal intentions. The good news is, the law says I can shoot any animal harrassing my livestock. If my horses start running because someone’s dogs are in the creek next to my pasture, on my land, I consider that harrassment and I will begin shooting. In fact, I plan my gun purchase to be made tomorrow.

When driving home tonight, there were people in the woods across the street from my land (posted no hunting) at 11:00 “looking for their dogs”. What the eff.

Tradition my ass… unless they have huge tracts of land to hunt on, it should be ILLEGAL for someone to turn their dogs loose to chase animals out of the brush so they can shoot them on the side of the road.

I grew up hunting on 250 acres in Michigan. I hunted with respect for the land and the animals. This method of hunting, where dogs are turned loose to run willy nilly in hopes that they will flush a deer towards the fat, lazy man sitting on the side of the road in a lawn chair is DISGUSTING and HARDLY SPORTING IN ANY WAY. I have seen 7 and 8 men shooting at a herd of deer being chased towards them by dogs. HOW SPORTING IS THAT? Then when they lose their dogs, they drive around looking for them. No way are they going to get out of that truck and WALK AROUND. They have walkie talkies and ATV’s. During hunting season, every morning we would wake up and see dead deer laying in the fields and pastures around us… the deer they shot and did not track (they don’t GO INTO THE WOODS, YOU KNOW… that would be too sporting, to actually be responsible for finishing off something you wounded) and left to die. Now the farmer has to remove it from his field, how wrong is that!!!

Last winter we watched a poor bitch freeze to death because she was not found before her hunter left her… she would not come to any of us and always disappeared before animal control would get there. Then she started growing a big belly under her bag of bones body. She would always sit where he had dropped her off on the side of the road, so I saw her regularly. One night the temp dropped to wayyy below freezing and the rain started… I never saw her again. I assume she froze to death somewhere. I hope the SOB who left her rots for it.

Because I do not believe that it is human nature - or certainly not the nature of the people doing this here - to police themselves, I hope that all hunting with dogs is made illegal, other than that of a registered fox hunt club. I have never had THEIR dogs all over my farm, or had to go find them in the woods after dark, baying like they have been eviscerated, or had them collapse exhausted on my porch, their un-neutered bodies covered in fleas and ticks. I particularly love it when they are found in the barn and have peed on the hanging horse blankets and hay in the barn aisle. Or are shitting big piles of worms all over the place. Or are growling at my kids and dogs.

FWIW, I have two dogs who stay on my property. I wonder how hunters would like it if I decided to come turn my animals loose on their property on a regular basis? If they had to listen to my dogs bark and carry on (but then, my dogs BARK, they don’t HOWL like they are being gutted with a dull knife) while I made my own barking noises trying to retrieve them? For hours? If my dogs scared their animals and made it unsafe for them to do their JOB and EARN THEIR PAYCHECK on their own land?

There is nothing a game warden can do about this. It is too widespread, too everywhere, and they LIE constantly about where they have been, where their dogs were let out, and really, who effing cares? If they want to hunt then they should buy their own farm and hunt on it. Why should I pay for my land and pay taxes on it for them to use it at will? The days of being able to hunt this way without grossly violating other peoples rights are over.

There is no way to control people like this other than to totally make what they do illegal.

Maybe this post will give some of you a clue as to why people are calling about deer hunters and they are really pissed off. If they have had the experiences I have, they have every reason to be angry. Did I mention the guy who was a “guest” of the local hunting club who didn’t know he was not supposed to fire into the woods on my side of the road and almost shot me while I was riding? I think he was more freaked out than I was. Lucky for me I was on my ten year old horse and not my three year old

Times change. Land use changes. People are not willing to share their land with inconsiderate arrogant lazy people who call themselves sportsmen and are not. FWIW, I would have no issue letting someone still hunt on my property. But this dog thing… just no.

Yup!

Yup! That about sums it up IMHO! EqTrainer has very valid points.

VHDOA sent an email alert that HSUS has just introduced 26 bills in the Va. legislature; very scarey…I sent it to my hunting friends and the MFHA.

The answer is somewhere in between…

EqTrainer - Like a lot of rural dwellers, we have to practice more self reliance than urban dwellers.

Meaning - I can call a game warden but the response time is long. But that’s true of calling the state troopers or deputies, too. Oh - ambulances, firetrucks - any type of emergency response takes a long time.

I think that answers your question. The rest of your post was not a question.

But if you want - I’ll give you some suggestions on how to work with your game warden. You contact law enforcement and discuss your concerns and mention the illegal activity. You request that they step up patrolling and enforcement in your area. You tell them the best time to come out, where to look for illegal activity, and cooperate when they have questions or need anything from you. And you may want to do this before hunting season starts.

I’ve had to do this for people harassing my livestock, racing, and all sorts of other (non-hunting) related problems. It’s practically impossible for a cop to catch them in the act; and it’s very frustrating to have to wait for a cop to show up. But working with the troopers and deputies, the jerks were finally arrested.

I have no doubt that law enforcement in your area would be happy to work with you to help nab illegal or unethical hunters. Legal hunting, even if you don’t care for it - well - I can’t help you there. I’ve hunted with dogs since childhood - and what you describe is not the norm.

[QUOTE=J Swan;2931521]

But if you want - I’ll give you some suggestions on how to work with your game warden. You contact law enforcement and discuss your concerns and mention the illegal activity. You request that they step up patrolling and enforcement in your area. You tell them the best time to come out, where to look for illegal activity, and cooperate when they have questions or need anything from you. And you may want to do this before hunting season starts.

I’ve had to do this for people harassing my livestock, racing, and all sorts of other (non-hunting) related problems. It’s practically impossible for a cop to catch them in the act; and it’s very frustrating to have to wait for a cop to show up. But working with the troopers and deputies, the jerks were finally arrested.

I have no doubt that law enforcement in your area would be happy to work with you to help nab illegal or unethical hunters. Legal hunting, even if you don’t care for it - well - I can’t help you there. I’ve hunted with dogs since childhood - and what you describe is not the norm.[/QUOTE]

This is excellent advice. I had trespass problems as a new land owner in rural Virginia years ago. Pressing law enforcement does help a great deal. Realize that one man may cover hundreds of square miles, but most wardens know the local hunters and can get the word out that they’re unwelcome on your property. Another thing that works well is to give hunting permission to a careful still hunter or two with the understanding that they’ll post your land and keep other hunters off it. These same hunters will frequently help you with fence repair and clearing downed trees.

Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance is working towards a solution to the problem that exsits in a small group of deer hound hunters rather than the majority. I am not here to debate with anyone on this topic as it serves no purpose in resolving the issue at hand. I agree that a problem exisits and were working toward solutions for a resolution. if your interested in learning more join Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance and attend our meetings. This forum or any other isn’t going to resolve the current problems, it is only adding fuel to the fire. I came in peace to inform virginia resident hunting dog owners that they do have a means of exercising their political voice if they choose too by joining with us.

JUST SOME MORE THOUGHTS ON WHAT I AGAIN SEE AS A COMPLEX ISSUE, in no particular order:

[QUOTE=EqTrainer;2931378]
JSwan, do you actually live somewhere that you can call the game warden and get a response in a reasonable amount of time?

I have read this thread with great interest, because we have a terrible problem here with hunting dogs running through our and our neighbors properties. Let’s face it - the people turning them loose KNOW DAMN WELL that they are going to, at some point, most likely end up where they don’t belong. The total area I am discussing here, including my land, is less than 100 acres. The bottom line is, they use the law to cover their illegal intentions. The good news is, the law says I can shoot any animal harrassing my livestock. If my horses start running because someone’s dogs are in the creek next to my pasture, on my land, I consider that harrassment and I will begin shooting. In fact, I plan my gun purchase to be made tomorrow.

When driving home tonight, there were people in the woods across the street from my land (posted no hunting) at 11:00 “looking for their dogs”. What the eff.
[endquote]

What EqTrainer said, far more eloquently than I TRIED to do in an earlier post, describes the problems landowners are having. Whether trying to see the situation from the landowners’ perspective is useful or not, only those opposed can say.

Our next-door neighbor (with 20 acres next to our 36) stopped us on our shared driveway last Sat to comment on all the anti-hunting letters he’s seen in the papers lately (I had not noticed this myself). I mentioned the thought that new landowners or people moving into new subdivisions in formerly rural areas aren’t used to “country ways” – and he cut me off with an emphatic “SO WHAT.” He’s 2nd or 3rd generation on his place, but even so he can sympathize with feeling like your land should be your land, however long you’ve owned it.

I kind of blinked in surprise at his vehemence, then got to thinking about what he said.

As I said in my earlier post, I think it’s a complicated issue, because I do think that people should be able to have a reasonable amount of control over their own property, however long they’ve owned it, but I also love and can only thrive in a rural lifestyle that is fast disappearing.

I find compelling EqTrainer’s contention that, if folks want to hunt, they should buy land to hunt themselves, or perhaps form a hunt club that can collectively buy said land. Large enough tracts that it can reasonably be expected that dogs won’t cross onto posted property.

And I also wish/hope that fewer people with land will decide to sell it to developers!

And, a couple of times it’s been said, work with game wardens/law enforcement about the illegal activity you’re seeing. But, as EqTrainer says, that’s the problem: you are getting harrassed, and it’s perfectly legal. Because absolutely hunters say they are just retrieving (or looking for) their dogs, if they are trespassing. And it’s the dogs themselves that are often the problem when they upset your own animals, who are duly enclosed on their own property. Yes, I know I could legally shoot them, but frankly I just can’t do that. Because I’m too much of a dog lover, and animal lover, and I guess plenty would say I’m some kind of strange bleeding-heart type.

Sadly, I do see a number of truly heartbreaking skin-and-bones hunting dogs each year. Saw one on Thursday, as I was driving home with one of my own dogs who had just had a chemo treatment. Because my dog’s immune system is greatly suppressed from chemo, I didn’t want to stop right then and there to try to coax the stray dog to me. The dog was only about a 1/4 mile or less from my house. I got my dog home and situated, grabbed some dog food, and jumped in the ATV. I was so sorry that even in that short a time, I couldn’t find the dog. I had seen that he had a regular collar, and I took my cell with me so I could call if I could read a nameplate. While I was out, I saw my neighbor’s mother and asked her to keep an eye out for the dog, too, as they already have adopted an abandoned hunting dog (and are just good people) and I knew they’d be sympathetic.

Of course, many, many hunting dogs look perfectly fit. But you truly do see some that are very close to death from starvation. Often they are too wary for you to approach and help them.

As a corollary, it makes me shudder to think what will happen when NAIS spreads to [other] companion animals (because my horses are companion animals to me), and because a hunting dog has run across my property, the gov’t officials will decide my animals have been exposed to something. Hope I’m being way “out there” in thinking that’s a possibility … I know VHDOA lobbied against VA’s ridiculous mandated notification by vets to counties and munipalities of dogs that have received rabies vaccinations. I suppose there’s no immediate reason for taking a position on NAIS, though, unless they see it, as I do, as potentially affecting every animal.

Back to EqTrainer’s post: I too would love to see special considerations given to foxhunters. As I said in my previous post, foxhounds are hunted differently from, say, deer dogs, and it has been my experience that they just don’t cause the same issues, as they are closely followed by staff that keep them on a line and work to take them off a line if the dogs are headed for a busy road, or about to cross into unpermitted land, etc. I know many dog hunters will not want to make any such distinctions, but what I’ve said simply describes my experience.

Alright, I’ve run on far too long. I know many will disagree with things I’ve said. But I think the length of this thread shows that the issue affects a lot of people.

Y’all are arguing about a problem (abuse of the exception to trespass). You’re complaining that people abuse it.

Well, yes, that is the whole point of trying to resolve it. There is a way to stop the abuse of RTR.

I find it very sad that y’all think that foxhunters should be exempted somehow. We’re all hunting, and there is no difference between a mounted foxhunter with a hound that has gotten lost, and a deer hunter who’s dog has gotten lost. Or run riot.

Certainly not to a landowner.

Many hunt clubs do own or lease their own land. However, dogs cannot read, and it still possible that one is going to cross onto posted land. And it is possible for a hunt club to lease 1000 acres to hunt and have one teeny little inholding belonging to someone who posts their land. In that case - does the hunt club not hunt the remaining 999 acres because of that one acre? What y’all are demanding is perfection - no hunting dogs on posted land. I’m hear to tell you - that’s going to be impossible.

The RTR is necessary and there is nothing wrong with that exception to trespass. The ABUSE of it is what is at issue. And yes, there are ways to put more teeth in abuse of it - and the sporting community is FULLY supportive of punishing the bad guys.

I’d like to mention that in many areas - landowners complain about trailriders doing the SAME thing these bad hunters are doing. A lot of folks trailriding just wander willy nilly onto posted land - and if caught - act all innocent or protest they are lost.

Many many landowners are very angered by trailriders. Now - if we were to put the spotlight on that issue - chances are equestrians would get a bit defensive - as equestrian trails are a huge issue in many jurisdictions.

Before lambasting hunters - think about the fact that at least we’ve been aware of the problem and trying to fix it. Think about the fact that the entire sporting community is committed to the welfare of the animals in their care, ethics of hunting, hunter safety and education, and we pay for practically ALL conservation work done on public and private land - through our license fees, conservation groups we donate to - and perhaps you might tone down the rhetoric a little.

What y’all are doing is painting a very very broad brush on an issue, and peppering it with lack of knowledge about how hunting with dogs is done. Foxhunting in the English tradition is a minority. And if you’d like it to continue, you might want to support lawful hunters instead of bitching about the bad apples.

You hit the nail on the head

[QUOTE=J Swan;2935511]
Y’all are arguing about a problem (abuse of the exception to trespass). You’re complaining that people abuse it.

Well, yes, that is the whole point of trying to resolve it. There is a way to stop the abuse of RTR.

I find it very sad that y’all think that foxhunters should be exempted somehow. We’re all hunting, and there is no difference between a mounted foxhunter with a hound that has gotten lost, and a deer hunter who’s dog has gotten lost. Or run riot.

Certainly not to a landowner.

Many hunt clubs do own or lease their own land. However, dogs cannot read, and it still possible that one is going to cross onto posted land. And it is possible for a hunt club to lease 1000 acres to hunt and have one teeny little inholding belonging to someone who posts their land. In that case - does the hunt club not hunt the remaining 999 acres because of that one acre? What y’all are demanding is perfection - no hunting dogs on posted land. I’m hear to tell you - that’s going to be impossible.

The RTR is necessary and there is nothing wrong with that exception to trespass. The ABUSE of it is what is at issue. And yes, there are ways to put more teeth in abuse of it - and the sporting community is FULLY supportive of punishing the bad guys.

I’d like to mention that in many areas - landowners complain about trailriders doing the SAME thing these bad hunters are doing. A lot of folks trailriding just wander willy nilly onto posted land - and if caught - act all innocent or protest they are lost.

Many many landowners are very angered by trailriders. Now - if we were to put the spotlight on that issue - chances are equestrians would get a bit defensive - as equestrian trails are a huge issue in many jurisdictions.

Before lambasting hunters - think about the fact that at least we’ve been aware of the problem and trying to fix it. Think about the fact that the entire sporting community is committed to the welfare of the animals in their care, ethics of hunting, hunter safety and education, and we pay for practically ALL conservation work done on public and private land - through our license fees, conservation groups we donate to - and perhaps you might tone down the rhetoric a little.

What y’all are doing is painting a very very broad brush on an issue, and peppering it with lack of knowledge about how hunting with dogs is done. Foxhunting in the English tradition is a minority. And if you’d like it to continue, you might want to support lawful hunters instead of bitching about the bad apples.[/QUOTE]

Great Post.:yes:

Hmmmm… no, I think there is a big difference between the way a foxhunting club handles their dogs and the way our local dog hunters do. First of all - the foxhunt takes the time to train their dogs to recall. And to train them in general. One of my best friends is a whip with the Red Mountain Hounds and she also supports a ban on dog hunting other than foxhunting. She agrees that it is not the same. Of course, while foxhunting, the hounds are being followed. Deer hunters turn them loose, go a few miles down the road, sit down, crack a beer and hope the dogs will flush a deer towards them. Big difference, IME.

Working with my local hunt club or my local authorities is futile because it’s not their members (for the most part) who are the problem. My dealings with them have always been satisfactory with few exceptions. I feel for them, that the only cure is a ban, but I don’t see any way around it. It’s the local people who seem to have an awful lot of spare time on their hands day in, day out, and do not care what is “in season” and lawful to hunt or not. The way the law is worded, they have the ultimate excuse to cover up any of their unlawful actions. All they have to do when they see a game warden, or the police, is put the gun in the truck. IMO if a law is unenforceable then it should be replaced with one that CAN be enforced. A ban could be enforced easily… if you are on my land, you are trespassing. Period. If you are honest and my neighbor, you would have come to my door to tell me your dog is in my pasture and you need to go get it. If you are dishonest and breaking the law, you won’t, and then I can simply call the police and have the law enforced.

This is not an ocassional problem here. It is day in, day out, almost nonstop. At any given time I can hear a pack of dogs howling and baying and carrying on somewhere. I am beginning to think that some of the packs of dogs I hear have simply banded together and are truly just running loose and wild now. Of course they would; that is what dogs do. I don’t blame the dogs. Keep in mind that I am not experiencing a single dog on a random occassion. I am having PACKS of dogs, 5-10 dogs, sometimes beagles, sometimes larger coon hounds, coming through my land. A single dog would be no issue. A pack of them is a big problem.

Something to consider here is that I have had days where the dog activity was so high I could not safely ride. Now, this is how I make a living. It is simply wrong, IMO, that someone’s fun of running their dogs should interfere with my ability to do my job on my own land that I pay for. And that speaks pretty loudly to anyone who is responsible for making a mortgage payment… if I can’t ride on it, I can’t pay for it.

Let’s face it… all sorts of things in life become outmoded. Hunting with dogs very well may be one of them. It doesn’t seem practical and possible to do it and coexist with people who own land and are using their land. Yes, I am experiencing a gross abuse of the law here, but I don’t think you realize that what I am experiencing is closer to “normal and average” than what you do, responsibly. No doubt if you hunted around here, JSwan, I’d have another idea about things. But unfortunately I have a whole different group of local "talent’ and I don’t see many choices about how to fix the problem… because they are not going to change.

Be very, very careful of your glass house

EqTrainer-

Be very, very careful about advocating banning hound hunting in Virginia. I can’t write a logical, political or legally defensible exemption for mounted foxhunters. Mounted foxhunters already have special treatment allowing them to hunt on Sundays and unusual youth licensing treatment, things that can be rescinded.