Just a little more specific information about the eviction process, from someone in another state than has been discussed.
It depends on the state and the local jurisdiction. In states where the process is longer, perhaps 3, 6 or even 9 months. In states where the process is more straightforward, depending on circumstances, at best 2 weeks but more realistically 1 to 2 months. The basic eviction process tends to follow the same general steps across jurisdictions, but the details and the timeline vary between states.
In some jurisdictions a farm eviction has a longer legal process, designed to give the tenant more time to find another farm home and relocate the animals.
The tenant is likely not paying during this process. Technically this creates a debt they still owe even after the eviction, but other than filing it in court it may not ever be possible to collect any blood from that rock.
There is a big IF on the timeline for any state or jurisdiction, and that is IF that the process is followed correctly and expeditiously by the landlord. There are a many formal steps that have to happen in just a certain way. The landlord has to keep the process moving forward by continuing to take the next step as soon as it is allowed after the last step. If the landlord stops or slows down, so does the process.
If the landlord screws up the process then the timeline will be extended, sometimes by months, depending on the mistake. And the landlord can screw up the eviction process by behavior mistakes, as well as by process mistakes.
I mention this because some of the prolonged eviction horror stories happen when the landlord messes up. Sometimes a landlord thinks they can get a tenant out faster by doing dumb stuff that ends up adding weeks or months to the process. Dumb stuff includes anything from certain confrontations with the tenant to cutting off the tenant’s utilities. Threatening or in any way intimidating the tenant is on the list.
Even in conservative, pro-business states, tenants today have far more rights than they ever have, particularly in eviction situations. Deviating from the process plays into the tenant’s hands.
Some non-paying tenants are experienced in drawing out the process to live in a property while paying less than the agreed rent, or no rent at all. Some tenants are experienced in getting into a property without a contract and without paying rent, and then planting roots and requiring a lengthy, expensive and protracted process to get them out. This is how some tenants live, even though it means they must move every so many months. And there isn’t always a legal record if they manipulate the situation to allow them to eventually move out without the landlord filing on them, which the landlord reluctantly agrees to do to save the legal expense.
And some tenants are very good at baiting a landlord into making mistakes that add months to an eviction process.
These are general informational remarks. I have zero knowledge, or even a guess, of what happened in the case under discussion. Also I’m not an attorney, so none of this is legal advice.
An eviction in process can be a profoundly frustrating, worrying and expensive situation for a landlord. Doesn’t matter, the landlord has to stand down and let the process work. In many ways the landlord has fewer rights in a pending or active eviction situation than at any other time. There are more legal constraints on their actions and behavior than at any other time. The landlord may not be legally allowed to be on the property at all. They absolutely cannot do stuff outside of the eviction process to try to get the tenant to move sooner. They sure as hell can’t go over to the property to have it out with a recalcitrant tenant.
Sometimes a landlord suddenly becomes self-aware that they are at the property where they should not be, confonting a tenant which they should not do, and are in the throes of making a huge mistake which will be very costly to them … and then emotionally carry on making it that much worse. Dunno if that is what happened here, of course.
Ironically, it may now be a very long time before LK & RG can be legally removed from that property. Not counting the Fire Marshall situation, don’t know anything about what is going on with that.