Thankfully I’m not in the position to decide myself, but a close friend’s teenage daughter has a horse that the vet has recommended nerving. Her parents don’t know much about horses so they have asked me for my opinion and I just don’t know much about it.
The rider is 16 years old and bought the horse last year or so for the purpose of lower-level eventing. When she goes to college in a year or two the assumption is that she will no longer have time to ride (I did, and I don’t know why that’s the assumption, but it is) and was always planning to sell the horse then.
The horse is young…I think 7 or 8 at the oldest? He is an OTTB who was raced unsuccessfully then retrained as an eventer. He vetted fine and had clean x-rays when they bought him over a year ago. Since then they’ve had nothing but problems, including lameness that ranges from acute to indistinct. He has now been diagnosed with navicular syndrome in both front feet. They’ve done therapeutic shoeing, injections, daily Previcox, Osphos, etc. and nothing keeps him sound even for flatwork.
The vet has now recommended nerving the horse. He says that way he won’t be in pain and she could enjoy him until she goes to college. I love and trust this vet, but to me it sounds a bit barbaric. Plus I wonder what their chances are of selling a horse that has been nerved. (Although they will have a hard time rehoming a lame horse too.)
What are people’s opinions on nerving a navicular horse? Is it as barbaric as it sounds?