[QUOTE=vxf111;8755579]
Except, she did? When you asked for the first right to buy him back, she offered him to you. So she did honor it. She didn’t initiate the contact, but she did honor the ROFR by offring the horse to you at the selling price before she agreed to sell him to someone else.
SO much confusion abounds about ROFR. Once I offered to COTH to write some articles on commonly confused issues in equine contracts. They never responded. I think a few well written articles on a topic like ROFR in an equine sale contract would be useful to the masses. Everytime the topic comes up on the board, EVERY TIME, I see incorrect statements/advice (verbal contracts are somehow less enforceable than written ones, a ROFR is an unenforceable term, etc.). This thread being no exception.[/QUOTE]
You’re totally right, she did honor it by saying I could buy him (I worded that wrong). Granted, her response was kind of, “Sorry I didn’t contact you, but he’s for sale of $xxxx if you want him back.” I got pissed that I had to find him online rather than have her email or call me, but what could I do?
I kinda meant that she didn’t honor it by the OP’s standards, meaning she didn’t say I could have him for free, which would have been idiotic of her! Sure, it sucked, but my point is, he wasn’t mine anymore. He was hers, and she could sell him however she saw fit.
As for the FROR, I agree. There is a lot of confusion about exactly how it should go down. I, personally, would like an article on it… maybe it could help get buyers and sellers on the same page? IME, a FROR is when the current owner, before or right after listing the horse, contacts the previous owner to tell them the horse is for sale. The former owner, who has the FROR, is under no obligation to buy the horse, and the seller/current owner shouldn’t be expected to lower the price or hold the horse for the former owner.