Barisone assessment

[Seeker1]

She was tramatized and medicated. She was unable to distinguish between fact and delusion. Someone told her that he was in the same hospital.

[Seeker1]

What is your point?

[cutter99]

@Seeker1

You are very inapproprate.

Why am I inappropiate @Seeker1?

Because I tell the truth? Because I expect others to tell the truth?

[eggbutt]

I fully expect MB to never be alone when out and about 24/7 to protect him from any encounter with his two attackers.

[Seeker1]

If i explain you will deny. Whats the point?

[cutter99]

@ekat

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

I think it’s standard for most to involve maintaining a distance of 50-100 yards of distance. @Knights_Mom posted an image of a typical order a few threads ago, and that’s what I recollect.

Honestly… if they live in the same town, and end up coincidentally at the grocery store at the same time… one or both need to back off and just avoid the other. That would be the smart thing to do. But, if people want to engage in drama instead of just being practical and living their lives… they could whip out a cellphone, take video, get confrontational, and call the local police.

Lord knows people involved in ugly divorces or breakups sometimes use the issue of violating orders of protection to continue toxic legal drama. Police are used to this sort of thing (unfortunately) and often unsympathetic when it’s obvious someone is trying to leverage an order to create legal drama.

This is very well said, and you’re right. The police are used to people weaponizing their OOP’s because it happens far too frequently.

Oh, I could NEVER see someone weaponizing an order of protection in this case! NEVER!!!

Yes, that is sarcasm!

[SillyHorse]

@FitzE

LK has been on here and all over SM going on and on about how she was medi-vac’ed from the scene which means something is VERY serious. It’s expensive and it’s reserved for the most urgent/dire cases.

She claimed this over and over again when it was not true. People are pointing to that as one more bit of evidence that she often does not tell the truth. She claimed she didn’t know it wasn’t the truth and people are wondering why no one told her the truth in the 2+ years following the incident.

I, for one, am wondering how she got it in her head that she was medivaced. Did someone tell her that, or did she take perverse pleasure in the added drama that a life flight would give her “almost murder?”

[cutter99]

@Seeker1

If i explain you will deny. Whats the point?

The point is I asked you directly. You want to put your version of events out there, even when they do not match sworn court testimony, and then you wonder why you are questioned.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@cutter99

Especially when one of those parties bought a home after the incident so close to the other party! You would almost have to wonder if that was intentional!

I think it’s a pretty likely that if/when MB is released from AK and eventually allowed to return to his home in Florida… a certain someone is going to be looking for a reason to claim he is violating the order of protection, and she will immediately launch a new legal scuffle.

Type B fuster cluck personalities are very predisposed to perpetuating toxic legal drama. In case that wasn’t readily apparent to the everyone after this trial and the Heard-Depp debacle.

[MorganSercu]

Lauren Kanarek is not Lisbeth Salander. Michael Barisone is not Alexander Zalachenko. Barisone wasn’t going to move from his ward to the ICU and kill her.

[Seeker1]

As you know from the trial and mb txts to mary haskins he was threatening to scare her and run her off behind her back. He could have had a rational conversation followed by an eviction notice. He chose not to do that…

[eggbutt]

I doubt there is any explanation to give other than “just because”.

[Seeker1]

There was conflicting testimony. My point to you is that you are inappropriate most of the time. I dont really care what you think personally.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

OMG.

[Seeker1]

Well she was traumatized and she was terrified.

[ekat]

@Seeker1

Well she was traumatized and she was terrified.

I’m confused. I thought she was in a coma?

[Seeker1]

For the first part of her stay…then they brought her out though heavily medicated.

[cutter99]

@Seeker1

There was conflicting testimony. My point to you is that you are inappropriate most of the time. I dont really care what you think personally.

That is your prerogative. But when trying to peddle your line here, expect us to be VERY opinionated.

We are horse women. We deal with 1,000 lb. plus animals easily and are used to manure and how to dispose of it!

[Seeker1]

Woooooo…

[McGurk]

One final question and then I will disengage again.

@Seeker1,

You seem very concerned with letting us all know the severity of Lauren’s injuries, that you were in fear for her life, that she was medically fragile for a period of time. I get it, that’s a terrible thing to watch a your child go through.

Why is it, do you think, that despite that, Lauren is not viewed as a victim? Why do you think people who had never met any of the participants or knew nothing about them before the trial now view Michael as the victim and Lauren and Rob as the villains? Including all the viewers on Law & Crime who aren’t members or readers here; whose only knowledge of the situation came from the trial? Surely, having been shot and sustained life threatening injuries, she’d be viewed sympathetically?

Why isn’t she? Do you know? Can you guess?

Or is that something you just would prefer not to think about?

Also, why is it you’re spending your time here defending your daughter when she’s getting much, much rougher (and unmoderated) treatment in the YouTube comments?

ETA: Edited for clarity and grammar