Re bolded. I don’t understand this statement at all. Suppose the cameras were turned on and had the correct angle to capture the shooting.
Let’s say everything happened the way the prosecutor contended that it did. (Did LK say that it happened in a way significantly different?)
But let’s say the video shows MB pulling out the gun while talking to LK, shoots her twice in the chest, then takes a third shot in RGs direction. If the video shows a shot sort of in RGs direction, but it could be interpreted as a wild, uncontrolled shot, the jury might still go with straight NG on RG. But if it happened exactly as LK said with two shots by MB into her torso and no “scuffle” between RG and MB prior to LK being shot, then it’s clear the prosecution has established its case with respect to LK on all elements aside for state of mind.
Even if the physical events on the shooting wrt LK were crystal clear via a video, the jury would then move on to considering whether MB was legally insane, or not, when he fired the shots. The testimony of the psychiatric experts is the same, and the defense prevails so he is found NGRI on one count of attempted murder (plus gun charge). Even if the jury found that the video established that he did directly shoot at RG’s head, in that case the verdict is 4 counts of NGRI.
MB would not “be in jail for life right now”, he would be in the exact same psychiatric facility right now, with the exact same prospects for release.
How would a video showing exactly what LK/the prosecutor contended about the physical event make any difference at all to where MB currently is, or will be in the future?
Okay, I’ll address the elephant in the room and ask the question, when will Lauren Kanarek, Rob Godwin, and potentially others, be held accountable for their actions for many, many years?
Will any of them face criminal charges or has the justice system in the Livingston area decided to wash their hands of all the wrong doing and be done with them hoping they never return? Will the civil trials be used to hold them accountable? But RG isn’t named in the civil complaints is he? So he just goes his merry way with zero responsibility? Would any USEF/SS decision take all their terrorism and bullying into account? Seriously, who will hold the Kanarek gang accountable for all they have done to others?
FWIW, Florida is a ‘stand your ground’ state…
one day her aim will be off taking pot shots at her ‘paramour’ or he will turn on her the way she has turned on everybody in her circle.
It won’t end pretty, I bet.
Will they see the inside of a courtroom as defendants? /shrug.
I don’t see how the other side of the family, the daughters whio turned out ‘alright’ will endure…they luckily took the names of their spouses. The world is a lot smaller than we think. I can’t see that this episode will be passing the clan by unscathed.
I don’t recall any mention about where MHG lives, just the general neighbourhood she’s riding in. Why on earth would you think MHG would be in any danger from him? She celebrated the jury decision on facebook, so I don’t think she holds any hatred for MB, or fear. LK was the one that did what she could to drive him insane, and testified to it in court.
I think a video could absolutely go toward illuminating the defendant’s state of mind, even without sound. This, of course, depends a lot on angles, but body language and the reaction of others could reinforce or contradict the defendant’s claims of insanity. So IMHO, yes, it could have made a big difference in the outcome of the case.
Well, If MB is competing I would expect he would be in the CDI/FEI classes. I can’t imagine LK is at that level yet IF she is showing at all. Obviously we are putting the cart before the horse. MB still must be cleared by SS/USEF.
I don’t know the exact location of their respective properties, but there are two Publix stores in Loxahatchee that are just a couple of miles apart. Maybe they could come to an agreement that each person would only go to one of the two Publix stores.
Really? A video showing him calmly approaching a petite woman, chatting briefly with her and then pulling out a gun and shooting her twice in the chest would somehow establish that the man doing that was sane and rational? And override the conclusions of the experts who evaluated him clinically?
That literally never occurred to me. I think if I saw an actual video of it, it would underscore the utter insanity of such a thing.
I think it would be useful wrt to whether he did or didn’t aim for RGs head, but even there, the implications of 4 counts of NGRI is the same as for 2 counts of NGRI.
LOL, agree?
If I were a certain trainer I’d pay somebody - anybody - to pick up my groceries and fill up my truck.
I would expect the certain ‘agreement’ to be used by a certain other party to be abused and used for mischief.
Again, why do you mention MHG? Why would you think she’s in danger? Again, she celebrated the jury’s decision on Facebook? If she was fearing for her life, do you think she would do that? Honestly…