Barisone assessment

[McGurk]

Grammar police! Pull over!

“Criterion” is singular, “criteria” is plural.

Lauren in her post screen shotted above references “criterion and nuances.” This is incorrect. Both need to be plural, that is: “criteria and nuances” or both need to be singular: "criterion and nuance. If you in fact are explaining a single criterion and multiple nuances, those descriptors should be in separate clauses.

@CurrentlyHorseless

Any poster who fits these criterion I would find credible.

If you have a single criterion by which you judge credibility, this sentence should read “…who fits this criterion…” if you have multiple criteria, the sentence should read “who fits these criteria.”

How interesting that both LK and CH misuse the word in exactly the same way.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

s there disagreement as to the fact that MHG wanted LK off the property? At least since April? To me what matters is that there was pressure from MHG on MB to get LK out of there, and I don’t think it matters as to the exact reason or reasons. Maybe it was personal dislike. Maybe she resented MBs attention directed to LK. Maybe she just wanted the farmhouse vacated.

I dunno, maybe she didn’t want her kids around lying, drug-addict grifters.

Exactly. It’s obvious that MHG probably had numerous reasons for her intense animosity for LK and understandable that she wanted LK gone.

The only headscratcher is why MB had not asked LK to leave as of Aug3, per MHGs own testimony.

The exact reasons that MHG wanted her gone is not important, and there were probably multiple reasons.

Asked and answered.

Oh, OK. My bad for not understanding that you were taking over the “important task” of QFPing my every post.

Sorry to be slow on the uptake.

That’s not at all what I was doing. My post was about you refusing to accept an answer given to you dozens of times. Your harping on something that matters not at all is serving no purpose. You seem to think it’s relevant when it means nothing whatsoever.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’ve answered this before. He has admitted to being an insider.

An insider that wouldn’t actually claim an identity that could be independent verified as connected to the case, unlike LK and Seeker.

How convenient for this “insider”.

Yes, I’ve been called an insider too many times to count but she doesn’t believe me and I’ve been proven correct repeatedly! Woe is me “I don’t get no respect” - JJ

Being an insider, on its own, doesn’t establish credibility to me.

Surely everyone gets to decide for themselves who they chose to view as credible.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’ve answered this before. He has admitted to being an insider.

An insider that wouldn’t actually claim an identity that could be independent verified as connected to the case, unlike LK and Seeker.

How convenient for this “insider”.

Yes, I’ve been called an insider too many times to count but she doesn’t believe me and I’ve been proven correct repeatedly! Woe is me “I don’t get no respect” - JJ

Being an insider, on its own, doesn’t establish credibility to me.

Surely everyone gets to decide for themselves who they chose to view as credible.

IM was wrong a bunch of times so I tend to be selective as to what I repeat of his.

[MHM]

@Knights_Mom

IM was wrong a bunch of times so I tend to be selective as to what I repeat of his.

Even though he claimed he knew EVERYTHING!!!1!1!

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Volunteering one’s IRL identity, as LK and Seeker did, is not a requirement for posting here. The basis for my finding IM credible is not based on his identity.

@CurrentlyHorseless

Oh, OK. My bad for not understanding that you were taking over the “important task” of QFPing my every post.

Sorry to be slow on the uptake.

@Warmblood1

The same could be said for many posters here. Yet you cling to IM’s every word. Just IM’s. And without knowing their identity or credibility?

Strange.

And they ignore the proof that has been posted where IM has not been correct, or has changed their post or…

@CurrentlyHorseless

Being an insider, on its own, doesn’t establish credibility to me.

Surely everyone gets to decide for themselves who they chose to view as credible.

@Knights_Mom

IM was wrong a bunch of times so I tend to be selective as to what I repeat of his.

@MHM

Even though he claimed he knew EVERYTHING!!!1!1!

[trubandloki]

@McGurk

Grammar police! Pull over!

“Criterion” is singular, “criteria” is plural.

Lauren in her post screen shotted above references “criterion and nuances.” This is incorrect. Both need to be plural, that is: “criteria and nuances” or both need to be singular: "criterion and nuance. If you in fact are explaining a single criterion and multiple nuances, those descriptors should be in separate clauses.

@CurrentlyHorseless

Any poster who fits these criterion I would find credible.

If you have a single criterion by which you judge credibility, this sentence should read “…who fits this criterion…” if you have multiple criteria, the sentence should read “who fits these criteria.”

How interesting that both LK and CH misuse the word in exactly the same way.

I have never liked the grammar police as much as I do now.

[eggbutt]

Good eye!! Imagine if you had made such a grammatical error!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ekat

I’m going to put this out here, again, to provide some clarity.

Remember, Mr T and JK thought they had an agreement for LK to move on Friday, Aug 2nd.

I linked MHG’s testimony earlier in the thread.

2:56:44

Mr S: …text message from you to Michael Barisone on August 3rd 2019?

MHG: yes

Mr S: and did you ask him, “why can we not say to Lauren and Rob and the father because still no one actually has we are evicting you, you must leave no one has said it.”

MHG: that’s correct

Mr S: and is his response to you on line 9365 “Monday morning”

Now, we can keep saying that no one had ever told her to leave by Aug 3rd, when that text was written, OR, we can assume MHG meant exactly what she said - specific to the term “evicting you”.

MB’s response is so relevant, as Mr T did send the notice by email on Monday, Aug 5th.

Re bolded. I read this as MHG texting to MB asking why they can’t just tell LK to leave (start the eviction process by issuing a demand to vacate) and acknowledging that no one has said the “must leave”. She’s pointing out to MB that no one has asked them to leave as of Aug 3!

What did the notice sent by Tarshis by email
say? We are demanding that you vacate by Sept 5?

Or we request you vacate by Aug 7?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’ve answered this before. He has admitted to being an insider.

An insider that wouldn’t actually claim an identity that could be independent verified as connected to the case, unlike LK and Seeker.

How convenient for this “insider”.

Yes, I’ve been called an insider too many times to count but she doesn’t believe me and I’ve been proven correct repeatedly! Woe is me “I don’t get no respect” - JJ

Being an insider, on its own, doesn’t establish credibility to me.

Surely everyone gets to decide for themselves who they chose to view as credible.

IM was wrong a bunch of times so I tend to be selective as to what I repeat of his.

If you don’t find him credible, that’s your call.

[eggbutt]

Side comment -
I’m amazed at the about of text messages between people who are literally near each other. Was Hawthorne Hill so big people had to rely on text messages to communicate?

[DownYonder]

@eggbutt

Well that was a quick walk off with all that weight lifted, only to bounce right back in.

Yes, was it the shortest flounce in history?

[Sdel]

If the only evidence LK is going to have for the civil trial is semantics games about whether she needs a filed eviction before she understands she’s been asked to leave then I would suggest that her case is hopelessly sunk before it ever began.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Re bolded. I read this as MHG texting to MB asking why they can’t just tell LK to leave (start the eviction process by issuing a demand to vacate) and acknowledging that no one has said the “must leave”. She’s pointing out to MB that no one has asked them to leave as of Aug 3!

What did the notice sent by Tarshis by email
say? We are demanding that you vacate by Sept 5?

Or we request you vacate by Aug 7?

@CurrentlyHorseless

If you don’t find him credible, that’s your call.

@eggbutt

Side comment -
I’m amazed at the about of text messages between people who are literally near each other. Was Hawthorne Hill so big people had to rely on text messages to communicate?

I think text messages are a way to communicate when you have a thought about something but do not want to take the time to find that person, or to interrupt that person while they doing something else. You send the thought as a text message.

[Warmblood1]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I read this as MHG texting to MB asking why they can’t just tell LK to leave (start the eviction process by issuing a demand to vacate) and acknowledging that no one has said the “must leave”. She’s pointing out to MB that no one has asked them to leave as of Aug 3!

What did the notice sent by Tarshis by email
say? We are demanding that you vacate by Sept 5?

Or we request you vacate by Aug 7?

The poor horse is dead. Let it go.

[Warmblood1]

@DownYonder

Yes, was it the shortest flounce in history?

My gut told me it was part 1 of a 10 part flounce.

[trubandloki]

@Warmblood1

The poor horse is dead. Let it go.

When you have nothing, you go with that nothing…over and over and over again.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@ekat

I’m going to put this out here, again, to provide some clarity.

Remember, Mr T and JK thought they had an agreement for LK to move on Friday, Aug 2nd.

I linked MHG’s testimony earlier in the thread.

2:56:44

Mr S: …text message from you to Michael Barisone on August 3rd 2019?

MHG: yes

Mr S: and did you ask him, “why can we not say to Lauren and Rob and the father because still no one actually has we are evicting you, you must leave no one has said it.”

MHG: that’s correct

Mr S: and is his response to you on line 9365 “Monday morning”

Now, we can keep saying that no one had ever told her to leave by Aug 3rd, when that text was written, OR, we can assume MHG meant exactly what she said - specific to the term “evicting you”.

MB’s response is so relevant, as Mr T did send the notice by email on Monday, Aug 5th.

Re bolded. I read this as MHG texting to MB asking why they can’t just tell LK to leave (start the eviction process by issuing a demand to vacate) and acknowledging that no one has said the “must leave”. She’s pointing out to MB that no one has asked them to leave as of Aug 3!

What did the notice sent by Tarshis by email
say? We are demanding that you vacate by Sept 5?

Or we request you vacate by Aug 7?

You are mistaken as JK was well into negotiations and a place had already been tentatively lined up before LK put the Kakashi on that.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@McGurk

Grammar police! Pull over!

“Criterion” is singular, “criteria” is plural.

Lauren in her post screen shotted above references “criterion and nuances.” This is incorrect. Both need to be plural, that is: “criteria and nuances” or both need to be singular: "criterion and nuance. If you in fact are explaining a single criterion and multiple nuances, those descriptors should be in separate clauses.

@CurrentlyHorseless

Any poster who fits these criterion I would find credible.

If you have a single criterion by which you judge credibility, this sentence should read “…who fits this criterion…” if you have multiple criteria, the sentence should read “who fits these criteria.”

How interesting that both LK and CH misuse the word in exactly the same way.

I know the correct term is criteria for plural, and often (gasp), edit my posts when I see grammatical errors. But no point in editing now! Mea culpa.

[Warmblood1]

@Sdel

If the only evidence LK is going to have for the civil trial is semantics games about whether she needs a filed eviction before she understands she’s been asked to leave then I would suggest that her case is hopelessly sunk before it ever began.

Totally agree.

I imagine LK would also desperately cling to the same semantics CH clings to. The same level of disillusion is palpable.