LK and IM made a huge deal about this poster and their testimony come court time on this forum. LK made her claims within the first month or two, I believe, after the shooting. It was certainly not a surprise to this poster that they might have been called as a witness while they were posting their claims. That makes the sudden freak out confusing.
Exactly. MB no doubt knew he would be contacted by LK’s prospective new BO or trainer to inquire about her before they took her on. And even if MB only said something like “It wasn’t a good fit,” he would have to live with the knowledge that he had foisted off a troublesome client on another professional. I can easily imagine how conflicted he may have been - "Do I allow her to stay here despite all her shenanigans, or do I GET HER OUT and let some other professional deal with her? And what will that professional think of me when they realize what they are really up against?
It was almost a No Win situation for MB, so I can easily understand any hesitancy on his part to FORCE her to leave, whereas if she had left of her own volition, there would have been less stigma attached to not only him and his business, but also to her (as in, she left because she wanted to leave, not because she was thrown out).
There were some nasty posts about her and her horses after she posted that. I don’t think she was comfortable. It is worrisome with the pushback against SafeSport, big money sponsors, and the hostility to anyone with a different viewpoint to The Only Story Allowed.
Horse safety, being silently blackballed at shows, being scheduled for the last class or the first class or the hottest time of the day.
the poster though did relay her experience with MB the 4 or 5 years ago it happened.
On the other hand, during the course of a professional life you cross paths with people you can’t work with, whatever the reason.
And that was literally the only one to come up on the radar, back then and now.
So I think her issue was genuine, but not necessarily representative.
Does that make sense?
And while it took COTH all but 5 minutes to confirm her identity, I cannot see where something 4 years prior would be admissible.
At least on L&O those margins are very slim to bring in prior bad acts.
NJ seems to be a different animal.
Where it would make a difference, hypothetically, in this case, is that NGRI defense. MB had the burden of proof to show insanity. If, (and I have no idea anything regarding this poster, so this is purely hypothetical) someone existed in the real world that could testify that MB was showing the same patterns of behaviors long before Aug 2019, the prosecution could make an argument that they should testify as a rebuttal (to the insanity defense only) witness. Whether or not Judge T would have allowed it, who knows.
They were some that looked up her show record and claimed her horse wasn’t advanced enough to be chosen by MB to be used in Rio and questioned why someone who claimed to be so afraid/unhappy would have chosen to go back to MB a second time.
I take this to mean that you don’t find:
a) defense expert testimony that he was delusional OR
b) prosecution expert testimony that he was not delusional because the threat was real
to be true. I take this to mean that you believe he was not delusional or insane at the time. Because a “baffling” 911 call from someone delusional who thinks that someone is out to get them makes sense. You can’t be delusional enough to think you are being threatened and in danger and then make a 911 call to harass.
Except it wasn’t. She posted on SM about it.
It’s inconceivable because he DID ask for them to leave. That is why there were negotiations. Negotiations that the Kanareks’ own lawyer testified to in a court of law. Negotiations to leave are an “ask”.
Again - you are now saying that not one, but two lawyers perjured themselves and neither the prosecutor, nor the judge caught it? And that the Kanareks didn’t immediately notify said prosecutor about said perjury when they were sitting in the courtroom? Wow.
No.
But it doesn’t sound like that’s what you think at all… “reciprocal bullying”, “harassment” and all…
If you believe, as you stated, that the police work was acceptable, then it isn’t an “attack” to say that your standards are low when the crime scene processing was so lacking.
Ah I see the “nasty” business of fact-finding and claim verification. Got it. I forgot that we are supposed to just take everything at face value and believe any claim brought to us no matter how improbable.
OMG, I just can’t. Whether or not JK was involved in at least a week (if not WEEKS worth) of negotiations is necessarily material to the issue. You yourself keep insisting there was no “ask” to leave. The negotiations constitute an ask!!!
Head exploding. Is this heat stroke (rode 3 today in this heat wave), or is this really happening? Who am I? What is my name? What year is it? Who is President?