I assume she would be asked to present 5 years of 1099’s, W-2’s, tax returns, whatever would prove she lost income. Certainly Barisone could produce his business records and total loss of income since August 2019 and potential future losses if he can’t build his business back up.
10 Likes
My complaint is that you were saying that **other **posters were writing some “nasty posts” (your words - not mine) about seahorse. I found the thread - Updated barisone lawsuit 10/29/21 post 851 post 2860. People THANKED her for offering her perspective, and asked a few polite questions which she answered. One poster did indeed look up her USDF record, and another poster corrected that initial poster by adding some correct info found via google. Not a single one of those posts were “Nasty.”
25 Likes
Thanks for sharing this. I like dealing with actual numbers.
$3500 x 4 = $14,000 (not inclusive of farrier, private lessons, living accommodations for people, etc)
Another question… in the summer of 2019 in Long Valley, NJ, if 3-4 stalls opened up at a facility like MBs, how long would it typically take to fill them?
4 Likes
How could u know my type when you have never even met me?
1 Like
Yeah, that part is pretty formulaic. You have to prove income at the moment of loss, and then they look back for a period of time based on industry, etc. Then if you’re claiming continued loss of future earnings for some period, based on medical records, they project out based on your past. So that number is usually never just random.
5 Likes
Apparently “nasty” is in the eye of the beholder unless they themselves are being nasty 
Heck, even posts offering a positive light are considered nasty to this group!!
9 Likes
They?
1 Like
Oh, of course. You actively look for negative. That’s on you.
4 Likes
She and michael
1 Like
Please just stop pushing your narrative that your daughter was a good business proposition. It is tired.
15 Likes
So dad, writer of the checks, wasn’t involved in negotiating any of it?
7 Likes
Still trying to be respectful here.
You questioned me, “Are you saying that [two lawyers perjured themselves and the judge and prosecutor stood by]?
I said nothing if the kind. Did not mention the word “perjury”. It was in the form of a clarifying question, but the nature of the question suggested I had accused someone of perjury.
As I understand it, to be perjury, an untrue statement given under oath must also be determined to be material to the issue at hand. I don’t know whether JK participated in the negotiations or not. I can’t really see how it’s material to whether MB shot LK or to MBs state of mind.
I appreciate your fully quoting the passage you were reacting to, so that I could clarify easily.
I imagine, as with much of that we’ve discussed, “solicited” is subjective.
5 Likes
I am as guilty as anyone of responding to certain someones. But what happens if we all stop? Let’s just all click on ignore and see what happens… maybe they will all move on? I am getting tired of seeing certain posters behave like bots and I am disappointed in myself for replying. Challenge to self and others!
11 Likes
I’m wondering if people reach out to Law and Crime expressing interest in seeing the civil trial, if it would encourage L&C to reach out to judge to record it?
10 Likes
Do you imagine you’re fooling anyone, even your legions of friends, when you claim that your purpose was to refute any suggest of illicit employment of the human trafficking kind?
Your protestation of innocence just doesn’t fly.
1 Like
I honestly find that hard to believe. Why would a trainer at that level “solicit” a mediocre ammy? How many horses did your daughter have at the time? She, obviously, approached him. No trainer at MB’s level “solicits” clients. At his caliber, people “flock” to him. I know many people that sought his instruction at that time. He did not seek clients.
24 Likes
You are VERY committed to defending LK from any perceived slights.
18 Likes
The issue is whether Barisone agreed to the deal, not whether it appears like a good deal or a bad deal from his point of view.
If he thought she was not paying enough, he could have said, “as of next month the fee is $3,500 for every horse in training $2,000 for horses not in training plus $1,000 for the apartment.
That’s $12,000 a month in fees or she’s out the door.
If he could have filled the stalls with other boarders for more money, why did he agree to the deal he did?
2 Likes
Ditto.
But let’s say he did “solicit” her in Florida… why would he have “solicited” her, and then they reached an agreement where $5000 per month paid for 2 horses (to start with) in full board, private lessons, living accommodations for two adults and a dog, etc…
This makes no sense.
The going market rate for board alone for one horse in that area, at a facility like MBs, as of summer 2019? It’s apparently $3500 per month.
Why would MB accept less than that from LK if he truly was cash poor?
14 Likes
