well most likely not for the Exemption but most likely could be considered his homestead thus protected from court seizure
Reason why it would not qualify for Exception is he had to be living there Jan 1st, which he has not
Here is the Florida Homestead Exemption requirements
No, she rented a home in NC.
Records indicate that she never owned any property in her name until her father purchased the home in FL and put her name on the deed. Her father’s name is postal listed at some of the known addresses she has used in the past, which lines up with the testimony that he pays her expenses with “money he gets from the bank”.
.
Copied just so I can see this pic again.
They paid cash (JK) for the FL home. Unless they have a 2nd mortgage for the extensive renovations LK posted about, the home has no mortgage. Records indicate they paid $500,000 last December.
I totally love the one that was made for the other thread. The artwork version. It is so perfect.
.
Right now, they are in the written discovery phase. That includes all the documents that are known to exist already, and stuff like the audios that we saw a court filing about last week.
It also includes any interrogatories that they are going to try to address with the parties.
The court has given them until July 30 to complete that. I personally wonder about that though because cLK’s side is likely going to want interrogatories from MB, and MB’s side has a client who is still a patient in AK, hasn’t even had his first Krol hearing yet, and it just may not be in his best interest to start filling out sworn statements yet. I could be way off though. I guess it would depend on what questions are asked.
August 1st is when depositions can begin. The court has set a year deadline on that, but they’ve also set a status conference hearing for mid-October to see where everyone is at.
So, I’m watching that July 30 date, and that October date for progress, for now.
@ekat, this is probably a stupid question but what is the difference between interrogatories and depositions?
One would have to have intimate knowledge of MB’s life to answer that question, as it would require first-hand looks at his driver’s license and other things. He has to meet the residence requirements, which include registered voter, time in state, taxes paid, etc. and he may not have met all of those. His property doesn’t have the Homestead Exemption or any other tax exemptions that require “permanent residence”, though he would most definitely be a full resident once he moves back to FL and get whatever benefits that come with that.
Basically, interrogatories are written, and are answered under oath, and under penalty of perjury. But you have the luxury of answering at your pace within the standard Rules of Procedure.
Depositions are live. You take all the docs you have already, including the interrogatories and get to question the party, again, under oath. There’s no judge present, but your attorney can object for the record. And usually, if a huge dispute over something happens, there’s a judge available or the deposition ends. It is recorded and transcribed. And used to impeach said party at trial.
Thank you for explaining that so well. That makes it much more clear.
Okay, I can’t bite my tongue. I don’t see the likeness between this image and what I saw on the witness stand at the criminal trial. Mental unwellness and lifestyle killed that youthful look a long time ago imho.
I read this fast as “What’s the difference between interrogatories and depositories?”
LMAO I kill me.
You are missing your straight vacuum lines, aren’t you?
In my state, she could only get 50% of the homestead. The homestead exemptions get split up by the unrelated owners who don’t live there.
You’re welcome.
For people who watched it, the Amber Heard/Johnny Depp trial showed really good examples of using a deposition against a party. There were a few clips played from Amber’s deposition that did not match her court testimony at all. The one juror that has anonymously spoken talked about Amber’s lack of credibility and that deposition may have been one of the building blocks for him.
I have now retired from vacuuming! I can vacuum in circles now LOL
There was a throw away line in the dismissal that seems to me to say that essentially his rights can’t be violated until the testified under oath in a trial. I bet the fact that they testified that they took him to trial for this crime without any physical forensic evidence might be problematic.
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
