It would not work such in my state, and may not legally work in FL. Who knows. In my state if you are on the deed, but do not primarily reside there, you don’t qualify and they won’t give you your percentage ownership in exemption.
If you meet the legal requirements for residency in FL and own physical property - as a registered and titled owner - that is claimed as your permanent residence, you can obtain up to $50000 in property tax exemptions, via two $25000 exemptions. LK has met those residency requirements as a listed owner and obtained both of the property tax exemptions.
In Florida there is a lower tax rate under the Homestead exemption for an owner occupant. My cousins mom had a place that was homesteaded because she lived there. Her taxes were $5000. But when mom died and the out of state son took possession of the property the taxes shot up the next year to $6900 because he did not live there.
I can think of no logical and sensible, immediate reason for JK to sign off on a mortgage of the property. LK would certainly want the fast cash from a mortgage to spend on her “lifestyle”, but he would have to sign off on it and he has no reason to do so, especially given that the full-time residents there are two known drug addicted individuals. Demolishing the property and using the mortgage to build a superior, more luxurious and modern dwelling for later resale would be the only possibility I can think of, though I can’t see that happening.
Any parent buying a house straight out for a child, especially if it’s a problem adult child, is going to put their own name on the title so child can’t sell or take out a homeowner loan and make bad choices.
A parent with a responsible adult child might simply gift a down payment and let them make their own choices. Intergenerational wealth transfers are the only way most young adults here manage to buy an apartment (international flight capital and the international kleptocracy is another significant factor). I suspect many canny parents keep their names on the title, either to safeguard an investment or cosign a mortgage.
It was posted upthread that they paid cash for the house. And if JK had to dip into family funds to buy it, it makes sense that he would want to maintain an interest in it so he has a chance of recouping some of that money at some point. His co-ownership also prevents LK from selling the house without his consent. I can so easily see how she and RG might become tempted at some point to cash in by selling the house when they need funds for…whatever.
As for MB’s residency status in FL - IIRC, he was described as being a resident of Florida either at the beginning of the criminal trial, or in media coverage of the trial.
Oops, sorry for these late responses - I am trying to get caught up.
well there are annual dollar limits of Gifts to family members before the gift becomes a taxable event… so from reading the posts saying her father was focused on tax savings it is reasonable to be listed on the deed