Hey. Remember how I was just saying yesterday that MB was doing LK a favor back in July of 2019 by not formally evicting her or firing her as a client, and just strongly encouraging her in a chilly way to self select and leave, because most of the professionals in the sport above a certain level know one another, and strive to maintain cordial professional relationships involving a certain amount of mutual respect, etc?
Yeah.
I don’t know how she managed to get into her current barn… but now that the criminal trial is over, and certain key people testified on behalf of MB…
I do know she will have a VERY hard time finding a place to go should she need to move her horses.
Are you actually oblivious to the fact that Eggbutt changed the edited words to bold type, and said at the bottom of the post, “There, I fixed it for you”? Following an extremely longstanding tradition of very obviously editing a post to make it more accurate than what the original poster said?
Is this your first week on the BB? It certainly doesn’t seem like it, but that is pretty standard procedure, and has been for a very long time.
Unless, of course, you know full well how it works, and just have to be argumentative about it for your own reasons.
How does written discovery differ from witness deposition (other than the presence of the witness)? If either side learns something during the deposition phase, can they go back and request more discovery?
Who is this posted about? Has anyone been diagnosed by a licensed psychiatrist or psychologist? Well one in a delusion and depressive state. Anyone else? In court?
Interrogatories is a written lists of questions that must be answered in written form.
Depositions are a little closer to trial style and they are free form questions and answers and the attorneys can present evidence and demonstratives to supplement their questions.
Typically in the beginning you do file dumps of everything you’ve already got (including audios). Then everyone goes through it to see what more they want. At that point, if you find something that hints at, say a bank record (NOT Fact specific, Just a general example), then you would request it.
Then you send out your interrogatories (written questions, based on what you’ve got so far, sworn under oath and penalty of perjury). Everything you now have is what sets up your deposition questions.
If something comes out that makes you want more, you can ask. Eventually though, the court may say they’ve had enough of a fishing expedition.
Howling at the moon, eh? Excellent description of last night’s posts. Hopefully they are more coherent today and back on the trial. I’ll have to catch up.
Seeker, as I told you, I have a great deal of sympathy for you as a mother. But…your posting style has changed a great deal. Text style “u” instead of “you”. And you are far less, I don’t know, classy in your responses.
I wonder if someone isn’t sharing this account with you? I get that it seems that for someone who believes her daughter that this forum can seem like whack-a-mole. And that can be frustrating. But your fundamental shift in style and (almost) taunting style seems to be an overreaction if it is due to frustration.
Sheilah
