Barisone assessment

[FitzE]

Also works!

It’s just notable to me that even completely disengaging is not enough for personalities like this. They are obsessive and relentless - and that’s disturbing.

Imagine having people like this in your home and barn!

[cutter99]

@Seeker1

This lack of understanding on your part cutter99 is not shocking.

My lack of understanding??? What a laughable comment!!!

I would pity you @Seeker1, but cannot seem to muster that emotion for you. If you are who you claim to be, I should pity you and feel sorry for you!

[cutter99]

@Seeker1

This lack of understanding on your part cutter99 is not shocking.

I am quoting this again for one reason only.

I have a feeling I hit the nail on the head with my previous post! This one down below! Is this a little too close to home @Seeker1???

@cutter99

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

@Seeker1

Michael pointed gun and tried to kill 2 people…not surprising to me that you don’t think that is in a category by itself. Very typical of your lack of logic

Kinda like “FINISH THE BASTARD” is in a category by itself?

You know, I have never said anything like that in 50 + years of life, and I have quite the mouth on me, so I would say that it is most definitely in its own category!

I agree with you @cutter99. Texting “finish the bastard” is not at all in the same category as shooting two people.

It’s more in the category of texting or saying “ruin her universe”.

Ah, but once again @CurrentlyHorseless, you are flat out wrong. It was never proven MB shot at one person let alone two IN A COURT OF LAW!

Not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity!

Before you start with BUT, BUT, BUT- the words “NOT GUILTY” do actually mean something, and not what YOU perceive them to mean!

He was determined by a court of law to have shot LK, with the caveat that he was legally insane at the time, and therefore NGRI of attempted murder of LK. That’s what the one count of NGRI means.

I personally think he probably also shot at RG.

Well I personally believe MB was jumped by LK and RG and the gun discharged in the squabble.

So there’s that.

You were wrong before. You are wrong now. But by all means keep showing everyone the version of things to be presented at trial.

@Knights_Mom- I will do you one better.

I do not believe Michael brought the gun to the house. I believe both LK and RG were responsible for the gun being at the house.

[MHM]

@FitzE

Imagine having people like this in your home and barn!

That thought has struck me many, many times. Considering what it’s like to interact with them online, when it’s easy enough to just completely ignore them, I would hate to think about the real life version of that.

[3PonyFarm]

I was unclear about the negotiations between the father and MB’s attorney. Was this for LK, RG and the horses to leave quicker than an eviction and whatever was stated on boarding contract? Since the new boarding place was rejected, the letter and process for formal eviction was started?

If it was for the horses alone, why was the negotiation even necessary? One could give the standard 30 day or whatever was in boarding contract and it is the responsibility of owner to find a new facility in that time frame.

Also, regarding breaking into the office to get to contracts and signatures. Is it common to use a notary for signatures in other areas of the country? For boarding contracts I was involved in we did not use a notary but I don’t think anyone ever thought about someone breaking into an office to change things either. I would think this would also be a very serious SS violation or should be.

[ekat]

@3PonyFarm

I was unclear about the negotiations between the father and MB’s attorney. Was this for LK, RG and the horses to leave quicker than an eviction and whatever was stated on boarding contract? Since the new boarding place was rejected, the letter and process for formal eviction was started?

The way Mr Tarshis testified, he and JK had negotiated getting her and the horses (and I assume RG, because someone needed to do the heavy lifting) moved to a barn 15 minutes up the road with a PanAm gold medalist trainer. As of Aug 2nd, he thought they’d be moving that weekend. Instead, chaos ensued, and he went with the emailed notice on the 5th, JK hired ED to handle “eviction matters” (per ED) also on the 5th, and she was served on the 6th with notice.

[3PonyFarm]

Thanks, it makes sense then that it as for the whole group and in a quicker time frame.

[eggbutt]

It is fascinating the only one apparently concerned enough to stop posting is @Inigo-montoya, whoever they are. Smart cookie.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Given that both @equkelly and @RND were banned, I infer that there is a fair amount of flagging done by the posters other than me.

I do sometimes flag posts that I think violate the rules of the forum, as my understanding is that is the recommended (by the mods) way of dealing with it.

@FitzE posted that I, specifically, had flagged a post of hers for some completely innocuous word. I suppose there is a tiny chance I could have flagged her post by mistake, although I really doubt it. Unless a poster is informed of who is flagging their post, which I doubt, I conclude she just made up the assertion about my flagging her post to make me look silly.

You’re an old hand. If @FitzEs post was flagged, would she have been informed of who flagged it? Or was she just making it up?

If someone lobs personal insults at posters they disagree with, and those posts are flagged, and the thread shut down, who is responsible for getting the thread shut down, the insulter or the flagger?

@CurrentlyHorseless

I was pointing out that @equkelly and @RND must have been flagged by people other than me in order to get banned.

@Seeker1

This lack of understanding on your part cutter99 is not shocking.

.

[Sdel]

@eggbutt

It is fascinating the only one apparently concerned enough to stop posting is @Inigo-montoya, whoever they are. Smart cookie.

They did one better…they stopped logging in…

[MHM]

@Sdel

@eggbutt

It is fascinating the only one apparently concerned enough to stop posting is @Inigo-montoya, whoever they are. Smart cookie.

They did one better…they stopped logging in…

Under that name, anyway.

[trubandloki]

@FitzE

Oh, I’m guessing this is someone harassing me? What a shocker.

Even completely ignoring people like this for ages (and not even participating in the last major thread) is not enough to back them off. One more bit of evidence in a pattern of relentless, obsessive, truly disturbing focus that these people have and exert against their targets, even when the target (in this case, me) completely disengages. This is reflective of what we learned about the behaviour of the ‘victims’ at trial. It seems birds of a feather flock together/a family that preys together, stays together.

It sheds light on what MB and the other people at the barn were faced with. People like this cannot give up, walk away, let it go, find another use for their time. They are incapable of controlling the impulse to go after someone once they’ve IDed that person as their target. It’s sick and scary.

And they wonder why they get banned? Oookaaay.

If this is about me, maybe someone can tell that poster to keep my name out their mouth? Although, I guess if they are STILL blathering on about me after all this time, it is a good PSA for others re: the true character of that poster. Plus/minus, I guess. Also, isn’t that kind of sustain obsession what that crew calls ‘living rent-free’ in someone’s head? Oh, how ironic.

There are a couple posters who I’ve deemed beneath contempt and not worthy of notice of any kind whatsoever. Their participation lowers the tone and the content of any discussion.
Blocking them has made these threads much more interesting and efficient for me.

You make an amazing point with this post. It does explain the endless support of LK by CH though. They clearly think alike. So what if someone has not said anything to them in ages, they need to make sure that the person knows they are not done with them.
So weird to tag someone in a post when that someone has not been around or talked about them.

[FitzE]

Creepy and unsettling, for sure.

[Seeker1]

Your lack of empathy/sympathy is the mark of …

[cutter99]

@Seeker1

Your lack of empathy/sympathy is the mark of …

Of what @Seeker1??? Do tell!!? The mark of what???

[trubandloki]

@Seeker1

Your lack of empathy/sympathy is the mark of …

a circus clown that sells cotton candy.

[Seeker1]

Could be

[trubandloki]

What does having a different theory on how the facts fit together some how equal a lack of empathy/sympathy and how is this more a sign of a lack of empathy/sympathy than admitting under oath to having a plan to ruin someone and “Finish The Bastard”?

[trubandloki]

@Seeker1

Could be

.

[cutter99]

@trubandloki

@Seeker1

Your lack of empathy/sympathy is the mark of …

a circus clown that sells cotton candy.

Someone who does not buy everything sold to them hook, line and sinker, especially when those doing the selling are liars, schemers and known drug addicts.