Barisone assessment

[cutter99]

Just going to leave this here. I apparently struck a nerve…AGAIN!

QFPing is not something out of the ordinary on this forum, especially when posters are known to “dirty edit and delete” posts. And I am a long way from QFPing all your posts @Seeker1!

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@MorganSercu

Calling the police five times wasn’t clear enough to the barefoot ninja, master 3D chess player, that she had worn out her welcome.

Got it. Suuper genius.

I think she understood “she had worn out her welcome”. Rather than using the legal process of giving her the thirty days notice that she was entitled to, Barisone chose to harass, intimidate and scare her because he couldn’t be bothered to wait the thirty days.

No one has answered my question as to why Barisone didn’t ask her to leave on June 1 or July 1 to vacate 30 days hence.

The 30 days notice she was entitled to as a legal tenant means he does not have the right to decide on July 25 that she has to be gone by August 7. He can request it. He can have his lawyer negotiate with her father. He can negotiate and offer to “buy her out”, but he went for harassment and intimidation, even before the gun violence. In his defense, my interpretation is that the insanity and delusions were in play well before August 7. He was not acting rationally.

He wanted to bully her out. She didn’t want to give in to a bully. If she had actually thought she was at risk of being shot and nearly killed, I think she would have made a different choice and allowed herself to be bullied off the premises.

Bully her out? He had a business and no longer wanted her as a customer. She knew he wanted her gone as evidenced as Daddy trying to negotiate a new place to go. And once more HER HORSES HAD NO TENANCY RIGHTS. HE COULD HAVE HAD THEM REMOVED AUGUST 1 AND THERE WAS NOTHING SHE COULD DO.

[eggbutt]

Flag this post as “other” and send your thoughts to the mods in the space provided.

[Sdel]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@MorganSercu

Calling the police five times wasn’t clear enough to the barefoot ninja, master 3D chess player, that she had worn out her welcome.

Got it. Suuper genius.

I think she understood “she had worn out her welcome”. Rather than using the legal process of giving her the thirty days notice that she was entitled to, Barisone chose to harass, intimidate and scare her because he couldn’t be bothered to wait the thirty days.

No one has answered my question as to why Barisone didn’t ask her to leave on June 1 or July 1 to vacate 30 days hence.

The 30 days notice she was entitled to as a legal tenant means he does not have the right to decide on July 25 that she has to be gone by August 7. He can request it. He can have his lawyer negotiate with her father. He can negotiate and offer to “buy her out”, but he went for harassment and intimidation, even before the gun violence. In his defense, my interpretation is that the insanity and delusions were in play well before August 7. He was not acting rationally.

He wanted to bully her out. She didn’t want to give in to a bully. If she had actually thought she was at risk of being shot and nearly killed, I think she would have made a different choice and allowed herself to be bullied off the premises.

Bully her out? He had a business and no longer wanted her as a customer. She knew he wanted her gone as evidenced as Daddy trying to negotiate a new place to go. And once more HER HORSES HAD NO TENANCY RIGHTS. HE COULD HAVE HAD THEM REMOVED AUGUST 1 AND THERE WAS NOTHING SHE COULD DO.

I do believe it was LK posting about preparing for a trial before the shooting….something about planting statements with the cops who showed up for 911 calls that would evidence perjury in a trial….

[FitzE]

Do I understand you were flagged and reported…to yourself?!

Just when you think it cannot possibly get more absurd.

[cutter99]

Aye yup!

[MorganSercu]

Someone remind me - when MB opened the safe, he was witnessed removing a gun - this was sworn testimony? Because if the ninja who wrote she had access to the room (how did she know?) could possibly have opened the safe thanks to illegal wiretapping, he could have seen a gun was missing.

Or I could be mixing up details thanks to my fading recollection.

Thanks in advance.

[cutter99]

I asked this yesterday as well. No one has ever placed the gun in Michael’s hand is my understanding.

ETA- The only ones who placed the gun in Michael’s hand were both impeached in the trial.

[ekat]

@MorganSercu

Someone remind me - when MB opened the safe, he was witnessed removing a gun - this was sworn testimony? Because if the ninja who wrote she had access to the room (how did she know?) could possibly have opened the safe thanks to illegal wiretapping, he could have seen a gun was missing.

@cutter99

I asked this yesterday as well. No one has ever placed the gun in Michael’s hand is my understanding

The only testimony about him getting the gun came from Dr Simring and Dr Moustache. No one ever actually saw him remove it.

[cutter99]

@ekat

@MorganSercu

Someone remind me - when MB opened the safe, he was witnessed removing a gun - this was sworn testimony? Because if the ninja who wrote she had access to the room (how did she know?) could possibly have opened the safe thanks to illegal wiretapping, he could have seen a gun was missing.

@cutter99

I asked this yesterday as well. No one has ever placed the gun in Michael’s hand is my understanding

The only testimony about him getting the gun came from Dr Simring and Dr Moustache. No one ever actually saw him remove it.

Yes, because neither of the doctors were there.

[KurPlexed]

@MorganSercu

and pretends she is a young debutante

sorry. I find this hilarious.

[Sdel]

@ekat

@MorganSercu

Someone remind me - when MB opened the safe, he was witnessed removing a gun - this was sworn testimony? Because if the ninja who wrote she had access to the room (how did she know?) could possibly have opened the safe thanks to illegal wiretapping, he could have seen a gun was missing.

@cutter99

I asked this yesterday as well. No one has ever placed the gun in Michael’s hand is my understanding

The only testimony about him getting the gun came from Dr Simring and Dr Moustache. No one ever actually saw him remove it.

Which was hearsay. And previous statements from the defense was that he didn’t remember just prior to CPS….

[Sdel]

Just so it is clear as to where some of the last couple of day’s comments are coming from…

[Mersidoats]

Question about forcibly moving someone’s horses - could that be horse theft? Do you have to have a reason for removing a boarders horses, “tying them to the mailbox” so to speak?

[trubandloki]

OH my, she is still going on about the letter from jail saying stuff that it does not say.

Strange, it seems like if the letter from jail said he did something it seems like the prosecution would have presented that at the trial.

[Knights_Mom]

I think it’s hilarious that she thinks she’s being slick posting as an alter given her style.

And her quotation marks must be exhausted.

[cutter99]

Why is she speaking of herself in third person?

[ekat]

@trubandloki

OH my, she is still going on about the letter from jail saying stuff that it does not say.

Strange, it seems like if the letter from jail said he did something it seems like the prosecution would have presented that at the trial.

I haven’t seen it, but if, in the letter from jail he had incriminated himself in any way, it never would have made it out of the jail to it’s intended recipient. It would have gone straight to the prosecutor, and you are right, Mr Schellhorn would have waived that all over the courtroom.

[Mersidoats]

She says she has receipts of payments she made to his staff?! Because he couldn’t lay them? What? Why are we only hearing about these this year, and not in previous years threads?

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat as far as the horses - being they had no tenancy rights as chattel and given there probably/maybe was/was not a boarding agreement, how should a barn owner un-residence the horses from the barn?