Barisone assessment

Here’s NJ’s law on the subject. I could be wrong but it appears the barn owner has a good bit of leeway.

https://www.animallaw.info/statute/nj-lien-horse-stable-2a44-51-right-lien-retention-property-when-amount-due-unpaid

4 Likes

Not all of them. At least one seems to be an ardent fan of LK and a hater of MHG more than MB. I don’t get the sense that any of them hate MB, just that they view events through a lens which filters out any responsibility LK has for her role in the situation.

11 Likes

Lol, I just posted the law. What are your thoughts? Seems to me the barn owner has some rights there.

https://www.animallaw.info/statute/nj-lien-horse-stable-2a44-51-right-lien-retention-property-when-amount-due-unpaid

4 Likes

But if no board is due? Basically a horsey Holdover

3 Likes

Would explain the claims they wanted her horses…

4 Likes

Let me keep digging. But, remember, one could presume in this case, that board was due, since RG only worked enough to break even on the board, and he testified he’d quit working, cuz, reasons…

Edit to add: NJ law also specifies other services due, like veterinary, farriers, etc.

7 Likes

There is more hate for MHG than anyone could have ever guessed. I would say the jealousy of MHG runs very, VERY deep!

21 Likes

Why would anyone want to coordinate posts or how to respond? Who has time for that and for what purpose? What a bizarre scenario.

10 Likes

So I wonder if the big bombshell then was the shovel in the truck?

13 Likes

You keep attacking my family. You stop i stop.

3 Likes

On YT she says even she didn’t know about the shovel until closing arguments. She has always wondered what the plan to dispose of their bodies was….

Complete 180……

12 Likes

Also, if the recordings had proven anything they would have been admitted into the criminal trial and things would have gone far differently.

“I could kill her” or “”I want to strangle her” is a figure of speech and does not prove a murder plot either.

LK is an Olympic level straw grasper IMO.

17 Likes

Then there is a big bombshell in my truck, along with a crow bar and tire iron.

Hmmmm, does this mean I need to have a victim already lined up, or am I just prepared?

9 Likes

I admit, it was hard to resist snarking the “What do you have in your truck” thread…

9 Likes

Yeah, super crazy. It became rather obvious at one time as though there were some behind the scenes discussions like sharks circling and planning an attack. It has apparently stopped the organized direction since LK is supposedly gone from the forum.

3 Likes

You guys bring up good points. I’ve had a parking citation and I have deadly tools of mass murder in my truck so I can’t be trusted.

8 Likes

Attacking your family? Really? All I’ve done is point out your daughter’s behavior - notice the YouTube screen shots. That’s not attacking your family.

So, what you’re saying, apparently, is if I stop posting you will stop posting. Right?

16 Likes

See, and with a name like @Warmblood1 you are probably warming up blood and drinking it for meals. Just like I cut and slash things!

22 Likes

Yeah but if it were due on one horse can you evict all of her horses?

My rough side says tie them to the telephone pole but I and probably not MB could morally do that. But I’m guessing that would not be illegal.

1 Like

On this point (and this alone) I’m going to agree with @Seeker1. While Michaels mental and physical injuries are very, very serious, I don’t think they can be equated with being shot twice in the chest, and the subsequent major surgeries to repair the damage.

However, this is not a contest about who suffered more. It’s a discussion of who is responsible and quite possibly legally liable.

We know Michael’s physical injuries and mental break were caused directly by Lauren and Rob (and poor Rosie).

Most of us don’t believe the shoddy police investigation and the evidence produced provides enough evidence to conclude that Michael shot the gun which caused Lauren’s injuries. The jury believed he shot the gun, but that he wasn’t legally responsible for his actions if he did shoot her.

Who was responsible for the state of affairs which led up to the shooting? Again all the evidence available shows Lauren and Rob were the primary instigators and that Michael was just reacting. Furthermore it was 100% within their power to resolve the situation by simply leaving. Michael had no such option. He had a home, family, clients, and horses to protect from a clear and present threat. He was effectively trapped with no way out.

23 Likes