She outed herself inocously like 10 years ago but it took obsessing review of ancient posts to find that occurrence and THAT’S the point.
Prove otherwise?
hut-ho78: Knights_Mom: ekat: Knights_Mom:So saying (giving notice) take them out by X date or I’m loading up the trailer and taking them to the auction
That and/or pay what you owe me by X date or they’re going to auction so I can recoup some of my losses.
But rather than a nonpayment eviction consider a scenario where you just don’t want that boarder there anymore. Because you hate the boarder.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
No. You’re making an incorrect correlation there and coming to an unsupported conclusion. That’s not what was implied. At all.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
hut-ho78: Warmblood1: ohnoO:Has she really quit riding, as someone way, way up thread said?
Not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if she voluntarily quit riding to further her argument that she is being discriminated against and that she is suffering from a lack of riding to help her case.
Considering all the holes in her core and her collapsed lung and destroyed breast and implant and ribs being split to clamp the aortic artery plus the being sliced open through all the abdominal muscles so her organs had room to swell so she could breathe, it may be she is in physical therapy to stretch out scar tissue.
Can you repeat that one more time? I don’t think you’ve said that before and no one knows that. Clearly.
/sarcasm
You don’t know how/why/if/when she quit. Do you? You’re merely guessing along with others. Why is what you say anymore valid?
She did suffer injuries, but from what was said in previous threads by other posters and LK herself, she was riding and getting along quite ok. Who knows why she did or didn’t stop. Who really cares, tbh.
Actually I find I care. I hope she is riding and successful and MB can rebuild his life. It would be nice to see them turn this around into a success. Right now, it’s just too sad.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent
We were talking about a purely hypothetical situation about horses and when and how to remove them from a barn, per NJ statutes. Again, context is your friend. We weren’t talking about MB. There was no implication that he hated anyone, and certainly no assignment of criminal intent, especially since neither of us believe he actually shot her, but that’s a different argument.
Edit to add: the conversation was between me and Knight’s Mom. Cantering Carrot read and followed along through the context. But they never said a thing about hating anyone.
So. Clueless.
Cynical much?
Yes, you said it was just her personal bias. Which insuated that what Eggbutt said wasn’t the truth and was just how she sees it. Can you prove that what Eggbutt said isn’t the truth? Can you prove that is actually a personal bias/a skewed truth? Can you prove that what she said is wrong? You don’t think that any of that was demonstrated at the trial? I think examples of personality traits were indeed shown at the trial. The victim’s own words and mannerisms showed that.
That’s what I meant by prove otherwise. Hope that clarification helps.
CanteringCarrot: hut-ho78: Knights_Mom: ekat: Knights_Mom:So saying (giving notice) take them out by X date or I’m loading up the trailer and taking them to the auction
That and/or pay what you owe me by X date or they’re going to auction so I can recoup some of my losses.
But rather than a nonpayment eviction consider a scenario where you just don’t want that boarder there anymore. Because you hate the boarder.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
No. You’re making an incorrect correlation there and coming to an unsupported conclusion. That’s not what was implied. At all.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
MB had EVERY REASON to fear the multi state arrest record addicts and their dog. I also firmly believe THEY ATTACKED HIM.
Add to that he was beaten to a pulp while being forced to involuntarily play a game of Bizarro Stratego while being stalked by the Suboxone Ninja while being sleep deprived trying to protect his customers horses from harm and who knows maybe a barn fire?
If you haven’t noticed the folks here and on FB and on YouTube as well as the JURY pretty much unanimously agree that it was the actions of LK that drove this sad, ridiculous, unnecessary, twisted, malignant story to its conclusion.
MBs belief that LK/RG were threats was no delusion. It was legitimate and it was real. Hell, she even shot at RG!
And if this goes to trial civilly it will just be yet another group of people to see it too.
CanteringCarrot: hut-ho78: Knights_Mom: ekat: Knights_Mom:So saying (giving notice) take them out by X date or I’m loading up the trailer and taking them to the auction
That and/or pay what you owe me by X date or they’re going to auction so I can recoup some of my losses.
But rather than a nonpayment eviction consider a scenario where you just don’t want that boarder there anymore. Because you hate the boarder.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
No. You’re making an incorrect correlation there and coming to an unsupported conclusion. That’s not what was implied. At all.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
Can you show me where I said “hated the boarder” please?
You’re making a huge jump. Hating someone does not equal nor is it proof alone of criminal intent.
I said “hated the boarder” when forming and explaining a hypothetical horse eviction narrative as a question to an attorney because I was not sure what law states about removing unwanted chattel.
CanteringCarrot: hut-ho78: Warmblood1: ohnoO:Has she really quit riding, as someone way, way up thread said?
Not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if she voluntarily quit riding to further her argument that she is being discriminated against and that she is suffering from a lack of riding to help her case.
Considering all the holes in her core and her collapsed lung and destroyed breast and implant and ribs being split to clamp the aortic artery plus the being sliced open through all the abdominal muscles so her organs had room to swell so she could breathe, it may be she is in physical therapy to stretch out scar tissue.
Can you repeat that one more time? I don’t think you’ve said that before and no one knows that. Clearly.
/sarcasm
You don’t know how/why/if/when she quit. Do you? You’re merely guessing along with others. Why is what you say anymore valid?
She did suffer injuries, but from what was said in previous threads by other posters and LK herself, she was riding and getting along quite ok. Who knows why she did or didn’t stop. Who really cares, tbh.
Actually I find I care. I hope she is riding and successful and MB can rebuild his life. It would be nice to see them turn this around into a success. Right now, it’s just too sad.
I mean, yeah, I generally wish the best for all involved. I’m just not so interested or invested in LK’s riding. I don’t know if she stopped, why she stopped, or what she’s doing. She was riding according to others, and you also don’t have to ride to enjoy horses. I don’t know what her goals or plans are. I think that she can find success but maybe her attitude on a few things might need to change. I also don’t know what her current definition of success is (this varies individual to individual). So while I wish them the best and hope that they all can move on with life, I’m just not that into the fine details, I guess.
hut-ho78: CanteringCarrot: hut-ho78: Knights_Mom: ekat: Knights_Mom:So saying (giving notice) take them out by X date or I’m loading up the trailer and taking them to the auction
That and/or pay what you owe me by X date or they’re going to auction so I can recoup some of my losses.
But rather than a nonpayment eviction consider a scenario where you just don’t want that boarder there anymore. Because you hate the boarder.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
No. You’re making an incorrect correlation there and coming to an unsupported conclusion. That’s not what was implied. At all.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
MB had EVERY REASON to fear the multi state arrest record addicts and their dog. I also firmly believe THEY ATTACKED HIM.
Add to that he was beaten to a pulp while being forced to involuntarily play a game of Bizarro Stratego while being stalked by the Suboxone Ninja while being sleep deprived trying to protect his customers horses from harm and who knows maybe a barn fire?
If you haven’t noticed the folks here and on FB and on YouTube as well as the JURY pretty much unanimously agree that it was the actions of LK that drove this sad, ridiculous, unnecessary, twisted, malignant story to its conclusion.
MBs belief that LK/RG were threats was no delusion. It was legitimate and it was real. Hell, she even shot a RG!
And if this goes to trial civilly it will just be yet another group of people to see it too.
The jury said he was delusional and that caused him to shoot her. The jury agreed with the defense mental health expert witnesses who both said MB was delusional. They did not say she made him that way. That was not the verdict. She was not on trial. He was on trial for shooting her twice.
That is the problem. There are a few posters who don’t understand the verdict. The jury did not find her guilty because she was the victim not the defendant. They found him delusional so no criminal intent yet he won’t be released until deemed not a danger to himself or others.
There are two people who made bad decisions. He made several of them but was under tremendous stress from major life changes and instability. She made several poor decisions. She did not shoot anyone. He did. Big difference.
May they both find healing.
CanteringCarrot:So. Clueless.
Cynical much?
Yeah, I tend to be a bit cynical. Life experiences have contributed to that. Sometimes I’m just not sure that you’re reading or keeping up with these threads because some of the things that you say (Ulf’s barn?) don’t make sense or were already proven otherwise.
That is the problem. There are a few posters who don’t understand the verdict. The jury did not find her guilty because she was the victim not the defendant. They found him delusional so no criminal intent yet he won’t be released until deemed not a danger to himself or others.
You know, it’s ok to perfectly understand the verdict and not agree with it for a single second. If I were on that jury it would have hung because I have yet to see any evidence that convinces me beyond a reasonable doubt that Michael Barisone shot anyone.
Knights_Mom: hut-ho78: CanteringCarrot: hut-ho78: Knights_Mom: ekat: Knights_Mom:So saying (giving notice) take them out by X date or I’m loading up the trailer and taking them to the auction
That and/or pay what you owe me by X date or they’re going to auction so I can recoup some of my losses.
But rather than a nonpayment eviction consider a scenario where you just don’t want that boarder there anymore. Because you hate the boarder.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
No. You’re making an incorrect correlation there and coming to an unsupported conclusion. That’s not what was implied. At all.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
MB had EVERY REASON to fear the multi state arrest record addicts and their dog. I also firmly believe THEY ATTACKED HIM.
Add to that he was beaten to a pulp while being forced to involuntarily play a game of Bizarro Stratego while being stalked by the Suboxone Ninja while being sleep deprived trying to protect his customers horses from harm and who knows maybe a barn fire?
If you haven’t noticed the folks here and on FB and on YouTube as well as the JURY pretty much unanimously agree that it was the actions of LK that drove this sad, ridiculous, unnecessary, twisted, malignant story to its conclusion.
MBs belief that LK/RG were threats was no delusion. It was legitimate and it was real. Hell, she even shot a RG!
And if this goes to trial civilly it will just be yet another group of people to see it too.
The jury said he was delusional and that caused him to shoot her. The jury agreed with the defense mental health expert witnesses who both said MB was delusional. They did not say she made him that way. That was not the verdict. She was not on trial. He was on trial for shooting her twice.
That is the problem. There are a few posters who don’t understand the verdict. The jury did not find her guilty because she was the victim not the defendant. They found him delusional so no criminal intent yet he won’t be released until deemed not a danger to himself or others.
There are two people who made bad decisions. He made several of them but was under tremendous stress from major life changes and instability. She made several poor decisions. She did not shoot anyone. He did. Big difference.
May they both find healing.
Nobody thinks that LK was found guilty? No one said she was on trial for a crime. She was involved in the trial as a victim/witness. She is, essentially, on trial re the civil suits.
I believe that the jury accepted that LK contributed to MB’s mental breakdown. There was no option for them to directly state “she made him that way” there was no “Not guilty, she made him that way” option. So I’m not sure how you can say they did not say that…I mean yeah, there was no option to. So it’s a weak point.
I also don’t get what " they found him delusional so no criminal intent, yet he won’t be released until…" means? What’s your point there. He had mental issues/a breakdown so of course he needs evaluation before being released. Normal procedure and this is for the benefit of him and everyone else. It doesn’t show criminal intent at all. The fact that he wasn’t instantly releases does not demonstrate criminal intent.
A general remark about life that is pertinent to this specific case.
When decent people discover that they are involved with not decent people, decent people cut ties with the not decent people.
This does not a “mean” comment make. Just a statement of truth.
Knights_Mom: hut-ho78: CanteringCarrot: hut-ho78: Knights_Mom: ekat: Knights_Mom:So saying (giving notice) take them out by X date or I’m loading up the trailer and taking them to the auction
That and/or pay what you owe me by X date or they’re going to auction so I can recoup some of my losses.
But rather than a nonpayment eviction consider a scenario where you just don’t want that boarder there anymore. Because you hate the boarder.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
No. You’re making an incorrect correlation there and coming to an unsupported conclusion. That’s not what was implied. At all.
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
MB had EVERY REASON to fear the multi state arrest record addicts and their dog. I also firmly believe THEY ATTACKED HIM.
Add to that he was beaten to a pulp while being forced to involuntarily play a game of Bizarro Stratego while being stalked by the Suboxone Ninja while being sleep deprived trying to protect his customers horses from harm and who knows maybe a barn fire?
If you haven’t noticed the folks here and on FB and on YouTube as well as the JURY pretty much unanimously agree that it was the actions of LK that drove this sad, ridiculous, unnecessary, twisted, malignant story to its conclusion.
MBs belief that LK/RG were threats was no delusion. It was legitimate and it was real. Hell, she even shot a RG!
And if this goes to trial civilly it will just be yet another group of people to see it too.
The jury said he was delusional and that caused him to shoot her. The jury agreed with the defense mental health expert witnesses who both said MB was delusional. They did not say she made him that way. That was not the verdict. She was not on trial. He was on trial for shooting her twice.
That is the problem. There are a few posters who don’t understand the verdict. The jury did not find her guilty because she was the victim not the defendant. They found him delusional so no criminal intent yet he won’t be released until deemed not a danger to himself or others.
There are two people who made bad decisions. He made several of them but was under tremendous stress from major life changes and instability. She made several poor decisions. She did not shoot anyone. He did. Big difference.
May they both find healing.
“I completely understand the verdict” KM said to the person she’s corrected on law innumerable times.
I think some are being a bit too black and white or extreme re MB being delusional. Just because you’re delusional doesn’t mean that you reject ALL reality or that some things aren’t in fact true.
The fact that a person might recognize something that is true or real doesn’t mean that they’re not at all delusional.
For example, MB could’ve recognized the situation as being bad and realized he got too involved with some bad people. He then became delusional when all of the pressure(s) built up around him and some memories and experiences from his past were triggered, and things essentially became amplified, confusing, and frightening in his head. He was then, at that point out of touch with reality and/or unable to think rationally.
For someone to be delusional they don’t have to be since day 1, they can become delusional due to a variety of factors. Sometimes people are delusional since day 1 and are delusional about many things and reality in general.
You can regonize something as real, and it is real, but then descend into delusion. It’s entirely possible to come out of being delusional too, it depends on why you were delusional/what caused the delusions.
I dont know third base!!
@Sdel brought up the fact that I asked a question on the technical forum as to whether a poster whose post is flagged is notified of as to the identity of who flagged the post. I had assumed not, but you had publically posted that I, specifically, had flagged a post of yours for some innocuous word. I’m pretty sure I did not flag any such post, but your claim that I had flagged it suggested the possibility that posters are in fact notified of the screen name that has flagged a specific post.
In response to Sdel bringing up my post in the technical forum, I explained why I asked the question.
If you had not publicly posted that I supposedly had flagged your post (I’m pretty sure I didn’t), I would not have posted the question on the technical forum.
No one responded to my question, but I’m back to assuming a poster is not notified of the identity of the person who has flagged it.This was all at least a month ago, but Sdel chose to bring up my post in the technical forum today.
So if you want me to refrain from invoking your screen name, perhaps you could refrain from invoking mine?
Hrmm…ok
LOL. Are there enough of us in the minority to constitute a gang?
But you’re wrong. I have never attempted to coordinate the flagging of posts with the tiny number of like minded posters that remain. I flag the posts that I, individually, think violate the forum rules, and coordinate with nobody.
My question on the technical forum was asking whether a poster with a flagged post was notified as to who flagged it. No one answered my question, so I’m back to assuming that the identity of the flagger is not conveyed to the poster, although obviously the mods would have that information.
You are so clueless eggbutt.
If FitzE has me on mute, how did she write the post that I’m responding to here? I suppose she’s representing that she’s responding to Sdel, not me, but she’s clearly addressing me.
Besides, unless she has you on ignore, you just tagged her.
Making sense is often not all its cracked up to be. You are the perfect example of that eggbutt.
NG =/= NGRI
I was merely explaining to Sdel as to why I posted the question on flagging in the technical forum. I am not stalking you. The question originated from your claim that you knew that I in particular had flagged a post of yours over some innocuous word.
I guess it is true you have not “tagged” me, but you have posted several derogatory posts about me just today, including this one, so saying you have not “engaged me” rings pretty hollow.
Going forward, I would like nothing more than to be genuinely ignored by you.
To the contrary, I would have voted NGRI myself if I had been on the jury. I just think it’s a very different verdict from straight NG.
Inappropriate attack.
Neither. This was a tragic event. MB destroyed his own life and nearly killed LK. What is offensive is the continued trashing of LK.
3 days for disorderly plus wait time for available judge.
It sure looks like y’all are really good at flagging considering the banned posters.
Why do you incessantly continue to tell other posters what and when they can post or not to post?
It’s a public forum, open for everyone.
Bleeding out. Having her aorta clamped by a thoracic surgeon to stop the bleeding. Having her implant and breast destroyed. Being cut open from stem to stern to allow her organs room to swell so she can breathe. Being placed into an induced coma for days. Hospitalized for 19 days.
That is nonsense. Y’all QFP and fuss about edits and deleted when everyone does it. A post is deleted because someone thought better if it or rewrote it or edited typing errors or something nonsensical written hurriedly. Everyone with an opinion on these threads has done this.
Also wrong. She should have left. He should not have shot her. That he shot her is proven by NGRI. He is not criminally liable but now deemed a danger to himself or others so he in involuntarily institutionalized indefinitely with required reviews where a judge must look at state psychiatrists’ recommendations and decide if he continues to be a danger to himself or others.
He is, according to googled law articles in New Jersey, still potentially civilly liable.
And another wrong one. Wishing MHG well. It must have been traumatizing to know her beloved lost control and tried to kill a client. She testified he told her and the DCCP person out of the office and the police search team found the safe open shortly after the shooting. She came across well on the stand and was a tremendous source of information. Very interesting testimony.
All one to two of us at a time, you know, the ones irritated by the constant LK bashing. What a gang especially because we don’t know each other.
What was testified to was “get rid of her” by MHG and she clarified it was for LK to move out. “Get rid of her” after one is shot twice in the chest and nearly died could certainly take on a more sinister tone subsequent to the shooting even if meant innocently.
Yet he could have killed them easily with his strength and size or used the shovel or crow bar yet he got the gun out of the safe and toted it over there. Overkill.
Excellent comment @CurrentlyHorseless.
Nonsense. You know who gets the threads closed down. Those who attack others personally, those who try to guess who others are, name callers, etc. it has never been @CurrentlyHorseless.
Why do you keep calling him up? Do you like him so much you miss his comments?
The shooter, the same guy who got NGRI because if it had not been proven he shot her beyond a reasonable doubt it would have been NG.
May he recover and rebuild his life and may she get continue riding and improving.
You have such good information except when you try overly hard to make a point and lose all logic. Had he evicted he in August or July 2019, she would have been out long before March 2020.
Not about the trial. That is your personal bias.
That sounds like you think he did know what he was doing. Do you think he fooled the jury?
Except when you are telling us all the latest you heard from your so called sources. @eggbutt has said that she heard LK is not longer riding and the substitute trainer while the main trainer was out of country recently quit.
Memory returns.
Considering all the holes in her core and her collapsed lung and destroyed breast and implant and ribs being split to clamp the aortic artery plus the being sliced open through all the abdominal muscles so her organs had room to swell so she could breathe, it may be she is in physical therapy to stretch out scar tissue.
Hi @CurrentlyHorseless!
When I called out behavior by calling it “junior high” I had two posts flagged. I have no idea who flagged them and only know because the mods private message me they were flagged and deleted. When someone objected to a word on an earlier post, I also received a private message from the mods that the word had been edited. I think they may have left a message in the post for the edit as well.Earlier today, I flagged a post calling posters juvenile as it seems to be against the “junior high” rule. I’m curious to see if that one survives or if it has to have multiple flags.
I started flagging posts I find excessively cruel instead of descending into bickering and getting threads shut down for the bickering. Sometimes the mods seem to agree and delete them.
And you know this how? Oh wait. It’s just another mean post.
My guess is that Ali Brock helped get her relocated to that barn.
NGRI
Been old for a long time.
Perhaps he is a professional and concerned with the reputation of the sport and saddened over MB’s breakdown and LK being shot twice. Perhaps they are just good and decent people trying to help make a very sad situation better.
Why do you continuously appoint yourself the COTH posting etiquette police? It’s hilarious.
Ali seemed heartbroken over MB’s breakdown and the entire situation. I posted and just did again that I would not be surprised if she helped LK relocate her horses to Ulf’s barn in Florida. Ali seems to be a professional who believes in the good of the sport and would hate all the bad press and tawdry bickering.
Oh my gosh, this from the person who incessantly posts instructions to other posters on how to post, when to post, when not to post.
Yes of course until he did shoot her twice. NGRI. Proven in court.
It would except his subsequent action of shooting her twice. NGRI. Proven in court.
You voluntarily outed yourself on your own post. LK would have been banned for outing you just as YD was banned for outing someone in a private message. This one is yours.
He called himself him. I don’t know him and wouldn’t know that except for his own post.
Prove otherwise?
You said “hated the boarder.” MB is NGRI because he was under a delusion about the boarder being a threat. If you think he hated the boarder then do you believe he actually did attempt murder? He received the NGRI because he wasn’t capable of a criminal intent because of a delusion. Hating a boarder sounds like you think he had criminal intent.
Actually I find I care. I hope she is riding and successful and MB can rebuild his life. It would be nice to see them turn this around into a success. Right now, it’s just too sad.
Cynical much?
The jury said he was delusional and that caused him to shoot her. The jury agreed with the defense mental health expert witnesses who both said MB was delusional. They did not say she made him that way. That was not the verdict. She was not on trial. He was on trial for shooting her twice.
That is the problem. There are a few posters who don’t understand the verdict. The jury did not find her guilty because she was the victim not the defendant. They found him delusional so no criminal intent yet he won’t be released until deemed not a danger to himself or others.
There are two people who made bad decisions. He made several of them but was under tremendous stress from major life changes and instability. She made several poor decisions. She did not shoot anyone. He did. Big difference.
May they both find healing.
.
Add to that he was beaten to a pulp while being forced to involuntarily play a game of Bizarro Stratego while being stalked by the Suboxone Ninja while being sleep deprived trying to protect his customers horses from harm and who knows maybe a barn fire?
Two grown adults who don’t know how to unplug a dryer. One of them is supposedly capable of renovating a house too. Instead he painted himself unto a corner.
I suspect they were “worried about the dryer” while sneaking around the barn when they shouldn’t be. Planning to break into the locked office to falsify documents and bust into the gun safe too was also part of their planned activities. Date night looks very different for some people.