Barisone assessment

[Knights_Mom]

@ekat

@KurPlexed

Yes there are. I watched again last night with my husband. He can’t get enough of it all. He’s just beyond amazed.

If I were part of her legal team for the civil trial, the impression she left with those viewers would concern me greatly.

I can’t wait for this to go to trial because I’m sure of what will happen.

[cheval_convert]

I’m just catching up, but wouldn’t RG, contractor extraordinaire, be able to do any renovations for little to no money?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@smoofox

@CurrentlyHorseless

1. No, I didn’t realize someone could get banned without being flagged. How would a poster be banned without someone bringing their behavior to the attention of the mods by flagging the offensive posts?

2. Is it considered bad behavior by the mods to “tag” or mention a banned poster? I mentioned both Equkelly and RND, and happened to do so by using their full screen name with the @. Are you saying its OK to mention a banned poster but just not OK to include the @??? You and others are constantly bringing up YD; is it acceptable to mention a banned poster as long as one omits the @? What difference does it make whether one happens to include the @?

1. Because maybe they have brought their posting behavior to the attention of the mods… or mods have been messaged about them or they have replied to mods in an inappropriate way… yet you maintain it is exclusively due to flagging, flagging, flagging - were you not bragging about flagging posts a while back? So many posts lecturing others about how to post and what to post about… my recollection may not be clear.

2. But why are you tagging them? As a way to show that you think they were wronged and you want them to know it and applaud you for it? If they were banned from the forum, they will not see it - which is what the @CurrentlyHorseless does (by example) - it is a notification to that poster. You can mention whoever the hell you like - but tagging them like that repeatedly if they cannot even get the notifications is just a grandiose exercise in futility. It is also something YD embraced - constantly tagging everyone and anyone ad nauseum - not a tactic to admire or adopt, IMO. Quoting someone - and then tagging them as well in your(g) reply - is just redundant and specious. They will get a notification for the quote - as well as the tag. And the next tag. And the one after that.

Deja vu… I have had this conversation before…

1. Re bolded. Posters can be banned because “the mods have been messaged about them”? You’re saying that rather than using the flagging button, posters use a PM to the mods instead? That just sounds like a more general version of the idea of “flagging”. I think you’ve confirmed that banning occurs when someone brings the bad behavior to the attention of the mods, whether with the flag button or by PM. No, I was not “bragging about” flagging a while back, and I have never used PM to complain to the mods about the behavior of another poster.

2. I wished to mention the banned posters Equkelly and RND. I happened to throw in the @, when I did so. I had no idea throwing in the @ mattered for anything. I still don’t understand why it matters for a banned poster who will not see it anyway. I trust the moderators decisions. Why would my mentioning the banned posters, with or without the @, suggest that I thought they were “wronged”?

3. I also did not realize that using the tagging feature of the forum when addressing active posters was considered offensive. I don’t object to being tagged. You’re right that it’s redundant if you’re quoting @screennameA, but it’s not redundant if you’re referring to @screennameB while quoting @screennameA.

4. I receive many, many notifications that I’ve been quoted by trubandloki, and have been able to simply ignore that form of harassment. For months. Do you have an opinion on the forum etiquette regarding that tiresome tactic?

[MorganSercu]

I wish to nail jelly to the wall.

Lauren testified, under oath, that she is diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder AND Narcissistic Personality Disorder - correct?

If so, well, I need to pay up because I was inclined towards another, related, personality disorder diagnosis. Someone is getting a half-bushel of crabs.

[MorganSercu]

Wouldn’t matter. Unlicensed contractor.

[Knights_Mom]

@cheval_convert

I’m just catching up, but wouldn’t RG, contractor extraordinaire, be able to do any renovations for little to no money?

I wouldn’t want him to. Some contractors rig stuff in a way only they know what’s wrong so if they don’t get paid there’s built in retribution.

[Knights_Mom]

@MorganSercu

I wish to nail jelly to the wall.

Lauren testified, under oath, that she is diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder AND Narcissistic Personality Disorder - correct?

If so, well, I need to pay up because I was inclined towards another, related, personality disorder diagnosis. Someone is getting a half-bushel of crabs.

I guess this means we can comment on it being she admitted it as previous posts had been flagged for identifying the malignant narcissist part. But now I know I can speak freely on this being it was admitted to.

[cheval_convert]

You do realize I was being sarcastic?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Warmblood1

@CurrentlyHorseless

I have never said that MB “woke up one day, gave a 1-2 day notice and shot her”.

No one said it was a direct quote. But you continue to portray the idea that MB did not negotiate with his own lawyer, LK and JK for a week, possible two, to have LK moved to a facility 15 minutes down the road with a suitable trainer, and that LK refused. How is this indicative of her being in any way malleable? Her behavior showed no indication that she would honor the eviction and quietly leave. “Finish the Bastard.” You keep asserting that a buy-out was the appropriate route and I completely disagree.

LK/RG posed as a risk not only to MB but to everyone and everything on the farm. LK has gone above and beyond to prove that - barefoot ninja, illegal recordings, late night disturbances, threats on SM, discussions about handguns, a violent past, the list goes on.

I fully acknowledge that through his lawyer, MB had been negotiating with JK for some period of time prior to Aug 5. I did not specifically state it because I thought everyone knew it.

I believe she was on board with the idea of a negotiated departure, but did not agree to the proposed deal presented on Aug 5/6 and intended to continue negotiations via ED.

[MorganSercu]

No, sorry. I lose track of people (and tone) regularly. That is why I use the sarcasm font (/s), in case others have the same issue or a brain hiccup.

That is on me - not you!

[Angela_Freda]

@LexInVA

I have not heard of any actual signed contract and what has been said indicates the use of informal verbal agreements, stemming from the discussions between the interested parties, those being MB and JK-LK/RG

I had wondered about this.
Sure, it could have been a mistake on MBs part to not get one signed.
However, it could have been that someone hedged on signing one also, say after breaking rules in previous contracts and not wanting to be held to any standards?
.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I fully acknowledge that through his lawyer, MB had been negotiating with JK for some period of time prior to Aug 5. I did not specifically state it because I thought everyone knew it.

I believe she was on board with the idea of a negotiated departure, but did not agree to the proposed deal presented on Aug 5/6 and intended to continue negotiations via ED.

Your belief would be contrary to what two lawyers testified under oath to.

[cheval_convert]

I am lucky I know how to turn on the computer, so sarcasm font may be beyond me, but I will try to do better.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Warmblood1

@CurrentlyHorseless

I have never said that MB “woke up one day, gave a 1-2 day notice and shot her”.

No one said it was a direct quote. But you continue to portray the idea that MB did not negotiate with his own lawyer, LK and JK for a week, possible two, to have LK moved to a facility 15 minutes down the road with a suitable trainer, and that LK refused. How is this indicative of her being in any way malleable? Her behavior showed no indication that she would honor the eviction and quietly leave. “Finish the Bastard.” You keep asserting that a buy-out was the appropriate route and I completely disagree.

LK/RG posed as a risk not only to MB but to everyone and everything on the farm. LK has gone above and beyond to prove that - barefoot ninja, illegal recordings, late night disturbances, threats on SM, discussions about handguns, a violent past, the list goes on.

I fully acknowledge that through his lawyer, MB had been negotiating with JK for some period of time prior to Aug 5. I did not specifically state it because I thought everyone knew it.

I believe she was on board with the idea of a negotiated departure, but did not agree to the proposed deal presented on Aug 5/6 and intended to continue negotiations via ED.

How would YOU know she was “on board with it?” She was on board with just a few things: torturing MB, making him and MHG pay/punishment and according to your recent post, grifting MB out of money to restore his peace of mind.

Ya know, terrorism.

[eggbutt]

@Seeker1

I believe eggbutt to be a very misguided and angry person.

Right. Boy, I sure do respect your opinion and diagnosis! (Sarcasm spelled out just for your comprehension.)

My “guidance” is truth. There is no anger in speaking truth to anyone.

Bring it on @Seeker1 I definitely can handle anything you and your cohorts have to say. So far I’ve got a pretty good track record of being correct and truthful about this situation.

[Angela_Freda]

Please post that here for all if us to view, if you would?

[Angela_Freda]

She also boasted about having access to the office and to being able to forge, iirc.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Warmblood1

@CurrentlyHorseless

I have never said that MB “woke up one day, gave a 1-2 day notice and shot her”.

No one said it was a direct quote. But you continue to portray the idea that MB did not negotiate with his own lawyer, LK and JK for a week, possible two, to have LK moved to a facility 15 minutes down the road with a suitable trainer, and that LK refused. How is this indicative of her being in any way malleable? Her behavior showed no indication that she would honor the eviction and quietly leave. “Finish the Bastard.” You keep asserting that a buy-out was the appropriate route and I completely disagree.

LK/RG posed as a risk not only to MB but to everyone and everything on the farm. LK has gone above and beyond to prove that - barefoot ninja, illegal recordings, late night disturbances, threats on SM, discussions about handguns, a violent past, the list goes on.

I fully acknowledge that through his lawyer, MB had been negotiating with JK for some period of time prior to Aug 5. I did not specifically state it because I thought everyone knew it.

I believe she was on board with the idea of a negotiated departure, but did not agree to the proposed deal presented on Aug 5/6 and intended to continue negotiations via ED.

How would YOU know she was “on board with it?” She was on board with just a few things: torturing MB, making him and MHG pay/punishment and according to your recent post, grifting MB out of money to restore his peace of mind.

Ya know, terrorism.

I think Ekat referred to it as “cash for keys” and said it was a not uncommon (legal) way for a landlord to avoid all the time and expense of eviction.

[MorganSercu]

No worries and it is much appreciated.

I will now indulge in some sarcasm myself.

Robert Goodwin is a great person! /s
I would trust Lauren Kanarek. /s

Lauren is no longer a member, so speculating on her state of mind & diagnoses is fair game (if we follow the letter but not the spirit of the rules). That is how I was able to put forward my opinions regarding 45**'s mental state and motivations.

But it is better when the subject testifies in an open court regarding their diagnoses.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Warmblood1

@CurrentlyHorseless

I have never said that MB “woke up one day, gave a 1-2 day notice and shot her”.

No one said it was a direct quote. But you continue to portray the idea that MB did not negotiate with his own lawyer, LK and JK for a week, possible two, to have LK moved to a facility 15 minutes down the road with a suitable trainer, and that LK refused. How is this indicative of her being in any way malleable? Her behavior showed no indication that she would honor the eviction and quietly leave. “Finish the Bastard.” You keep asserting that a buy-out was the appropriate route and I completely disagree.

LK/RG posed as a risk not only to MB but to everyone and everything on the farm. LK has gone above and beyond to prove that - barefoot ninja, illegal recordings, late night disturbances, threats on SM, discussions about handguns, a violent past, the list goes on.

I fully acknowledge that through his lawyer, MB had been negotiating with JK for some period of time prior to Aug 5. I did not specifically state it because I thought everyone knew it.

I believe she was on board with the idea of a negotiated departure, but did not agree to the proposed deal presented on Aug 5/6 and intended to continue negotiations via ED.

How would YOU know she was “on board with it?” She was on board with just a few things: torturing MB, making him and MHG pay/punishment and according to your recent post, grifting MB out of money to restore his peace of mind.

Ya know, terrorism.

I think Ekat referred to it as “cash for keys” and said it was a not uncommon (legal) way for a landlord to avoid all the time and expense of eviction.

I know EXACTLY what cash for keys is BUT IT DOES NOT APPLY TO BOARDED HORSES. THERE ARE NO TENANCY RIGHTS FOR CHATTEL.

It seems MB should have had the horses removed first as is quite doable under law.

So in the future, should anyone have this issue GET THE HORSES REMOVED FIRST. SEND THEM TO THE SHERIFF OR TO THE AUCTUON.