I believe the comparison here is due to LKās frequent insistence that Michael wanted her horses. Michael had no need for horses of their training and ability. The comparison is that GrP horses are quite a bit different from 3rd level horses and definitely different from Olympic caliber horses. No one has said Laurenās horses were nags, only they were not what she wanted people to believe.
This 100%. This is me, too. I donāt even ride or know much about dressage outside of eventing. I never heard of him before this case and certainly never met him. I donāt even live in the same country. I have no allegiance to or personal interest in him whatsoever.
But, I did know one āLK-liteā personality and one (and lite) was enough!
This is where it gets relevant to a jury. They donāt need to relate to MB; they just need to have had or heard of an LK type in their lives or the lives of their loved ones and they will not be very receptive to what sheās trying to sell them. Or, if there has been an addict in their lives or the lives of their loved ones and they have experienced the chaos and pain that brings. I think, regardless of fairness, some folks are not adequately appreciating the difficulty faced by really unlikeable parties in a situation like this civil suit. Itās an uphill climb already, but being this level of unlikeable makes it closer to a vertical ascent.
Yes, and as I said earlier, there were witnesses who refuted what she understood to be the situation. Believe whomever you (g) want. It makes no difference in the civil trial if she refuses to testify and Iām not sure how her recollection applies to the civil suit.
Im personally very much looking forward to hearing all the details which havenāt been told yet. Sounds like there is a lot more that hasnāt come out
From the GFM update:
48 Hours showed you what the Kanareks are, but you have only seen the tip of the iceberg. There is so much more that you donāt know, because the judge blocked it from the criminal trial, and 48 Hours couldnāt tell the whole story. It will only be through the civil trial where Michael is counter suing that you will finally hear the whole truth
What are you talking about? Other than trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. It seems the original topic went over your head. The subject matter was specifically LK accusing MB and MHG of doing outrageous things to get her horses. LKās horses are not international quality dressage prospects suitable for competitive GP riders., IE. MB and MHG. Itās delusional to believe MB or MHG wanted her horses. Hence, the clear difference in examples of what a nice ammy prospect is versus an international quality dressage horse.
Meh. I do not think I will be shocked at all. Nothing LK (or her parents) can say or do - or has said or done - can possibly shock me anymore.
Mind you, I had training in these matters from someone close to LKās level who thought she was also playing 5D chess with usā¦ and ended up hoist fiercely by her own petard. Our TBFH (Trainer Bitch From Hell) and LK should have a chance to get together at some pointā¦
You are very anti Barisone, and I get that, but itās still fascinating to me who and what you choose to believe. I donāt know whether or not to believe that person, because itās one person, and Iād have to hear/know/see more. I bet if I told you that MB once yelled at me for tying my shoe youād believe me, eh?
Maybe we could all send an email to Law and Crime requesting coverage. Based on even non-equestrian interest/participation during the criminal trial, I would think there would be continuing interest for the civil trial to make it worth their while. (Of course, assuming that the judge would approve it).
But then the last paragraph with backhanded insults really nailed it
There is a difference, generally, between Olympic or very top level horses, and the amateurs horse. Or some horses simply top out at 3rd level, and thatās fine too. The point was why would MB want one of LKās horses who arenāt or werenāt of his caliber?
No one is disputing that there is a difference. Thatās obvious, and I think Warmblood1 has a clue. Whereas the poster who felt the need to, basically insult her, hasnāt a clue and missed the entire point.
If people want to take LKās word for it re MB wanting one or some of her horses, then ok, but donāt expect anyone else to respect that as the absolute truth. Itās funny how some people who are here for āthe truthā and āthe factsā only consider one side of the story, without proof. I mean, there was that other poster, Seahorse, who had something negative to say about MB, and I suppose to some, one anecdote is proof enough. So I guess that some would believe me when I say that Iām actually the next Queen of England and Charles is only King by mistake. I am the secret Royal. Iām sure I can get someone else to come on here and agree with me.
To go with, and I know it has been said but worth repeating. This in no way is saying that a really nice ammy friendly horse is not a GREAT thing. The world needs far more wonderful ammy friendly mounts than it does Olympic level mounts.
It was simply rebutting Lauren Kanarekās insistence that MHG and Michael wanted her horses for themselves.
Does that mean you get to love on Emma, that adorable pony that the Queen rode? I am jealous.