Barisone Jury Deliberation

LOL. In other threads, I was terrified at the way you came at @Erinmeri, @RND, and later at me.

You’ve been very admirably civil in this thread, but I don’t think it’s because viciousness is just not how you do it “where you’re from”, or because of “how you were raised.”

3 Likes

Maybe because it never happened?
[/quote]
Or he would have to admit to taking the phone?
[/quote]

This is such a silly line of feigned arguing. If Jh had really stolen the phone, that would have only bolstered the state’s case, so it isn’t likely to have been something the prosecution would leave out.

If they didn’t ask, it’s because it was never brought up to them, probably because LK didn’t think to feed that lie to the prosecution at the time, only a month or so before the trial. Unlike the lies she did think to feed, such as insinuating the insurance fraud and the corruption in the USEF.

ETA: I do think LK testified to having approached the insurance adjuster about fraud….and the adjuster testified that he’d never talked to anyone about it other than MB.

12 Likes

The irony here is that the more its posted about LK being a good guy or not lying or being just a perfect little buttercup, those very same posts convince people more and more as to how untenable this situation was to endure for MB and those at Hawthorne Hill and how dislocated from reality that “other side” truly is.

10 Likes

It can also be a matter of circumstance.

The amount of handwashing that might seem reasonable could vary widely based on whether you were in the middle of a global pandemic, for example.

So the amount of handwashing that might have seemed ridiculous in March 2019 could seem completely rational a year later in March 2020 when Covid first hit and nobody knew yet exactly how it was transmitted.

Ditto for being in a different situation that is completely unprecedented in your experience and thus impossible to predict what might happen next.

4 Likes

I think Bilinkas could have brought it up on cross.

1 Like

THIS. A thousand times THIS. It is frustrating to still read - after all these threads - that MB is somebody’s hero or that anyone who is not ga-ga over La-La is an MB fan. Cantering Carrot explained it well - but various posters have explained it throughout these threads to no avail. Apparently if you dare to discuss and puzzle over issues that do not agree with the views of a select few, you must adore MB. Complete BS.

Agreed.

More than odd - it is bizarre and revolting. What complete nonsense. Rowdy, how did you come to that particular insightful observation? Kindly link to the multitude of posts stating that.

Well, I am older now - so I guess that I am past my prime and incompetent. Kindly inform my BO of that - and she can fire me so I do not have this 24/7 job anymore and someone younger with far l ess experience and zero knowledge of these horses can take over. :wink:

Reading this thread this morning has pushed many of my buttons - and after a sleepless night nursing a geriatric mare through a colic, my buttons are touchy.

Every poster’s comments add depth to the conversation - but most of us do not delight in insults, sneers etc. When posters can manage to control their need to do that, their posts are far more interesting and contribute far more. I find it sad that LK-style (milder version without the screaming caps) posting is admired and applauded.

Well, someone lied on the stand. Her and RG’s accounts did not match. She hemmed and hawed her way through questions. Claiming that someone else “stole” her phone to look up things on the internet is the kind of lame lie I would have come up with as a kid when trying to CMA - and it fooled no one.

The poster who has done the the most serious LK bashing here - has been LK herself. She has done herself far more harm with her own posts here… and she delighted in doing so - here, on FB - anywhere she had a stage and a platform. That is not bashing - that is an observation and opinion. As in…

… but we are supposed to ignore things like that, I guess.

20 Likes

Excellent point.

:snowflake::snowflake::snowflake:

6 Likes

Yeah you’re all victimy n stuff

11 Likes

Yep, I bet he’s really nervous about that now. And he should be.

Was there a single honest, upstanding person connected to the LK/RG side of this whole thing? Like, even one?

19 Likes

I’m going to run errands and get some fresh air. I suggest many of you do the same.

Oh, you’re at work? You sure about that?

Not a one.

5 Likes

He was a prosecution witness. JH taking the phone and doing the search, not Bob doing it on their own phone, would have helped the prosecution. So if that actually happened I would think that the prosecutor would have brought it up with JH instead of sweeping the whole thing under the rug and hoping the jury did not notice that fabrication.

9 Likes

Who specifically on this forum has said this about LK?

2 Likes

COMPLETELY agree!

And remember… co-counsel on the defense side is MBs civil attorney. If that civil case goes forward? Oh boy. I think that recording from the day RG sat in on a meeting with JK, LK and ED is going to become a VERY big deal.

Because remember… ED also testified during this trial that RG was NOT his client. It was crystal clear. JK hired ED to represent LK, and ONLY LK.

So guess what? Bye bye privileged conversation.

Not good for ED. Not good at all.

14 Likes

JH testified before LK. So there was no way for Mr. B to question JH about something that LK had not said on the stand yet.

8 Likes

That actually sounds more like a transcription error. Eye/ thigh?

9 Likes

She actually works in family practice.

1 Like

I’m saying that it has not been established that she committed perjury, and it is a very standard CoTH tactic to assert that she has committed perjury without substantiation, or even bothering to identify the specific statement in which she supposedly committed perjury.

Several posters brought up “inconsistencies” and her needing to have her memory refreshed, or lying on SM but none of those things is perjury.

You’re the only one who bothered to even identify a specific false statement under oath. But when I point out that the contradiction - that bugs were found in places other than her locker- is not in evidence, your response seems to be “Oh, come on, everyone knows that!”

Move the discussion forward? When has the discussion ever moved forward?

2 Likes

Tarshus

Clearly you use a different dictionary than I.

13 Likes