Barisone KROL this Friday, 5/26

[eggbutt]

[Knights_Mom]

Or maybe the above Google isn’t really THE Google but rather another source of “information”.

[Maria]

Wink wink nod nod, could be

[SoCoPony]

It’s a pattern that’s for sure and I am not talking about a cloverleaf pattern.

First by a certain set of now “barned” posters and now it seems another set of posters has taken up the torch.

So very strange but I am just a horse of course

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@ekat

I don’t think. “Butthurt” is not a term I use.

It is so weird that @hut-ho78 assigned that term to you of all people.

I think you are one of the least likely posters to use a term like that.

Oh the joys of intentional drama, I guess.

Hut-Ho did not “assign” the term “butthurt” to Ekat specifically.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@KarenK

@CurrentlyHorseless

The judge determined that he was a danger.

And Taylor is butt hurt because he didn’t get a GUILTY verdict! Poor Taylor ::sniffle::

In my opinion, Taylor’s objective was to provide a fair trial according to the law, and did not want a specific verdict.

It is very insulting to the judge to assert that he “wanted” a particular verdict. That questions his ethics and impartiality. Equally, it is insulting to suggest that his supposed preference on the verdict would influence his handling of the Krol hearings.

[SoCoPony]

*sidebar

Well it’s that time of year it seems the flies are out.

Do any humans have any suggestions on a good spray to get rid of them?

[eggbutt]

Someone must have missed the dozens of posts questioning/discussing Taylor’s ethics and bias. Or they have a very short memory.

[KurPlexed]

It’s very insulting of CH to pretend she hasn’t seen them.

[eggbutt]

Eggbuttism for the week:

[eggbutt]

It’s selective reading for sure.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

Someone must have missed the dozens of posts questioning/discussing Taylor’s ethics and bias. Or they have a very short memory.

I have not missed the dozens of posts not merely “questioning/discussing” Taylor’s ethics, but outright accusing him of bias. The formal complaints lodged against him went nowhere, so the supervisory body didn’t think he was biased, either.

I just disagree with the accusations that he was biased or unfair, or “wanted” a guilty verdict.

[eggbutt]

Well, for heaven’s sake stay away from the L&C and 48 Hours YT posts about Taylor or you will be thoroughly disgusted. There are thousands of them!

Don’t you disagree with everything on this forum?

[Sdel]

@eggbutt

It’s selective reading for sure.

It’s bad faith discussion.

[Unfforgettable]

@hut-ho78

Yes, you are wrong. I’ve always held the judge is fair, professional, and unbiased. I can’t wrap my head around comments here that the judge is “butthurt” and “vindictive” and “biased” followed by more comments that seem designed to make him even more so.

You might want to learn more about reading body language, from posture to facial expressions. And maybe a little about tone of voice.

[MHM]

@Maria

You are smarter than this.

I’m not quite sure why people keep saying this to some posters.

[Unfforgettable]

Fly spray? Endure.
Which seems kind of fitting, given what we’re trying to deal with here.

[hut-ho78]

@eggbutt

Well, if Taylor is so concerned about a few people disagreeing with him on this forum, he must have had a fit about the official complaints lodged against him! Obviously those complaints went nowhere because it IS the State of NJ after all.

Exactly [edit]. You call him vindictive and then organize complaints against him. Why would you risk goading him if you want MB out?

[SoCoPony]

I thought the mods frowned upon nicknames.

And the one mentioned above sounds just like something a "barned"posters would use.

Now I can’t be the only one who is seeing this odd mind melt thing going on.

But I am just a horse of course

[hut-ho78]

@trubandloki

nothing we say should matter at all, right?

Well there is the quote of the day right there.