Iâve looked at some of the YT comments. The vast majority are superficial value statements based on the 48 hours segment. I have not seen any trying to question the fact that MB shot her, as conveyed by the episode.
Please read more carefully the full sentence that was checked as âyesâ. It was very broad and would have covered a wide range of âconcerns or allegationsâ. On the stand, the CPS worker narrowed it down to investigating MHG for neglect.
Sorry (not sorry), wrong again. Just because you havenât seen any, doesnât mean they arenât there. You said you âlooked at some,â there are over 3500 comments. How can you possibly state ââŠthe vast majorityâŠ?â So, once again CH, youâre wrong.
Being worried and considering it an emergency worthy of a 911 call are two different things.
MB called 911 the next day after reading her FB posts. He was right to be worried, but itâs not an emergency worthy of a 911 call. Likewise, a boarder in the barn after 9;00 and a boarder declining to sign a document are not 911 emergencies.
Well, to a delusional person, perhaps those things require a 911 call.
More evidence of bad faith discussion. Of course the YT comments are about the episode. What else would they be about?
And we all know the episode didnât go deep into evidence. It is one of our criticisms that there was so much more that they didnât even touch. How on earth would their viewers and commentators know things like Lauren had access to the safe upon which to comment?
Really, this is just sour grapes that you couldnât find any receipts to post.
But it canât be. Because that is not what Lauren Kanarek said in her post here on this forum when she was telling us all what really happened.
Here, let me paste it again because I feel like some people must have missed it when I shared it earlier today.
(Not you @SoCoPony, not implying you missed it at all.)
To clarify, my question about whether Schellhorn had a copy of the full report/transcript was in regards to the comments earlier about him saying to Baptiste âI donât think thereâs any direct evidence brought out of that.â It was in response to her question: âHave you ever seen any evidence that Michael Barrisone abused or neglected Maryâs children or any children?â
And I commented that I donât think he would respond that way if he didnât have some knowledge to base his comment on. I think he HAD seen the transcript and KNEW there wasnât anything in there to indicate abuse to minors, and I also believe that he recognized that it was LKâs blathering that caused the SS investigator to select that check box. But of course, Schellhorn didnât care about the fact that she had targeted MB for defamation/ruination. He only cared about getting a conviction for an âattempted murderâ because it would grease the skids for his next promotion to Chief Assistant Prosecutor and help lay the groundwork for future career moves.
No. Iâm saying that based on the testimony of the CPS worker, LK did not accuse MB of sexual abuse of the children.
He incorrectly and tragically may have inferred that she had accused him of sexual abuse when he saw the CPS woman arrive, and reacted by getting the gun out of the safe.