Barisone KROL this Friday, 5/26

[Warmblood1]

Please cite proof of that.

[MHM]

@Warmblood1

Please cite proof of that.

I would suggest not holding your breath on that one.

[MHM]

Yes, I left the /s off my previous post.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The criterion for release of a NGRI committee is not “not dangerous”. It’s that the mental defect is cured.

Cite your sources, please!

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The criterion for release of a NGRI committee is not “not dangerous”. It’s that the mental defect is cured.

Prime example of someone just wanting to pick a fight.

Please ignore.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The criterion for release of a NGRI committee is not “not dangerous”. It’s that the mental defect is cured.

How bizarre that the state’s own criteria say otherwise!

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The criterion for release of a NGRI committee is not “not dangerous”. It’s that the mental defect is cured.

Also strange that the statute you yourself cited says otherwise.

[SoCoPony]

If someone is found NGRI and it is found that they are bi-polar, then according to CH that person will never be release.

Why because there is no cure for bipolar disorder.

CH your logic and interpretation is flawed, sorry do not pass go, do not collect two hundred dollars, but you can start going counter clockwise in the round pen.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@erinmeri

@Knights_Mom

I believe that Schellhorn & Co are weaponizing this part of MBs recovering laying a trap by insisting he’s not releasable until he admits it. Then if he admits it, they’ll come up with some other component. It is THEY who are living in the past, not MB. They refuse to acknowledge what is NOW while they weaponize anything MB says or does.

And everyone there saw it.

I suppose my whole point is that they aren’t necessarily correlated. The issue at hand, under the law, should be exclusively whether he represents a danger to society. I am not a mental health professional, but I fail to see how those two things cannot be separated. He can both not accept the state’s version of events and be not dangerous, IMHO.

The criterion for release of a NGRI committee is not “not dangerous”. It’s that the mental defect is cured.

Wrong.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The so called “Barisone supporters” continuing to relitigate the shooting in SM and continuing to say that LK is the perpetrator and Barisone is the victim feeds and supports his delusions.

Do you want to support Barisone or support his delusions?

This is effing rich. The only ones relitigating anything are you and the Kanareks. The rest of us have been discussing why it is unreasonable to demand someone admit to something they do not recollect in order to receive treatment or due process under the law.

You see, this is where several of us got our panties in a huge wad when Barisone gave in to Lauren’s pleas to drop the suit once she learned just how deeply the civil trial would delve into her past AND would require her to prove her allegations that Barisone shot her. She and her parents should be kissing the ground he walks on for letting her get off that easily. I would have spent my last dime exposing them, but hey, it wasn’t my decision. We assume Silver, Deininger, and Bilinkas were well prepared to out ALL of the Kanarek’s dirty little secrets. But alas, it was Barisone’s kind heart and decision to stop bleeding money with the Kanarek intentional delays. And yet, the Kanareks and you continue your ridiculous loop of BS posts and unproven allegations.

But alas, the truth will still come out, every little morsel, in the fairly near future. I can wait for that to happen for sure.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Are his lawyers (and LO) being honest with him and telling him the hard truth that he shot LK?

OMG? What effing hard truth?

I’m sorry, I just can’t deal with this deliberate ignorance and malarkey anymore. There are many words I would love to post but won’t provide the satisfaction of flagging the post.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The criterion for release of a NGRI committee is not “not dangerous”. It’s that the mental defect is cured.

Now that you’ve been disproven… are you going to admit it? Offer an apology? What’s next?

[Sdel]

@erinmeri

What’s next?

Do you really have to ask? How about we just stick with an apology? Maybe a promise to go run off into the sunset?

[erinmeri]

@Sdel

Do you really have to ask? How about we just stick with an apology?

We both know that is unlikely, so I was just curious about the other courses of action.

[CindyB59]

Those darn pesky facts again

[SoCoPony]

@SoCoPony

Are the K’s and laundry boy being honest about what really happened?

Yeah, I am still waiting on a response from CH about this one, but again when it comes to hard questions CH can’t seem to get there on the first try.

[erinmeri]

This will probably interest nobody, but I find it incredibly fascinating that a select few are so devoted to their narrative as to persistently promote an obviously false narrative. I am curious about the psychology of that, particularly for those who are ostensibly strangers and unrelated to the parties. Why do we see this apparent sealioning, trolling, and adherence to mistruths from people with no apparent skin in the game? It’s really odd… and concerning.

[CindyB59]

Aren’t many mental illnesses never “cured”. Somewhat like addiction? Rather, they are managed by medication, coping strategies and the like. Learning to recognize stressors and healthy ways to cope. Am I wrong?

[erinmeri]

@CindyB59

Aren’t many mental illnesses never “cured”. Somewhat like addiction? Rather, they are managed by medication, coping strategies and the like. Learning to recognize stressors and healthy ways to cope. Am I wrong?

You are not wrong.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

Are you asking me to cite my sources, @erinmeri?

Like this?