Florida requires early morning riding in August. Were one wanting to ride 3 horses before it got hot I could see getting up at 4 am to be ready to ride Horse 1 at 6 am, Horse 2 at 7, Horse 3 at 8.
Secondly, and more importantly - notice how MB was body-shaming LK. âOh wow, you look like a model, all girls should [look] like that.â
Sounds more like a compliment and only someone who is delusional would consider it body-shaming. And despite it being a compliment to LK, she elected to claim to SS that he was body-shaming HER.
Deliberate, cold, calculating, malicious, wicked, malevolent, pernicious, diabolical. I am sure there are more similar adjectives that describe herâŚ
As an aside, a woman who was at the same trainer as me and showed western pleasure used to not wear a bra when showing. I asked her why, and she replied âscar tissueâ - as in, her implants and the built up tissue beneath them kept everything from bobbling around when she rode. YMMVâŚ
Yes, she wanted the vet to state that one of her horses was losing conditioning (JT, maybe) and that shouldnât happen because she was paying for training rides.
Stomp, stomp, stomp âdo they thing Iâm going to ride all my horses all the time?â
Was that she thought she was going to sue MB for? Or was that about the $$$ he allegedly owed RG?
And was that why her claim about having access to the office, contracts, and ability to forge was important, because she was going to forge a contract stipulating the majority of the riding would be done by Barisone Dressage rather than her?
I mean, otherwise, if the bulk of riding isnât the duty of one âŚhow do you prove the lack of fitness is that partyâs fault?
Eta if you prove itâs Barisone Dressage fault, um what are you suing for exactly? 1/4 of $5000 for a few months? Board/training for all these months since she bought the horse (but she didnât have him very long?)?
Itâs very confusing what she thought sheâd gain.
And if it was JT, didnât he have a chronic health issue, that if flaring, might preclude him being ridden enough to be fit?
.
Hey, [CH] The checkbox was on the SS form, and it was checked by the SS staffer who interviewed LK, either due to LKâs direct answer to that question (i.e., she answered âYESâ) OR because LK made other comments that led the SS worker to think minors were possibly at risk.
CPS is an entirely different organization and not affiliated with SS so it (CPS) is free to draw its own conclusions. As I stated earlier, there was not enough direct evidence on the SS report to indicate immediate risk of actual harm to the children, so CPS performed the most basic of investigations - a perfunctory âsocial welfare visitâ to try to determine if further investigation/action is warranted. And Iâm betting that they quite quickly realized the allegations were a bunch of hogwash spouted by someone with an axe to grind.