Barisone KROL this Friday, 5/26

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Djones

@CurrentlyHorseless

I see how Barisone’s suit against the insurance companies has everything to do with LK

Fixed it for ya

Why don’t you explain how Barisone’s suit has anything to with LK if that’s what you believe?

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Why don’t you explain how Barisone’s suit has anything to with LK if that’s what you believe?

What?
You are asking for someone to do something?
Something that has already been done several times already?
I thought you prided yourself in not doing that stuff.

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

You are asking for someone to do something?
Something that has already been done several times already?
I thought you prided yourself in not doing that stuff.

I was just going to say:

Objection, asked and answered.

[Davignport]

You really can’t be serious!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

MB can’t request a hearing until SS issues a sanction, which they haven’t done yet.

First a ban pre trial, and now a temporary one is not a sanction?

@CurrentlyHorseless

My understanding of SS policy is that if you’ve been charged with a crime, you need a straight NG in order to avoid a permanent suspension via judicial disposition.

He did not get a straight NG.

So, what exactly is SS’s hold up to banning him? Why did they change that ban to a temporary suspension after the trial? Seems the ban prior to the trial still covered the NGRI according to you.

If someone is charged with a crime, SS issues a ban or permanent suspension automatically without conducting its own investigation. So immediately after the shooting, Barisone was automatically made ineligible via judicial disposition with no SS investigation.

When the trial ended with a NGRI verdict, at that point SS needed to investigate, and issued an interim suspension while the investigation is pending.

The policy is that once a person is ineligible via judicial disposition, they remain ineligible unless the court case resulted in a not guilty verdict.

Barisone is not out of the woods with SS because 1) NGRI is not the same as not guilty, and 2) even if he had been found not guilty, SS through their own investigation can ban him for non criminal acts.

[SoCoPony]

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

If someone is charged with a crime, SS issues a ban or permanent suspension automatically without conducting its own investigation. So immediately after the shooting, Barisone was automatically made ineligible via judicial disposition with no SS investigation.

When the trial ended with a NGRI verdict, at that point SS needed to investigate, and issued an interim suspension while the investigation is pending.

The policy is that once a person is ineligible via judicial disposition, they remain ineligible unless the court case resulted in a not guilty verdict.

Barisone is not out of the woods with SS because 1) NGRI is not the same as not guilty, and 2) even if he had been found not guilty, SS through their own investigation can ban him for non criminal acts.

Oh look, more things CH is saying as fact.

They could be true (certainly not saying they are) but since CH has a long history of stating things as fact that are not even close to true, no one will never believe them.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

Why don’t you explain how Barisone’s suit has anything to with LK if that’s what you believe?

What?
You are asking for someone to do something?
Something that has already been done several times already?
I thought you prided yourself in not doing that stuff.

Only because she quoted me and edited the quote to make it look like I was endorsing her position, instead of the opposite.

Yes, she did note “Fixed that for ya” to indicate she had messed with my quote.

If she wants to take a position diametrically opposed to mine, she can make the case herself, rather than pretend I’ve said it. But it’s probably a hard case to make, hence the reliance on the cutsy “fixed that for ya.” It’s not that cute.

Altering someone’s words then adding “fixed that for ya” is what I pride myself in not doing. It’s lazy and trite.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

If someone is charged with a crime, SS issues a ban or permanent suspension automatically without conducting its own investigation. So immediately after the shooting, Barisone was automatically made ineligible via judicial disposition with no SS investigation.

When the trial ended with a NGRI verdict, at that point SS needed to investigate, and issued an interim suspension while the investigation is pending.

The policy is that once a person is ineligible via judicial disposition, they remain ineligible unless the court case resulted in a not guilty verdict.

Barisone is not out of the woods with SS because 1) NGRI is not the same as not guilty, and 2) even if he had been found not guilty, SS through their own investigation can ban him for non criminal acts.

Oh look, more things CH is saying as fact.

They could be true (certainly not saying they are) but since CH has a long history of stating things as fact that are not even close to true, no one will never believe them.

I have stated what I believe to be the facts about the way SS works.

If you disagree, feel free to respond with your position. It’s a discussion board.

Of course each reader can choose to believe what I’ve written, or not. It’s a discussion board.

[SoCoPony]

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Davignport

You really can’t be serious!

Serious that @Djones should state her own position instead of altering my post to make it look like I’m stating it for her?

I guess that is a lot to ask.

[SoCoPony]

[KarenK]

@eggbutt

one could wonder if that little gang of “police officers” got together and discussed what to put in their reports.

100% without a doubt!!!
I have a good friend who is a recently retired chief of police in a NJ town…I messaged him and asked if having a report approved and not being approved for 2 months is a common practice…I’m curious to see what he says!!

[KarenK]

@CurrentlyHorseless

each reader can choose to believe what I’ve written, or not

OR…they can read between the…lines!!!

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Barisone is probably a lifetime member of USEF. Is he current on his SS training?

How utterly cute. Tell us how Barisone could possibly be current on his SS training since he has been incarcerated for 3 1/2 years. Oh, and how would he have been able to ride? I think you are seriously pushing a boundary here.

[LiberalSnowflake]

Surely it’s time for a recipe …

[Mondo]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Barisone is probably a lifetime member of USEF. Is he current on his SS training?

Seriously? What a silly question. He’s been incarcerated as you well know. Obviously then he’s not competing. So why would he care? More whataboutism baloney to get the focus off of your evil mistress.

[CanteringCarrot]

Yes! You to tell those Plebs!

Lazy and trite!

scoffs from an ivory tower

[Mondo]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Barisone is not out of the woods with SS because 1) NGRI is not the same as not guilty, and 2) even if he had been found not guilty, SS through their own investigation can ban him for non criminal acts.

No. Once again, incorrect.

[CanteringCarrot]

I am not arrogant enough to pretend to know what SS will do regarding MB, or what they’re considering at the moment.

Am I curious? Yeah, sure.

I don’t think any movement will be made until MB is released and expresses interest in getting back into horsey stuff.