This is a perfect example of why you are all spitting in the wind by arguing with CH. On no planet are these two things the same. It’s very clear to me that she is, for lack of a better term, jerking you all around.
Serious that you don’t/can’t/won’t understand why the insurance suit has anything to do with LK. Things will be brought out that she thought would stay hidden when she refused to sit for a deposition. Nobody is going to request this suit is dropped.
Here is another ex. of you not going further into detail and explaining to the class what the actions by LK, JK and RG did that ended up with LK getting shot, by someone because of the lack of forensics.
Oh wow!!! Is this who gave LK that “superior” financial advice regarding money making benefits of having a mortgage (that she denied having) that she posted on YT?
Once the insurance companies see the documents/data/information/call-it-what-you-will, they will probably approach with a very hefty settlement, including Barisone’s legal fees. Hmmmm, I wonder if all those attorneys are aware of LK, 48 Hours, JK and YouTube?
Now go further and with “She requested the civil suit to be dropped that is why she didn’t sit for a deposition in the civil case”.
Horse of course is thinking she was/is pony pooting in her panties over sitting for a deposition and even more so because if called on in the insurance suit, she won’t have a choice, but to do so or face the legal consequences.
I am not going to explain how you are wrong with your first point. I realize it is not a question, but it is something stated as fact that is not wholly correct and it is getting old correcting your fantasies.
I am playing this card for that statement.
The second item is just plain wrong.
Which I have no doubt you know.
But for those who do not realize that CH is making stuff up again.
Summary judgement and dismissal aren’t the same things. And typically, a motion for summary judgment comes after discovery.
On your third point, clearly we have to wait and see.
I look forward to laughing at the Kanarek family as they ignore subpoenas once again.
You can make up incorrect titles for the actions for my reactions to the things someone who thinks it will be funny to make someone homeless are… (do you want me to post that text again?)
I mean, how does it makes sense for a lawyer to think it is OK to ignore a subpoena and Jonathan Kanarek is a lawyer and his lovely wife Kirby Kanarek is clearly married to a lawyer, but both just ignored subpoenas.
I am just theorizing that the tigers will not change their stripes.
It would be foolish of me to think that Jonathan Kanarek and Kirby Kanarek will suddenly become the type of person who actually respects the courts and answers a basic subpoena, don’t you think?