And fabulous horses, which only improve with her riding them, not just normal horses, which digress when Lauren rides them. At least, according to her videos spaced months apart, they seem more strung out at the passage she likes to film herself doing. Very wierd and not collected and balanced. Anyway. MHG is a fabulous rider.
18 Likes
Besides LKās impeached testimony, please LIST the other evidence youāre talking about here.
P.S. Not holding my breath, since I watched the trial.
Edit to change trail to trial.
15 Likes
There was a sad and disappointing update on the GoFundMe page on 7/2. Other than that, no.
5 Likes
Strange? Bizarre? Peculiar? Pathological? Are those the words you are searching for? 
18 Likes
The jurors watched the trial and apparently there was sufficient evidence for them to conclude he committed actus reus.
Your repeatedly asking me this is sealioning.
1 Like
What a disgusting post. It got 30 likes.
2 Likes
You sound jealous!
29 Likes
Which is frankly more sad if she doesnāt actually know her, imo
23 Likes
Well, that should tell you something.
31 Likes
Or crying for attention.
9 Likes
15 Likes
Different than you asking me how many times (more than you were asked here) about Jonathan Kanarek and his text about it being funny to make someone homeless?
18 Likes
Liking Vera is now considered disgusting. Got it.
What a strange thing for you to say.
26 Likes
Not quite sealioning, but to each their own.
The jury did in fact find MB NGRI. So that is your ultimate proof that MB shot LK, correct?
Given the evidence presented at the trial (put the jury aside for a moment, or pretend that this was prior to the verdict being released) what conclusion would you have come to? The evidence, specifically forensics, was convincing enough for you?
18 Likes
No, itās not āultimate proofā because absolute uncertainty is very, very, rare.
The fact that the jury determined to the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt that MB committed the guilty act means that I can treat the statement āMB shot LKā as a fact.
I would have come to the same conclusion as the jury, based on LKs injuries, her 911 call saying āMichael Barisone shot me in the heartā (even though her shot her in the lungs), the ear witness testimony, the testimony on the chain of custody of the gun, and the fact that the police found MB lying on the gun.
1 Like
No, @trubandloki. Asking whether I was āintimately involved with either MB or Vera, or wanted to beā is disgusting. Duh.
1 Like
That is not how I read your post, but good try.
Thanks for letting me know your wrong thoughts on it though.
7 Likes
Depends on how you read it, or how you read in between the lines, I suppose.
But you do you once again.
Youāre just too entertaining today.
11 Likes
I said the post by @Djones asking if I was āintimately involvedā with either MB or Vera was ādisgustingā. Itās not a complicated concept.
1 Like
But the legal reality is the jury found he committed the act, and that he was not responsible because he was insane. That is the underlying finding in the NGRI. How does raising this point of the jury finding justify suggesting someone is biased, pro-LK, blind, stupid or not tied to reality? The point of the NGRI, is that he is not criminally responsible but it does not negate the act itself. This is a legal ruling with obvious serious consequences. Who is the denier here?
It seems some individualās support for him relies on him not having committed the act with various alternative scenerios given. Can you accept him if (by some remote possiblity per the various scenerios) he did the act, as the jury found?
Yes juryās can get it wrong-but since you cannot appeal NGRI findings, he cannot relitigate this now and be found formally and legally innocent of having committed the act. That is the reality.
1 Like
