She was sooooo brilliant she didn’t even need to show up! Duh!!!
cutter99:How dare they not realize her perfect brilliance in the saddle and see the talent just oozing from her?
That’s not talent oozing.
For clarity, here is the rest of that section. Mr Deininger is specifically stating he doesn’t know how much is in dispute, therefore, it’s premature to move to US District Court.
In order to present a clear picture, this is from the doc titled Removal to US District Court. Notice the language “On information and belief”, which seems to cause angst when Mr Deininger uses it, but here it is in Great American’s pleading. Also, this is Great American’s attorney advising the court as to what American National represented that Mr Deininger told them.
Email Exhibit D
Or independent living, which is how most 42 year old people live.
Or independent living, which is how most 42 year old people live.
Good point!
Knights_Mom: cutter99:How dare they not realize her perfect brilliance in the saddle and see the talent just oozing from her?
That’s not talent oozing.
Sssshhhh it’s bubbling personality!
cutter99: Knights_Mom: cutter99:How dare they not realize her perfect brilliance in the saddle and see the talent just oozing from her?
That’s not talent oozing.
Sssshhhh it’s bubbling personality!
That make prescription drugs for things like that!
That wasn’t the only reason it went to the feds. There was that multi state location issue.
That wasn’t the only reason it went to the feds. There was that multi state location issue.
Long-arm rules allow for suits against corporations in local courts if they have contacts with that jurisdiction.
hut-ho78:That wasn’t the only reason it went to the feds. There was that multi state location issue.
Long-arm rules allow for suits against corporations in local courts if they have contacts with that jurisdiction.
Correct! I agree!
LK overplayed her hand and gave no thoughts to the repercussions of her actions.
That’s what narcissists do—ask me how I know!
And just to be clear… nobody permitted you to clarify, as you’re free to post whatever you please*. There are no gatekeepers here.
Just to be clear, it was LilRanger who alerted me to my misuse of the word “precedence”. I appreciated her pointing out the confusion that resulted in my use of the word. When I clarified that I did not mean “legal precedence” but rather reputation, she thanked me for the clarification.
For clarity, here is the rest of that section. Mr Deininger is specifically stating he doesn’t know how much is in dispute, therefore, it’s premature to move to US District Court.
In order to present a clear picture, this is from the doc titled Removal to US District Court. Notice the language “On information and belief”, which seems to cause angst when Mr Deininger uses it, but here it is in Great American’s pleading. Also, this is Great American’s attorney advising the court as to what American National represented that Mr Deininger told them.
Email Exhibit D
I like Mr. Deininger’s reference to the “pain-staking” process of figuring out his own billing of the client.
I like Mr. Deininger’s reference to the “pain-staking” process of figuring out his own billing of the client
I highlighted some words it appears you missed.
CurrentlyHorseless:I like Mr. Deininger’s reference to the “pain-staking” process of figuring out his own billing of the client
I highlighted some words it appears you missed.
No, I saw that.
The word is “painstaking” not “pain-staking”. It comes from the taking of pains, not the staking of pain.
No, I saw that.
The word is “painstaking” not “pain-staking”. It comes from the taking of pains, not the staking of pain.
Oh, so you were mocking a spelling error, not belittling him for
figuring out his own billing of the client.
Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
The word is “painstaking” not “pain-staking”. It comes from the taking of pains, not the staking of pain.
you must be a real joy at parties. No wonder all of your friends are dropping one by one.
Maybe she can send a letter to Mr. Deiningers office, with a complaint.
Or hey maybe have JK write it instead.
I am sure that will set everything straight.
As settlements are largely confidential where are the people getting this information from? Is there a posting board for such, divided up by type of claim, jurisdiction and particular specific judges listed?
That posting board is the same place as the police report that a certain someone strongly implied he/she/whatever had seen.
cutter99:How dare they not realize her perfect brilliance in the saddle and see the talent just oozing from her?
That’s not talent oozing.
Thanks, KM. Now you owe me a new keyboard.